17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The state project of crisis management: China’s Shantytown Redevelopment Schemes under state-led financialization

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Since 2008, China has introduced state-led financialization to inject low-interest, stable and long-term loans to facilitate urban redevelopment through national shantytown redevelopment schemes (SRSs). Extending critical state theories to China’s transitional economy, we consider SRSs to be a policy model of the state project (mode of policy-making) of crisis management that aims to revitalize the national economy in the wake of the global financial crisis. Essentially, this state project serves to tackle the legitimation crisis threatened by both the economic crisis and the escalating social discontent. Drawing on an empirical study of Chengdu, a regional hub in western China spearheading SRSs, this paper examines how the Chinese state at different levels interacts with the nascent financial market in the creation of a new “model” of urban redevelopment under state-led financialization. Having been exploited to manage economic and legitimation crises, this model has simultaneously become a source of “crisis of crisis-management” owing to the state’s “over-intervention”. This research contributes to a fresh understanding of the multiplicity of financialization by linking the financialization of urban built environment with the financialization of the state project, in which financial motives and practices shape the mode of policy making. The Chinese experience also presents a decentered interpretation of state-led financialization that renews our understanding of the multifaceted state and state projects, particularly the hybridized, often contradictory motivations and socio-economic outcomes of state interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Law, finance, and economic growth in China

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The financialization of the American economy

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Privatised Keynesianism: An Unacknowledged Policy Regime

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
                Environ Plan A
                SAGE Publications
                0308-518X
                1472-3409
                May 2020
                October 17 2019
                May 2020
                : 52
                : 3
                : 632-653
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Urban Planning and Design, The University of Hong Kong, China; The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Institute of Research and Innovation, China
                [2 ]Department of Urban Planning, School of Architecture, State key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, China
                Article
                10.1177/0308518X19882427
                1d962171-d19b-4245-afb2-a307811b1ea5
                © 2020

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article