5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Dihydroartemisinin induces autophagy and inhibits the growth of iron-loaded human myeloid leukemia K562 cells via ROS toxicity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          ► DHA induced K562 cells autophagy followed by LC3-II protein expression. ► The DHA-induced autophagy might be ROS dependent. ► Inhibition of K562 cell proliferation by DHA was also dependent upon iron decrease.

          Abstract

          Dihydroartemisinin (DHA), an active metabolite of artemisinin derivatives, is the most remarkable anti-malarial drug and has little toxicity to humans. Recent studies have shown that DHA effectively inhibits the growth of cancer cells. In the present study, we intended to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the inhibition of growth of iron-loaded human myeloid leukemia K562 cells by DHA. Mitochondria are important regulators of both autophagy and apoptosis, and one of the triggers for mitochondrial dysfunction is the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We found that the DHA-induced autophagy of leukemia K562 cells, whose intracellular organelles are primarily mitochondria, was ROS dependent. The autophagy of these cells was followed by LC3-II protein expression and caspase-3 activation. In addition, we demonstrated that inhibition of the proliferation of leukemia K562 cells by DHA is also dependent upon iron. This inhibition includes the down-regulation of TfR expression and the induction of K562 cell growth arrest in the G 2/M phase.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Autophagy in cell death: an innocent convict?

          The visualization of autophagosomes in dying cells has led to the belief that autophagy is a nonapoptotic form of programmed cell death. This concept has now been evaluated using cells and organisms deficient in autophagy genes. Most evidence indicates that, at least in cells with intact apoptotic machinery, autophagy is primarily a pro-survival rather than a pro-death mechanism. This review summarizes the evidence linking autophagy to cell survival and cell death, the complex interplay between autophagy and apoptosis pathways, and the role of autophagy-dependent survival and death pathways in clinical diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Eating oneself and uninvited guests: autophagy-related pathways in cellular defense.

            The eukaryotic cell uses an evolutionarily conserved lysosomal pathway of self-digestion (autophagy) for survival when extracellular nutrients are limited. In this issue of Cell, new evidence indicates that autophagy is used to for survival when intracellular nutrients are limited by growth factor deprivation (Lum et al., 2005). Other recent studies indicate that the autophagy machinery is also used to degrade foreign microbial invaders (xenophagy).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring cell death in higher eukaryotes.

              Cell death is essential for a plethora of physiological processes, and its deregulation characterizes numerous human diseases. Thus, the in-depth investigation of cell death and its mechanisms constitutes a formidable challenge for fundamental and applied biomedical research, and has tremendous implications for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. It is, therefore, of utmost importance to standardize the experimental procedures that identify dying and dead cells in cell cultures and/or in tissues, from model organisms and/or humans, in healthy and/or pathological scenarios. Thus far, dozens of methods have been proposed to quantify cell death-related parameters. However, no guidelines exist regarding their use and interpretation, and nobody has thoroughly annotated the experimental settings for which each of these techniques is most appropriate. Here, we provide a nonexhaustive comparison of methods to detect cell death with apoptotic or nonapoptotic morphologies, their advantages and pitfalls. These guidelines are intended for investigators who study cell death, as well as for reviewers who need to constructively critique scientific reports that deal with cellular demise. Given the difficulties in determining the exact number of cells that have passed the point-of-no-return of the signaling cascades leading to cell death, we emphasize the importance of performing multiple, methodologically unrelated assays to quantify dying and dead cells.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                FEBS Open Bio
                FEBS Open Bio
                FEBS Open Bio
                Elsevier
                2211-5463
                23 May 2012
                23 May 2012
                2012
                : 2
                : 103-112
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310058, People’s Republic of China
                [b ]Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, People’s Republic of China
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Fax: +86 571 88208444. zhouhj_zhouhj@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                FOB24
                10.1016/j.fob.2012.05.002
                3642128
                23650588
                1e78d870-c57f-4510-bfd6-ff8fc004f65e
                © 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works License, which permits non- commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 10 February 2012
                : 15 May 2012
                : 16 May 2012
                Categories
                Article

                dha, dihydroartemisinin,pbs, phosphate buffer saline,tfr, transferrin receptor,ros, reactive oxygen species,mtt, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide,ao, acridine orange,eb, ethidium bromide,parp, poly(adp-ribose) polymerases,dihydroartemisinin,ros,mitophagy,k562 cell,iron

                Comments

                Comment on this article