4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Workplace incivility: the impact on the Malaysian public service department

      , ,
      European Journal of Training and Development
      Emerald

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          This study aims to investigate the implication of workplace incivility among employees in the public service department in Putrajaya involving job satisfaction, work stress, psychological contract, knowledge sharing and work engagement.

          Design/methodology/approach

          This cross-sectional study examines the implication of workplace incivility among 180 employees in the Malaysian public service organization. Purposive sampling was used in this study. Partial least square was used to examine the measurement and the structural model of this study.

          Findings

          The result demonstrated that workplace incivility was associated with the psychological contract, job satisfaction, work stress and work engagement. The study also found that workplace incivility does not impact knowledge sharing in the public service organization department.

          Practical implications

          Future research could provide a more broadened scope to ensure the generalization of the results for the overall public service in Malaysia. Human resource development researchers could look into experimental studies to raise the awareness of workplace incivility that may lead to the decline of workplace incivility.

          Originality/value

          The research could trigger more empirical research toward understanding the phenomenon and implication of workplace incivility in the perspective of Malaysian public service organizations specifically in Asian countries, which are currently limited.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.

            Despite the concern that has been expressed about potential method biases, and the pervasiveness of research settings with the potential to produce them, there is disagreement about whether they really are a problem for researchers in the behavioral sciences. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to explore the current state of knowledge about method biases. First, we explore the meaning of the terms "method" and "method bias" and then we examine whether method biases influence all measures equally. Next, we review the evidence of the effects that method biases have on individual measures and on the covariation between different constructs. Following this, we evaluate the procedural and statistical remedies that have been used to control method biases and provide recommendations for minimizing method bias.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                European Journal of Training and Development
                EJTD
                Emerald
                2046-9012
                2046-9012
                October 30 2020
                May 13 2022
                October 30 2020
                May 13 2022
                : 46
                : 3/4
                : 356-372
                Article
                10.1108/EJTD-02-2020-0031
                1f1827c6-b88b-4873-b0c1-608fed8612ba
                © 2022

                https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article