19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patient and Provider Dilemmas of Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management: A Qualitative Study in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Communities in Stockholm

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Studies comparing provider and patient views and experiences of self-management within primary healthcare are particularly scarce in disadvantaged settings. In this qualitative study, patient and provider perceptions of self-management were investigated in five socio-economically disadvantaged communities in Stockholm. Twelve individual interviews and four group interviews were conducted. Semi-structured interview guides included questions on perceptions of diabetes diagnosis, diabetes care services available at primary health care centers, patient and provider interactions, and self-management support. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Two overarching themes were identified: adopting and maintaining new routines through practical and appropriate lifestyle choices (patients), and balancing expectations and pre-conceptions of self-management (providers). The themes were characterized by inherent dilemmas representing confusions and conflicts that patients and providers experienced in their daily life or practice. Patients found it difficult to tailor information and lifestyle advice to fit their daily life. Healthcare providers recognized that patients needed support to change behavior, but saw themselves as inadequately equipped to deal with the different cultural and social aspects of self-management. This study highlights patient and provider dilemmas that influence the interaction and collaboration between patients and providers and hinder uptake of self-management advice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effectiveness of Self-Management Training in Type 2 Diabetes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

          To systematically review the effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm.

            Diabetes is a self-managed illness in which the decisions most affecting the health and well being of patients are made by the patients themselves. Many of these decisions involve routine activities of daily living (e.g., nutrition, physical activity). Effective diabetes care requires patients and health care professionals to collaborate in the development of self-management plans that integrate the clinical expertise of health care professionals with the concerns, priorities and resources of the patient. Collaborative diabetes care requires a new "empowerment" paradigm that involves a fundamental redefinition of roles and relationships of health care professionals and patients. The challenges of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm differ substantially from those associated with the introduction of new technology. Those challenges are discussed in this paper.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Perceived barriers and effective strategies to diabetes self-management.

              This paper reports the perceived barriers to and effective strategies for self-management of adults with type 2 diabetes in a rural setting. Worldwide, diabetes is a major public health concern and financial burden. Research shows that, for people with diabetes, adhering to programs of self-care is often problematic. Despite the potential for improved metabolic control and quality of life, little is published on the barriers and effective strategies that people with diabetes successfully use to incorporate plans of care into their lifestyles. Twenty-four adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were recruited from a rural primary care practice to participate in one of three audiotaped focus groups. Content analysis was conducted on the focus group transcripts and validity was strengthened through independent rankings of barriers and strategies by an expert panel and by the nurse researchers. The data were collected 2002. The most frequently reported barriers were lack of knowledge of a specific diet plan, lack of understanding of the plan of care and helplessness and frustration from lack of glycaemic control and continued disease progression despite adherence. Effective strategies identified were developing a collaborative relationship with a provider, maintaining a positive attitude that prompts proactive learning and having a support person who provides encouragement and promotes accountability. These data highlight the importance of barrier and strategy identification in developing and implementing realistic self-management plans and the significance of collaborative alliances between patients and practitioners. Awareness of barriers, identification of strategies to overcome obstacles and the opportunity to problem solve with practitioners assists patients in managing a chronic illness that requires numerous daily decisions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                22 August 2018
                September 2018
                : 15
                : 9
                : 1810
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden; helle.molsted-alvesson@ 123456ki.se (H.M.A.); meena.daivadanam@ 123456ikv.uu.se (M.D.)
                [2 ]Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, 43, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium; jdeman@ 123456itg.be
                [3 ]Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland; ccsfinland@ 123456gmail.com
                [4 ]Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; claes-goran.ostenson@ 123456ki.se
                [5 ]Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, International Maternal and Child Health, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden; stefan.peterson@ 123456kbh.uu.se
                [6 ]Department of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 560, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: Juliet.aweko@ 123456ki.se ; Tel.: +46-723-95-0205
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7448-6726
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3196-8757
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7203-3096
                Article
                ijerph-15-01810
                10.3390/ijerph15091810
                6164476
                30135373
                1d5a69bd-6d7e-4bad-9e57-fd13942750b0
                © 2018 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 July 2018
                : 16 August 2018
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                sweden,self-management,type 2 diabetes,immigrants,health systems,chronic diseases,qualitative study,lifestyle change,thematic analysis,socioeconomically disadvantaged

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content166

                Cited by13

                Most referenced authors1,166