4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Statistical design and analysis in trials of proportionate interventions: a systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In proportionate or adaptive interventions, the dose or intensity can be adjusted based on individual need at predefined decision stages during the delivery of the intervention. The development of such interventions may require an evaluation of the effectiveness of the individual stages in addition to the whole intervention. However, evaluating individual stages of an intervention has various challenges, particularly the statistical design and analysis. This review aimed to identify the use of trials of proportionate interventions and how they are being designed and analysed in current practice.

          Methods

          We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science and PsycINFO for articles published between 2010 and 2015 inclusive. We considered trials of proportionate interventions in all fields of research. For each trial, its aims, design and analysis were extracted. The data synthesis was conducted using summary statistics and a narrative format.

          Results

          Our review identified 44 proportionate intervention trials, comprising 28 trial results, 13 protocols and three secondary analyses. These were mostly described as stepped care ( n=37) and mainly focussed on mental health research ( n=30). The other studies were aimed at finding an optimal adaptive treatment strategy ( n=7) in a variety of therapeutic areas. Further terminology used included adaptive intervention, staged intervention, sequentially multiple assignment trial or a two-phase design. The median number of decision stages in the interventions was two and only one study explicitly evaluated the effect of the individual stages.

          Conclusions

          Trials of proportionate staged interventions are being used predominantly within the mental health field. However, few studies consider the different stages of the interventions, either at the design or the analysis phase, and how they may interact with one another. There is a need for further guidance on the design, analyses and reporting across trials of proportionate interventions.

          Trial registration

          Prospero, CRD42016033781. Registered on 2 February 2016.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3206-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

            The CONSORT statement is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials. Kenneth Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version, CONSORT 2010, which updates the reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience. To encourage dissemination of the CONSORT 2010 Statement, this article is freely accessible on bmj.com and will also be published in the Lancet, Obstetrics and Gynecology, PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, Open Medicine, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, BMC Medicine, and Trials.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Microrandomized trials: An experimental design for developing just-in-time adaptive interventions.

              This article presents an experimental design, the microrandomized trial, developed to support optimization of just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs). JITAIs are mHealth technologies that aim to deliver the right intervention components at the right times and locations to optimally support individuals' health behaviors. Microrandomized trials offer a way to optimize such interventions by enabling modeling of causal effects and time-varying effect moderation for individual intervention components within a JITAI.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jane.candlish@sheffield.ac.uk
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                28 February 2019
                28 February 2019
                2019
                : 20
                : 151
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9262, GRID grid.11835.3e, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, ; 30 Regent Court, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9668, GRID grid.5685.e, Department of Health Sciences, , University of York, ; Area 2, Seebohm, Rowntree Building, York, Y010 5DD UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0412 8669, GRID grid.9481.4, Hull Health Trials Unit, , University of Hull/Hull York Medical School, ; York, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5280-7891
                Article
                3206
                10.1186/s13063-019-3206-x
                6396459
                30819224
                1d6e0336-e67a-46ca-a1f4-01482143eec3
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 14 June 2017
                : 17 January 2019
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Medicine
                systematic review,complex intervention,trial,proportionate intervention,stepped care,adaptive treatment strategy,adaptive intervention,sequential multiple assignment randomised trial,proportionate universalism

                Comments

                Comment on this article