14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Knot Security 101: A Comprehensive Practical Review to Optimal Knot Configuration, Pulling Direction, Throw Count, and Tail Length

      review-article
      , MD * , , , MD
      Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Knots are the weakest structural point in a suture line and inevitably weaken almost all suture materials. This practical review critically evaluates the factors, such as suture material properties, gauge, configuration, throw count, and tail length, that affect knot security.

          Methods:

          A PubMed search between the years 1934 and 2023 identified relevant studies that addressed factors relating to knot security. Studies that investigated knots and sutures solely used in laparoscopic and arthroscopic surgery were excluded. Knot configurations assessed were the Aberdeen, sliding, square, and surgeon’s.

          Results:

          Eighty-six articles were included in this review article and demonstrated that knot security varies greatly between suture materials and gauge. Knot security also varies by configuration, throw count, conditions, tail length, and stitch type. Throw count differs by knot configuration, with the Aberdeen knot being most secure with three throws and one to two turns compared with three to five throws for surgeon’s and square knots. The optimal tail length was 3 mm.

          Conclusions:

          This practical review demonstrates that there are significant differences in knot security based on a variety of factors. It is challenging to propose an ideal knot because most studies did not evaluate knot security using a broad variety of suture materials, gauges, and throws for each of the most common knots. Although this review article demonstrated several applicable findings, additional robust studies are needed to simplify proposals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references84

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The history and evolution of sutures in pelvic surgery.

          The purpose of the study is to review the history and innovations of sutures used in pelvic surgery. Based on a review of the literature using electronic- and hand-searched databases we identified appropriate articles and gynaecology surgical textbooks regarding suture for wound closure. The first documented uses of suture are explored and then the article focuses on the use of knotted materials in pelvic surgery. The development of suture of natural materials is followed chronologically until the present time where synthetic suture is implanted during countless surgeries every day. This millennial history of suture contains an appreciation of the early work of Susruta, Celsus, Paré and Lister, including a survey of some significant developments of suture methods over the last 100 years. Most surgeons know little about the history and science of sutures. A retrospective view of suture is critical to the appreciation of the current work and development of this common tool.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures.

            Sutures are classified into non-absorbable and absorbable, and mechanical properties of these materials vary by the composition. Knotting induces decrease in mechanical properties. The objective of this study was to measure the tensile and knot security properties depending on the type and caliber of sutures. Changes in properties after tensile loading were measured with absorbable sutures. Tensile properties such as maximum tensile load, elongation rate, stiffness and energy absorbed before breakage of seven kinds of surgical sutures were measured. Absorbable sutures were immersed in 37 degrees C Hank's balanced salt solution up to 14 days under the tensile load of 100 g/thread, and properties were measured again. Knot was formed with surgeon's knot method, and tensile properties were measured. Five specimens were tested for each condition. Values were analyzed with one- or two-way analysis of variance (alpha = 0.05). Maximum tensile load of seven sutures (caliber = 4-0) ranged from 10.0 N to 14.3 N. In non-absorbable sutures, the type of suture material influenced the tensile properties (P < 0.05). In absorbable sutures, the maximum tensile load after tensile loading decreased, which was significant in chromic catgut (CC). Knot security of seven sutures (caliber = 4-0) ranged from 8.7 N to 11.9 N. Type of non-absorbable suture influenced knot security (P < 0.05), and the synthetic monofilament materials showed a tendency to be untied easily. Since no single suture material possesses all of the requirements, proper type and caliber suture should be selected based on this study.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The history of sutures.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                GOX
                Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                2169-7574
                August 2024
                09 August 2024
                : 12
                : 8
                : e6047
                Affiliations
                From the [* ]Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Mich.
                []Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
                Author notes
                Jeffrey E. Janis, MD, FACS, 915 Olentangy River Road, Suite 2100, Columbus, OH 43212, E-mail: jeffrey.janis@ 123456osumc.edu , Twitter/X: @jjanismd
                Article
                GOX-D-24-00317 00036
                10.1097/GOX.0000000000006047
                11319322
                39139841
                1ed40506-2dad-425b-b28b-ebeb8a1de1c4
                Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 20 March 2024
                : 5 June 2024
                Categories
                Education
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                UNITED STATES
                T

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log