26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments

      , , , ,
      Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Studies of test-retest reliability for health-related quality of life instruments have used varying intervals between test administrations. There is no evidence available to aid in the selection of the time interval between questionnaire administrations for a study of test-retest reliability for health status instruments. We compared the test-retest reliability at 2 days and 2 weeks for four knee-rating scales and the eight domains of the SF-36. Seventy patients with disorders of the knee who were in a stable state were randomly allocated to repeat the questionnaires at either 2 days or 2 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in the test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient and limits of agreement statistics) for the two time intervals.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
          Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
          Elsevier BV
          08954356
          August 2003
          August 2003
          : 56
          : 8
          : 730-735
          Article
          10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00084-2
          12954464
          1f0efefc-a6d8-4eb1-8f9a-068ce7358e02
          © 2003

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          Related Documents Log