21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Self-care and manual ability in preschool children with cerebral palsy: a longitudinal study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development of the Gross Motor Function Classification System for cerebral palsy.

          The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) for cerebral palsy has been widely used internationally for clinical, research, and administrative purposes. This paper recounts the ideas and work behind the creation of the GMFCS, reports on the lessons learned, and identifies some philosophical challenges inherent in trying to develop an ordered, valid, and consistent system to describe function in children and adolescents with developmental differences. It is hoped that these ideas will be useful to others who choose to expand the field with additional systems in other areas of childhood neurodisability.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Relationship among the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and the functional status (WeeFIM) in children with spastic cerebral palsy.

            The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship among functional classification systems, the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and the functional status (WeeFIM) in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP). One hundred and eighty-five children with spastic CP (101 males, 84 females), 65 (35.1%) diparetic, 60 (32.4%) quadriparetic, and 60 (32.4%) hemiparetic children, ranging from 4 to 15 years of age with a median age of 7 years, were included in the study. The children were classified according to the GMFCS for their motor function and according to the MACS for the functioning of their hands when handling objects in daily activities. The functional status and performance were assessed by using the Functional Independence Measure of Children (WeeFIM). A good correlation between the GMFCS and MACS was found in all children (r = 0.735, p 0.05). The use of both the GMFCS and MACS in practice and in research areas will provide an easy, practical, and simple classification of the functional status of children with CP. The adaptation of both of these scales and WeeFIM and using these scales together give the opportunity for a detailed analysis of the functional level of children with spastic CP and reflect the differences between clinical types of CP.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mini-MACS: development of the Manual Ability Classification System for children younger than 4 years of age with signs of cerebral palsy.

              To develop the Mini-Manual Ability Classification System (Mini-MACS) and to evaluate the extent to which its ratings are valid and reliable when children younger than 4 years are rated by their parents and therapists.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
                Dev Med Child Neurol
                Wiley
                00121622
                October 07 2018
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre; Faculty of Medicine; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Queensland Australia
                [2 ]School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Queensland Australia
                [3 ]Menzies Health Institute Queensland; Griffith University; Brisbane Queensland Australia
                [4 ]Queensland Centre for Intellectual and Developmental Disability; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Queensland Australia
                Article
                10.1111/dmcn.14049
                1da88e4f-592c-4136-84d1-5651239fb999
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article