Improving COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity by interrupting methotrexate treatment

Objective To determine whether a 2-week methotrexate (MTX) discontinuation after vaccination improves the efficacy of seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods In this prospective randomised parallel-group multicentre study, patients with RA on stable dose of MTX were randomly assigned at a ratio of 1:1 to continue MTX or to hold MTX for 2 weeks after 2016–2017 quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine containing H1N1, H3N2, B-Yamagata and B-Victoria. The primary outcome was frequency of satisfactory vaccine response, defined as greater than or equal to fourfold increase of haemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titre at 4 weeks after vaccination against ≥2 of four vaccine strains. Secondary endpoints included seroprotection (ie, HI titre ≥1:40) rate, fold change in antibody titres. Results The modified intention-to-treat population included 156 patients in the MTX-continue group and 160 patients in the MTX-hold group. More patients in MTX-hold group achieved satisfactory vaccine response than the MTX-continue group (75.5% vs 54.5%, p<0.001). Seroprotection rate was higher in the MTX-hold group than the MTX-continue group for all four antigens (H1N1: difference 10.7%, 95% CI 2.0% to 19.3%; H3N2: difference 15.9%, 95% CI 5.9% to 26.0%; B-Yamagata: difference13.7%, 95% CI 5.2% to 22.4%; B-Victoria: difference 14.7%, 95% CI 4.5% to 25.0%). The MTX-hold group showed higher fold increase in their antibody titres against all four influenza antigens (all p<0.05). Change in disease activity was similar between groups. Conclusions A temporary MTX discontinuation for 2 weeks after vaccination improves the immunogenicity of seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with RA without increasing RA disease activity. Trial registration NCT02897011.

Objective The relative risk of SARS–CoV‐2 infection and COVID‐19 disease severity among people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) compared to those without RMDs is unclear. This study was undertaken to quantify the risk of SARS–CoV‐2 infection in those with RMDs and describe clinical outcomes of COVID‐19 in these patients. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review using 14 databases from January 1, 2019 to February 13, 2021. We included observational studies and experimental trials in RMD patients that described comparative rates of SARS–CoV‐2 infection, hospitalization, oxygen supplementation/intensive care unit (ICU) admission/mechanical ventilation, or death attributed to COVID‐19. Methodologic quality was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools or the Newcastle‐Ottawa scale. Risk ratios (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated, as applicable for each outcome, using the Mantel‐Haenszel formula with random effects models. Results Of the 5,799 abstracts screened, 100 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the systematic review, and 54 of 100 had a low risk of bias. Among the studies included in the meta‐analyses, we identified an increased prevalence of SARS–CoV‐2 infection in patients with an RMD (RR 1.53 [95% CI 1.16–2.01]) compared to the general population. The odds of hospitalization, ICU admission, and mechanical ventilation were similar in patients with and those without an RMD, whereas the mortality rate was increased in patients with RMDs (OR 1.74 [95% CI 1.08–2.80]). In a smaller number of studies, the adjusted risk of outcomes related to COVID‐19 was assessed, and the results varied; some studies demonstrated an increased risk while other studies showed no difference in risk in patients with an RMD compared to those without an RMD. Conclusion Patients with RMDs have higher rates of SARS–CoV‐2 infection and an increased mortality rate.

Low-dose methotrexate (LD-MTX) is the most commonly used drug for systemic rheumatic diseases worldwide and the recommended first-line agent for rheumatoid arthritis. Despite extensive clinical use for over 40 years, few data on adverse event (AE) rates derive from randomized placebo-controlled trials, where both causality and magnitude of risk can be inferred. To investigate AE rates, risk, and risk differences, comparing LD-MTX to placebo. Pre-specified secondary analyses of a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. North America. Adults with known cardiovascular disease and diabetes or metabolic syndrome. Random allocation to LD-MTX (maximum of 20mg/week) or placebo. All subjects received folic acid 1mg per day for six days/week. The risk of specific AEs of interest as well as all AEs were compared across treatment arms, after blinded adjudication. 6,158 patients were enrolled and 4,786 randomized after an active run-in period; median follow-up was 23 months and median weekly dosage 16mg. Of the randomized subjects, 81.2% were male with a median age of 65.0 years and a median body mass index of 31.5 kg/m2. Of 2,391 subjects randomized to LD-MTX, 2080 (87.0%) experienced an AE of interest compared to 1951 of 2,395 (81.5%) randomized to placebo (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.10 – 1.25). The relative hazards of gastrointestinal (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.75 – 2.10), pulmonary (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.16 – 1.98), infectious (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01 – 1.30), and hematologic (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07 – 1.23) AEs were elevated, comparing LD-MTX to placebo. With the exception of an increased risk of skin cancers (HR 2.05 (1.28, 3.28)), there was no difference between treatment arms for the risk of other malignancies, mucocutaneous, neuro-psychiatric, or musculoskeletal AEs. Renal AEs were reduced in subjects randomized to LD-MTX (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 – 0.94). The trial was conducted in non-rheumatic disease patients who tolerated LD-MTX during an active run-in. Use of LD-MTX was associated with small to moderate elevations in risks for skin cancer, gastrointestinal, infectious, pulmonary, and hematologic AEs, while renal AEs were decreased.