5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      DNA Methylation Markers for Pan-Cancer Prediction by Deep Learning

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          For cancer diagnosis, many DNA methylation markers have been identified. However, few studies have tried to identify DNA methylation markers to diagnose diverse cancer types simultaneously, i.e., pan-cancers. In this study, we tried to identify DNA methylation markers to differentiate cancer samples from the respective normal samples in pan-cancers. We collected whole genome methylation data of 27 cancer types containing 10,140 cancer samples and 3386 normal samples, and divided all samples into five data sets, including one training data set, one validation data set and three test data sets. We applied machine learning to identify DNA methylation markers, and specifically, we constructed diagnostic prediction models by deep learning. We identified two categories of markers: 12 CpG markers and 13 promoter markers. Three of 12 CpG markers and four of 13 promoter markers locate at cancer-related genes. With the CpG markers, our model achieved an average sensitivity and specificity on test data sets as 92.8% and 90.1%, respectively. For promoter markers, the average sensitivity and specificity on test data sets were 89.8% and 81.1%, respectively. Furthermore, in cell-free DNA methylation data of 163 prostate cancer samples, the CpG markers achieved the sensitivity as 100%, and the promoter markers achieved 92%. For both marker types, the specificity of normal whole blood was 100%. To conclude, we identified methylation markers to diagnose pan-cancers, which might be applied to liquid biopsy of cancers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Epigenetic interplay between histone modifications and DNA methylation in gene silencing.

          Knowledge on heritable changes in gene expression that result from epigenetic events is of increasing relevance in the development of strategies for prevention, early diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Histone acetylation and DNA methylation are epigenetic modifications whose patterns can be regarded as heritable marks that ensure accurate transmission of the chromatin states and gene expression profiles over many cell generations. Importantly, patterns and levels of DNA methylation and histone acetylation are profoundly altered in human cancers. Accumulating evidence suggests that an epigenetic cross-talk, i.e. interplay between DNA methylation and histone acetylation, may be involved in the process of gene transcription and aberrant gene silencing in tumours. Although the molecular mechanism of gene activation is relatively well understood, the hierarchical order of events and dependencies leading to gene silencing in the course of cancer development remain largely unknown. While some studies suggest that DNA methylation patterns guide histone modifications (including histone acetylation and methylation) during gene silencing, other studies argue that DNA methylation takes its cues primarily from histone modification states. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the interplay between DNA methylation and histone modifications during gene silencing and its importance in the integration of environmental and intrinsic stimuli in the control of gene expression. We also discuss the importance of an epigenetic cross-talk in the protection against genetic changes in response to environmental genotoxins as well as the implication for cancer therapy and prevention.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Predominant hematopoietic origin of cell-free DNA in plasma and serum after sex-mismatched bone marrow transplantation.

            Despite current interest in the biology and diagnostic applications of cell-free DNA in plasma and serum, the cellular origin of this DNA is poorly understood. We used a sex-mismatched bone marrow transplantation model to study the relative contribution of hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells to circulating DNA. We studied 22 sex-mismatched bone marrow transplantation patients. Paired buffy coat and plasma samples were obtained from all 22 patients. Matching serum samples were also obtained from seven of them. Plasma DNA, serum DNA, and buffy coat were quantified by real-time PCR of the SRY and beta-globin gene DNA. To investigate the effects of blood drawing and other preanalytical variables on plasma DNA concentrations, blood samples were also collected from 14 individuals who had not received transplants. The effects of blood sampling by syringe and needle, centrifugation, and time delay in blood processing were studied. The median percentage of Y-chromosome DNA in the plasma in female patients receiving bone marrow from male donors (59.5%) differed significantly (P <0.001) from that in the male patients receiving bone marrow from female donors (6.9%). This indicated that plasma DNA in the bone marrow transplantation recipients was predominantly of donor origin. Compared with paired plasma samples, serum samples had a median 14-fold higher DNA concentration, with the additional DNA being of donor origin. Control experiments indicated that none of the three tested preanalytical variables contributed to a significant change in cell-free DNA concentration. After bone marrow transplantation, the DNA in plasma and serum is predominantly hematopoietic in origin. Apart from the biological implications of this observation, this finding suggests that plasma and serum can be used as alternative materials for the study of postbone marrow transplantation chimerism.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Genes (Basel)
                Genes (Basel)
                genes
                Genes
                MDPI
                2073-4425
                04 October 2019
                October 2019
                : 10
                : 10
                : 778
                Affiliations
                [1 ]BGI Education Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518083, China; biaoliu2019@ 123456gmail.com (B.L.); liuyulu@ 123456genomics.cn (Y.L.);
                [2 ]Research and Development Department, Shenzhen Byoryn Technology Co.,Ltd, Shenzhen 518000, China; limengyao007@ 123456gmail.com
                [3 ]Department of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: yangsh@ 123456genomics.cn (S.Y.); shuaicli@ 123456gmail.com (S.C.L.)
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1996-1349
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4429-4878
                Article
                genes-10-00778
                10.3390/genes10100778
                6826785
                31590287
                1eaba87a-7e20-4234-beb7-dcba56f7cdf9
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 27 June 2019
                : 30 September 2019
                Categories
                Article

                biomarker,methylation,pan-cancer,deep learning,cpg,promoter
                biomarker, methylation, pan-cancer, deep learning, cpg, promoter

                Comments

                Comment on this article