5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pearls and Pitfalls of Phrenic Nerve Transfer for Shoulder Reconstruction in Brachial Plexus Injury

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives  The purpose of this study was to report the functional outcomes of phrenic nerve transfer (PNT) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) for shoulder reconstruction in brachial plexus injury (BPI) patients with total and C5–8 palsies, and its pulmonary complications.

          Methods  Forty-four out of 127 BPI patients with total and C5–8 palsies who underwent PNT to SSN for shoulder reconstruction were evaluated for functional outcomes in comparison with other types of nerve transfers. Their pulmonary function was analyzed using vital capacity in the percentage of predicted value and Hugh-Jones (HJ) breathless classification. The predisposing factors to develop pulmonary complications in those patients were examined as well.

          Results  PNT to SSN provided a better shoulder range of motion significantly as compared with nerve transfer from C5 root and contralateral C7. The results between PNT and spinal accessory nerve transfer to SSN were comparable in all directions of shoulder motions. There were no significant respiratory symptoms in majority of the patients including six patients who were classified into grade 2 HJ breathlessness grading. Two predisposing factors for poorer pulmonary performance were identified, which were age and body mass index, with cut-off values of younger than 32 years old and less than 23, respectively.

          Conclusions  PNT to SSN can be a reliable reconstructive procedure in restoration of shoulder function in BPI patients with total or C5–8 palsy. The postoperative pulmonary complications can be prevented with vigilant patient selection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Dysfunction of the diaphragm.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of nerve transfers and nerve grafting for traumatic upper plexus palsy: a systematic review and analysis.

            In treating patients with brachial plexus injury, there are no comparative data on the outcomes of nerve grafts or nerve transfers for isolated upper trunk or C5-C6-C7 root injuries. The purpose of our study was to compare, with systematic review, the outcomes for modern intraplexal nerve transfers for shoulder and elbow function with autogenous nerve grafting for upper brachial plexus traumatic injuries. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies in which patients had surgery for traumatic upper brachial plexus palsy within one year of injury and with a minimum follow-up of twelve months. Strength and shoulder and elbow motion were assessed as outcome measures. The Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare outcomes, with an alpha level of 0.05. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Two hundred and forty-seven (83%) and 286 (96%) of 299 patients with nerve transfers achieved elbow flexion strength of grade M4 or greater and M3 or greater, respectively, compared with thirty-two (56%) and forty-seven (82%) of fifty-seven patients with nerve grafts (p < 0.05). Forty (74%) of fifty-four patients with dual nerve transfers for shoulder function had shoulder abduction strength of grade M4 or greater compared with twenty (35%) of fifty-seven patients with nerve transfer to a single nerve and thirteen (46%) of twenty-eight patients with nerve grafts (p < 0.05). The average shoulder abduction and external rotation was 122° (range, 45° to 170°) and 108° (range, 60° to 140°) after dual nerve transfers and 50° (range, 0° to 100°) and 45° (range, 0° to 140°) in patients with nerve transfers to a single nerve. In patients with demonstrated complete traumatic upper brachial plexus injuries of C5-C6, the pooled international data strongly favors dual nerve transfer over traditional nerve grafting for restoration of improved shoulder and elbow function. These data may be helpful to surgeons considering intraoperative options, particularly in cases in which the native nerve root or trunk may appear less than optimal, or when long nerve grafts are contemplated.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A simple standard exercise test and its use for measuring exertion dyspnoea.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj
                J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj
                10.1055/s-00027212
                Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury
                Georg Thieme Verlag KG (Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany )
                1749-7221
                January 2021
                10 February 2021
                : 16
                : 1
                : e1-e9
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ogori Daiichi General Hospital, Yamaguchi City, Yamaguchi Prefecture, Japan
                [2 ]Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                [3 ]Hand surgery, Kusum Orthopedic Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                [4 ]Hand surgery, Wadia Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                [5 ]Hand surgery, Surya Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Kazuteru Doi, MD, PhD Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ogori Daiichi General Hospital Shimogo 862-3, Ogori, Yamaguchi City, Yamaguchi-kenJapan doimicro@ 123456saikyo.or.jp
                Article
                2000004oc
                10.1055/s-0041-1722979
                7875611
                1ecfde09-17ac-4c01-86c5-aa3eb6e642cf
                The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 June 2020
                : 12 October 2020
                Categories
                Original Contribution

                Neurology
                brachial plexus injury,phrenic nerve transfer,suprascapular nerve
                Neurology
                brachial plexus injury, phrenic nerve transfer, suprascapular nerve

                Comments

                Comment on this article