1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Die Dialectical Behavior Therapy Ways of Coping Checklist (DBT-WCCL) : Deutsche Übersetzung und Erstvalidierung

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Zusammenfassung. Ziel dieser Arbeit war die Erprobung und Validierung einer deutschen Version der Dialectical Behavior Therapy Ways of Coping Checklist (DBT-WCCL, Neacsiu, Rizui, Vitaliano, Lynch & Linehan, 2010), einem Fragebogen zur Erhebung der Häufigkeit der Nutzung von Skills, wie sie im Rahmen der Dialektisch-Behavioralen Therapie (DBT) vermittelt werden. Hierzu bearbeiteten 150 Patientinnen mit Borderline Persönlichkeitsstörung eine deutschsprachige Übersetzung, sowie Fragebögen zur Symptomschwere. Weitere 40 Patientinnen füllten die DBT-WCCL im Rahmen einer stationären DBT zu 5 Messzeitpunkten aus. Die drei Faktoren der Originalversion ließen sich replizieren. Weiterführende Analysen zeigten gute interne Konsistenzen und Retest-Reliabilitäten. Erwartungsgemäße Zunahmen auf der Subskala zur Erfassung von Skillsanwendung während der stationären DBT sowie erwartungsgemäße Zusammenhänge der DBT-WCCL mit der Skills- und DBT-Erfahrung geben erste Hinweise auf die Validität des Verfahrens.

          The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Ways of Coping Checklist (DBT-WCCL): German Translation and First Validation

          Abstract. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a German adaptation of the Dialectical Behavior Therapy Ways of Coping Checklist (DBT-WCCL), a self-report questionnaire that measures the frequency of adaptive and maladaptive skills used to manage difficult situations over the past month. The adaptive skills are derived from dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) but do not include DBT-specific language and can be assessed independent of this treatment. In all, 150 patients with borderline personality disorder completed the German DBT-WCCL adaptation and questionnaires assessing symptom severity. A different sample of 40 patients completed the questionnaire at five different time points while undergoing inpatient DBT. The three-factor structure of the English version was replicated and confirmed. Psychometric analyses indicated good internal consistency and test–retest reliability for all three subscales. Supporting the construct validity of the measure, skills use, as measured with the DBT-WCCL, increased significantly during inpatient DBT. In addition, using skills was significantly positively correlated with prior experience with DBT and perceived use of DBT skills. In conclusion, these results offer preliminary support for the validity and reliability of the German adaptation of the DBT-WCCL.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: the experiential avoidance model.

          Despite increasing attention to the phenomenon of deliberate self-harm (DSH), the literature currently lacks a unifying, evidence-based, theoretical framework within which to understand the factors that control this behavior. The purpose of the present paper is to outline such a framework-the Experiential Avoidance Model (EAM) of DSH. The EAM poses that DSH is primarily maintained by negative reinforcement in the form of escape from, or avoidance of, unwanted emotional experiences. Literature on factors that may lead to experiential avoidance is reviewed, along with the mounting empirical evidence that DSH functions to help the individual escape from unwanted emotional experiences. The EAM integrates a variety of research on emotions, experiential avoidance, and DSH within a clinically useful framework that sparks novel research directions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ten-year course of borderline personality disorder: psychopathology and function from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders study.

            Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is traditionally considered chronic and intractable. To compare the course of BPD's psychopathology and social function with that of other personality disorders and with major depressive disorder (MDD) over 10 years. A collaborative study of treatment-seeking, 18- to 45-year-old patients followed up with standardized, reliable, and repeated measures of diagnostic remission and relapse and of both global social functioning and subtypes of social functioning. Nineteen clinical settings (hospital and outpatient) in 4 northeastern US cities. Three study groups, including 175 patients with BPD, 312 with cluster C personality disorders, and 95 with MDD but no personality disorder. The Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders and its follow-along version (the Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders-Follow-Along Version) were used to diagnose personality disorders and assess changes in them. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders and the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation were used to diagnose MDD and assess changes in MDD and in social function. Eighty-five percent of patients with BPD remitted. Remission of BPD was slower than for MDD (P < .001) and minimally slower than for other personality disorders (P < .03). Twelve percent of patients with BPD relapsed, a rate less frequent and slower than for patients with MDD (P < .001) and other personality disorders (P = .008). All BPD criteria declined at similar rates. Social function scores showed severe impairment with only modest albeit statistically significant improvement; patients with BPD remained persistently more dysfunctional than the other 2 groups (P < .001). Reductions in criteria predicted subsequent improvements in DSM-IV Axis V Global Assessment of Functioning scores (P < .001). The 10-year course of BPD is characterized by high rates of remission, low rates of relapse, and severe and persistent impairment in social functioning. These results inform expectations of patients, families, and clinicians and document the severe public health burden of this disorder.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Ways of Coping Checklist: Revision and Psychometric Properties.

              This study examined the psychometric properties of the "original" seven factored scales derived by Aldwin et al. from Folkman and Lazarus' Ways of Coping Checklist (WCCL) versus a revised set of scales. Four psychometric properties were examined including the reproducibility of the factor structure of the original scales, the internal consistency reliabilities and intercorrelations of the original and the revised scales, the construct and concurrent validity of the scales, and their relationships to demographic factors. These properties were studied on three distressed samples: 83 psychiatric outpatients, 62 spouses of patients with Alzheimer's disease, and 425 medical students. The revised scales were consistently shown to be more reliable and to share substantially less variance than the original scales across all samples. In terms of construct validity, depression was positively related to the revised Wishful Thinking Scale and negatively related to the revised Problem-Focused Scale consistently across samples. Anxiety was also related to these scales, and in addition, it was positively related to the Seeks Social Support Scale across samples. The Mixed Scale was the only original scale that was consistently related to depression and anxiety across the three samples. Evidence for concurrent validity was provided by the fact that medical students in group therapy had significantly higher original and revised scale scores than students not participating in such groups. Both sets of scales were shown to be generally free of demographic biases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                dia
                Diagnostica
                Zeitschrift für Psychologische Diagnostik und Differentielle Psychologie
                Hogrefe Verlag, Göttingen
                0012-1924
                2190-622X
                2017
                : 63
                : 1
                : 29-41
                Affiliations
                [ ]Westfälische Wilhelms-Universiät, Münster Psychotherapie-Ambulanz
                [ ]LWL Klinik Lengerich
                [ ]Duke Universität Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
                [ ]Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Psychologie
                Author notes
                Kerstin Burmeister, Jens Barenbrügge, Prof. Dr. Fred Rist, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universiät Münster, Psychotherapie-Ambulanz, Fliednerstraße 21, 48149 Münster, E-Mail kerstin.burmeister@ 123456gmail.com
                Dr. Klaus Höschel, Dr. Christos Chrysanthou, LWL Klinik Lengerich, Parkallee 10, 49525 Lengerich
                Ph. D. Andrada Delia Neacsiu, Duke Universität Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 2213 Elba St., Durham, NC 27710, North Carolina
                Prof. Dr. Anya Pedersen, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Psychologie, Olshausenstraße 62, 24098 Kiel
                Article
                dia_63_1_29
                10.1026/0012-1924/a000164
                1e3f32f1-364f-4c56-89cb-f0b7f86e7fb1
                Copyright @ 2016
                History
                Categories
                Originalarbeit

                Psychology,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                Borderline Persönlichkeitsstörung,Dialektisch-Behaviorale Therapie,Skillstraining,Reliabilität,Validität,borderline personality disorder,dialectical behavior therapy,skills training,reliability,validity

                Comments

                Comment on this article