4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Eco-evo-devo implications and archaeobiological perspectives of trait covariance in fruits of wild and domesticated grapevines

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The phenotypic changes that occurred during the domestication and diversification of grapevine are well known, particularly changes in seed morphology, but the functional causes and consequences behind these variations are poorly understood. Wild and domesticate grapes differ, among others, in the form of their pips: wild grapes produce roundish pips with short stalks and cultivated varieties have more elongated pips with longer stalks. Such variations of form are of first importance for archaeobotany since the pip form is, most often, the only remaining information in archaeological settings. This study aims to enlighten archaeobotanical record and grapevine pip development by better understanding how size and shape (co)variates between pip and berry in both wild and domesticated Vitis vinifera. The covariation of berry size, number of seeds per berry (“piposity”), pip size and pip shape were explored on 49 grapevine accessions sampled among Euro-Mediterranean traditional cultivars and wild grapevines. We show that for wild grapevine, the higher the piposity, the bigger the berry and the more elongated the pip. For both wild and domesticated grapevine, the longer is the pip, the more it has a “domesticated” shape. Consequences for archaeobotanical studies are tested and discussed, and these covariations allowed the inference of berry dimensions from archaeological pips from a Southern France Roman site. This systematic exploration sheds light on new aspects of pip-berry relationship, in both size and shape, on grapevine eco-evo-devo changes during domestication, and invites to explore further the functional ecology of grapevine pip and berry and notably the impact of cultivation practices and human selection on grapevine morphology.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Welcome to the Tidyverse

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies

            It is difficult to overstate the cultural and biological impacts that the domestication of plants and animals has had on our species. Fundamental questions regarding where, when, and how many times domestication took place have been of primary interest within a wide range of academic disciplines. Within the last two decades, the advent of new archaeological and genetic techniques has revolutionized our understanding of the pattern and process of domestication and agricultural origins that led to our modern way of life. In the spring of 2011, 25 scholars with a central interest in domestication representing the fields of genetics, archaeobotany, zooarchaeology, geoarchaeology, and archaeology met at the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center to discuss recent domestication research progress and identify challenges for the future. In this introduction to the resulting Special Feature, we present the state of the art in the field by discussing what is known about the spatial and temporal patterns of domestication, and controversies surrounding the speed, intentionality, and evolutionary aspects of the domestication process. We then highlight three key challenges for future research. We conclude by arguing that although recent progress has been impressive, the next decade will yield even more substantial insights not only into how domestication took place, but also when and where it did, and where and why it did not.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Momocs: Outline Analysis UsingR

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curation
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Resources
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                6 November 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 11
                : e0239863
                Affiliations
                [1 ] ISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France
                [2 ] Équipe « Dynamique de la biodiversité, anthropo-écologie », CC065 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
                [3 ] Laurentian Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, Québec, Canada
                [4 ] UMR AGAP, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Equipe « Diversité, Adaptation et Amélioration de la Vigne », Montpellier, France
                National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, INDIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-6349
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3633-9829
                Article
                PONE-D-20-10713
                10.1371/journal.pone.0239863
                7647109
                33156832
                1efb5a54-8928-4449-b841-a0dbcb2a6d64
                © 2020 Bonhomme et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 22 April 2020
                : 15 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 2, Pages: 22
                Funding
                Funded by: ANR
                Award ID: ANR-16-CE27-0013
                Award Recipient :
                ANR project “Vignes et vins en France du Néolithique au Moyen Âge. Approche intégrée en archéosciences” (PI: Laurent Bouby) https://anr.fr/Projet-ANR-16-CE27-0013.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Domestic Animals
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animals
                Domestic Animals
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Plants
                Flowering Plants
                Grapevine
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Plants
                Fruits
                Berries
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Beverages
                Alcoholic Beverages
                Wine
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Beverages
                Alcoholic Beverages
                Wine
                Social Sciences
                Archaeology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Plants
                Fruits
                Grapes
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Probability Theory
                Random Variables
                Covariance
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Statistical Methods
                Multivariate Analysis
                Principal Component Analysis
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics
                Statistical Methods
                Multivariate Analysis
                Principal Component Analysis
                Custom metadata
                The full tables analysed are available (and citable) as: Bonhomme V, Picq S, Ivorra S, Pastor T. BerryPip dataset. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12696602.v2.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article