28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is a set of technologies that are of increasing interest to researchers. BCI has been proposed as assistive technology for individuals who are non-communicative or paralyzed, such as those with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or spinal cord injury. The technology has also been suggested for enhancement and entertainment uses, and there are companies currently marketing BCI devices for those purposes (e.g., gaming) as well as health-related purposes (e.g., communication). The unprecedented direct connection created by BCI between human brains and computer hardware raises various ethical, social, and legal challenges that merit further examination and discussion.

          Methods

          To identify and characterize the key issues associated with BCI use, we performed a scoping review of biomedical ethics literature, analyzing the ethics concerns cited across multiple disciplines, including philosophy and medicine.

          Results

          Based on this investigation, we report that BCI research and its potential translation to therapeutic intervention generate significant ethical, legal, and social concerns, notably with regards to personhood, stigma, autonomy, privacy, research ethics, safety, responsibility, and justice. Our review of the literature determined, furthermore, that while these issues have been enumerated extensively, few concrete recommendations have been expressed.

          Conclusions

          We conclude that future research should focus on remedying a lack of practical solutions to the ethical challenges of BCI, alongside the collection of empirical data on the perspectives of the public, BCI users, and BCI researchers.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-017-0220-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Scoping studies: advancing the methodology

            Background Scoping studies are an increasingly popular approach to reviewing health research evidence. In 2005, Arksey and O'Malley published the first methodological framework for conducting scoping studies. While this framework provides an excellent foundation for scoping study methodology, further clarifying and enhancing this framework will help support the consistency with which authors undertake and report scoping studies and may encourage researchers and clinicians to engage in this process. Discussion We build upon our experiences conducting three scoping studies using the Arksey and O'Malley methodology to propose recommendations that clarify and enhance each stage of the framework. Recommendations include: clarifying and linking the purpose and research question (stage one); balancing feasibility with breadth and comprehensiveness of the scoping process (stage two); using an iterative team approach to selecting studies (stage three) and extracting data (stage four); incorporating a numerical summary and qualitative thematic analysis, reporting results, and considering the implications of study findings to policy, practice, or research (stage five); and incorporating consultation with stakeholders as a required knowledge translation component of scoping study methodology (stage six). Lastly, we propose additional considerations for scoping study methodology in order to support the advancement, application and relevance of scoping studies in health research. Summary Specific recommendations to clarify and enhance this methodology are outlined for each stage of the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Continued debate and development about scoping study methodology will help to maximize the usefulness and rigor of scoping study findings within healthcare research and practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (514) 987-5723 , eric.racine@ircm.qc.ca , http://www.ircm.qc.ca/neuroethics/en
                Journal
                BMC Med Ethics
                BMC Med Ethics
                BMC Medical Ethics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6939
                9 November 2017
                9 November 2017
                2017
                : 18
                : 60
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2292 3357, GRID grid.14848.31, Neuroethics Research Unit, , Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, ; 110 avenue des Pins Ouest, H2W lR7, Montréal, QC Canada
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8649, GRID grid.14709.3b, Department of Experimental Medicine, , McGill University, ; Montréal, Canada
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2292 3357, GRID grid.14848.31, Department of Medicine and Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, , Université de Montréal, ; 110 avenue des Pins Ouest, H2W lR7, Montréal, QC Canada
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8649, GRID grid.14709.3b, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Experimental Medicine and Biomedical Ethics Unit, , McGill University, ; 110 avenue des Pins Ouest, H2W lR7, Montréal, QC Canada
                Article
                220
                10.1186/s12910-017-0220-y
                5680604
                29121942
                1d847baa-66ea-4430-95af-97289218e0d9
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 31 July 2017
                : 31 October 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000024, Canadian Institutes of Health Research;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000156, Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé;
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Medicine
                brain-computer interface,brain-machine interface,scoping review,ethics of technology
                Medicine
                brain-computer interface, brain-machine interface, scoping review, ethics of technology

                Comments

                Comment on this article