49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before December 31, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 2.2 Impact Factor I 5.8 CiteScore I 0.782 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Serum Testosterone Levels Are Not Modified by Vitamin D Supplementation in Dialysis Patients and Healthy Subjects

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: Low serum testosterone is related to increased mortality in male dialysis patients. An association of vitamin D status with serum androgen levels with concordant seasonal variation has been described, but it is undecided whether vitamin D supplementation improves testosterone levels. Methods: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind manner, we investigated the effects of an oral vitamin D supplementation in healthy subjects and hemodialysis patients on testosterone levels. One hundred three healthy individuals received cholecalciferol 800 IE/day ( n = 52) or placebo ( n = 51) for 12 weeks. Thirty-three hemodialysis patients received cholecalciferol adapted to their serum levels following current guidelines ( n = 15) or placebo ( n = 18) for 12 weeks. Results: In healthy individuals, 25(OH)D3 levels rose significantly in the verum group (38.1 ± 13.7 vs. 72.5 ± 15.4 nmol/L, p < 0.001), whereas in the placebo group, levels dropped (37.7 ± 14.7 vs. 31.9 ± 13.1, p < 0.001). Testosterone levels did not change significantly (verum, males: 20.9 ± 6.6 vs. 20.5 ± 7.9 nmol/L, p = 0.6; verum, females: 0.9 ± 0.5 vs. 0.92 ± 0.5, p = 0.4; placebo, males: 18.5 ± 10.2 vs. 21.8 ± 16.5, p = 0.07, placebo, females: 1.6 ± 4.2 vs. 1.6 ± 4.9, p = 0.6). In dialysis patients, the mean cholecalciferol level was only 32.3 ± 17.8 nmol/L, with only 2% of the values being within the normal range. Cholecalciferol levels normalized in the verum group (29.4 ± 11.2 vs. 87.8 ± 22.3, p < 0.001), whereas levels dropped further in the placebo group (33.6 ± 16.6 vs. 24.6 ± 8.0 nmol/L, p < 0.001). Testosterone levels did not change significantly (verum, males: 8.0 ± 3.7 vs. 7.8 ± 3.8, p = 0.8; verum, females: 1.3 ± 1.0 vs. 1.2 ± 1.0 nmol/L, p = 0.5; placebo, males: 11.9 ± 5.0 vs. 11.6 ± 4.0 nmol/L, p = 0.6; placebo, females: 0.8 ± 0.5 vs. 0.7 ± 0.4 nmol/L, p = 0.8). Conclusion: Serum testosterone levels in hemodialysis patients and healthy individuals are independent from vitamin D status and cannot be significantly increased by cholecalciferol supplementation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Vitamin D is significantly associated with total testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin in Malaysian men.

          Cross-sectional studies in the Caucasian population have shown a significant relationship between vitamin D and testosterone levels, but data in the Asian population are limited. This study aimed to determine the association between vitamin D and testosterone levels in Malaysian men.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Influence of Cholecalciferol Supplementation in Hemodialysis Patients on Monocyte Subsets: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

            Background/Aims: Although most hemodialysis patients share a significant 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] deficiency, supplementation is controversially discussed. A potential influence on monocyte and T lymphocyte dysfunction advocates blood level-adapted supplementation as recommended by K/DOQI guidelines. This was a prospective double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial examining immune effects of 12 weeks of cholecalciferol supplementation. Methods: We initiated serum level-adapted de novo cholecalciferol supplementation in 38 hemodialysis patients. Outcome measures were: monocyte subset cell counts (CD14+CD16++ vs. CD14++CD16+ vs. CD14++CD16-), lymphocyte Th1/Th2 differentiation frequencies, serum inflammatory proteins CRP and TNFα, parathyroid hormone (PTH), FGF-23, and α-Klotho. Results: At baseline, the mean 25(OH)D serum level in the study population was 31.7 ± 14.3 nmol/l, and only 3% of patients had levels within the normal range. At 12 weeks, 25(OH)D levels were normalized in the verum group (87.8 ± 22.3 vs. placebo 24.6 ± 8.0 nmol/l, p 2 D levels increased in the verum group. Monocyte subset cell counts as well as Th1 and Th2 lymphocyte frequencies did not change significantly after 12 weeks of cholecalciferol supplementation. There was also no significant difference in PTH, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, phosphate, TNFα, FGF-23, α-Klotho and CRP levels. Conclusions: Oral cholecalciferol supplementation according to the K/DOQI recommendations normalizes 25(OH)D levels without relevant side effects such as hyperphosphatemia or hypercalcemia. However, beneficial pleiotropic effects on monocyte subset cell counts, T cell differentiation, or cytokine production could not be confirmed at least at the used dosage. PTH and FGF23 levels were not affected during cholecalciferol administration.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Low serum testosterone increases mortality risk among male dialysis patients

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NEF
                Nephron
                10.1159/issn.1660-8151
                Nephron
                S. Karger AG
                1660-8151
                2235-3186
                2021
                September 2021
                09 June 2021
                : 145
                : 5
                : 481-485
                Affiliations
                [_a] aInternal Medicine II, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
                [_b] bCentral Laboratory, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
                [_c] cInstitute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
                [_d] dNephrologische Kooperation Villingen-Schwenningen, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7429-381X
                Article
                516636 Nephron 2021;145:481–485
                10.1159/000516636
                34107473
                1f1b05f1-9a1e-4b5d-b36f-6368ef7f2fbf
                © 2021 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

                This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 12 November 2020
                : 07 April 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Pages: 5
                Categories
                Clinical Practice: Research Article

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Hemodialysis,Vitamin D,Testosterone
                Cardiovascular Medicine, Nephrology
                Hemodialysis, Vitamin D, Testosterone

                Comments

                Comment on this article