19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      ‘People are fed up; don’t mess with them.’ Non-quantificational Arguments and Polarity Reversals

      Journal of Semantics
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The first sentence in the title means roughly: All the people around are tired. The second means: Do not mess with any of them. Even though the second sentence looks just like a negative counterpart of the first, it doesn’t have the expected compositional meaning: it doesn’t mean “do not mess with all the people”. This phenomenon is extremely general. It takes place with Bare Plurals, as in the title. It figures prominently in the behavior of Plural Definites (I spoke to the students in trouble ≅ ∀/I didn’t speak to the students in trouble ≅ ¬∃). It also takes place with Donkey pronouns (Every farmer who had a donkey sold it ≅ ∀/No man who had a donkey sold it ≅ ¬∃). These switches of quantificational force under polarity reversals call to mind Free Choice phenomena. In particular, a determiner like any is interpreted as a narrow scope existential in a sentence like I didn’t talk to any student in trouble ≅ ¬ ∃; however, in positive environments, the existential meaning of any emerges as strengthened to universal I spoke to any student in trouble ≅ ∀. It is tempting to conjecture that the source of this uniform behavior is a uniform mechanism. While these constructions (Free Choice any, Bare Plurals, Plural Definites, and Donkey pronouns) have been studied extensively, and insightful approaches to Plural Definites in terms of Free Choice mechanisms have also been proposed (Bar Lev 2018, 2021), a unitary analysis has not been attempted to the best of my knowledge. In spite of the many challenges that a unified analysis faces, it is worth a try, for, if successful, it would considerably push forward our understanding of a wide range of very diverse constructions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Word Meaning and Montague Grammar

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A theory of focus interpretation

            Mats Rooth (1992)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Reference to kinds across languages

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Semantics
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0167-5133
                1477-4593
                August 2022
                August 16 2022
                June 03 2022
                August 2022
                August 16 2022
                June 03 2022
                : 39
                : 3
                : 475-521
                Article
                10.1093/jos/ffac006
                1ddfc8db-2429-493f-a18f-0533663724e7
                © 2022

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article