2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Visual Reliance During Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users and Candidates

      1 , 1 , 1
      Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
      American Academy of Audiology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adults with cochlear implants (CIs) are believed to rely more heavily on visual cues during speech recognition tasks than their normal-hearing peers. However, the relationship between auditory and visual reliance during audiovisual (AV) speech recognition is unclear and may depend on an individual’s auditory proficiency, duration of hearing loss (HL), age, and other factors.

          The primary purpose of this study was to examine whether visual reliance during AV speech recognition depends on auditory function for adult CI candidates (CICs) and adult experienced CI users (ECIs).

          Participants included 44 ECIs and 23 CICs. All participants were postlingually deafened and had met clinical candidacy requirements for cochlear implantation.

          Participants completed City University of New York sentence recognition testing. Three separate lists of twelve sentences each were presented: the first in the auditory-only (A-only) condition, the second in the visual-only (V-only) condition, and the third in combined AV fashion. Each participant’s amount of “visual enhancement” (VE) and “auditory enhancement” (AE) were computed (i.e., the benefit to AV speech recognition of adding visual or auditory information, respectively, relative to what could potentially be gained). The relative reliance of VE versus AE was also computed as a VE/AE ratio.

          VE/AE ratio was predicted inversely by A-only performance. Visual reliance was not significantly different between ECIs and CICs. Duration of HL and age did not account for additional variance in the VE/AE ratio.

          A shift toward visual reliance may be driven by poor auditory performance in ECIs and CICs. The restoration of auditory input through a CI does not necessarily facilitate a shift back toward auditory reliance. Findings suggest that individual listeners with HL may rely on both auditory and visual information during AV speech recognition, to varying degrees based on their own performance and experience, to optimize communication performance in real-world listening situations.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
          J Am Acad Audiol
          American Academy of Audiology
          1050-0545
          2157-3107
          May 25 2020
          January 2020
          May 25 2020
          January 2020
          : 31
          : 01
          : 030-039
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
          Article
          10.3766/jaaa.18049
          6911035
          31210633
          1e09fd24-674d-49d2-9420-9936a0a0551f
          © 2020
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article