11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “Selection of the Optimal L-asparaginase II Against Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: An In Silico Approach”

      author-comment
      , BTECH 1 , , BTECH 1 , , BTECH 1 , , BTECH 1 , , PhD 1 ,
      JMIRx Med
      JMIR Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Selection of the Optimal L-asparaginase II Against Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: An In Silico Approach

          Background L-asparaginase II (asnB), a periplasmic protein commercially extracted from E coli and Erwinia , is often used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia. L-asparaginase is an enzyme that converts L-asparagine to aspartic acid and ammonia. Cancer cells are dependent on asparagine from other sources for growth, and when these cells are deprived of asparagine by the action of the enzyme, the cancer cells selectively die. Objective Questions remain as to whether asnB from E coli and Erwinia is the best asparaginase as they have many side effects. asnBs with the lowest Michaelis constant (Km; most potent) and lowest immunogenicity are considered the most optimal enzymes. In this paper, we have attempted the development of a method to screen for optimal enzymes that are better than commercially available enzymes. Methods In this paper, the asnB sequence of E coli was used to search for homologous proteins in different bacterial and archaeal phyla, and a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed. The sequences that are most distant from E coli and Erwinia were considered the best candidates in terms of immunogenicity and were chosen for further processing. The structures of these proteins were built by homology modeling, and asparagine was docked with these proteins to calculate the binding energy. Results asnBs from Streptomyces griseus , Streptomyces venezuelae , and Streptomyces collinus were found to have the highest binding energy (–5.3 kcal/mol, –5.2 kcal/mol, and –5.3 kcal/mol, respectively; higher than the E coli and Erwinia asnBs) and were predicted to have the lowest Kms, as we found that there is an inverse relationship between binding energy and Km. Besides predicting the most optimal asparaginase, this technique can also be used to predict the most optimal enzymes where the substrate is known and the structure of one of the homologs is solved. Conclusions We have devised an in silico method to predict the enzyme kinetics from a sequence of an enzyme along with being able to screen for optimal alternative asnBs against acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Peer Review of “Selection of the Optimal L-asparaginase II Against Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: An In Silico Approach”

            (2021)
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Peer Review of “Selection of the Optimal L-asparaginase II Against Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: An In Silico Approach“

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIRx Med
                JMIRx Med
                JMIRxMed
                JMIRx Med
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2563-6316
                Jul-Sep 2021
                8 September 2021
                : 2
                : 3
                : e33217
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Biotechnology Kathmandu University Dhulikhel Nepal
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Hitesh Kumar Bhattarai hitesh321@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0602-2716
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1328-4693
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4990-5874
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4399-2041
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7147-1411
                Article
                v2i3e33217
                10.2196/33217
                10414483
                1f6181ea-33c3-47d2-9086-c0c1c57e2137
                ©Adesh Baral, Ritesh Gorkhali, Amit Basnet, Shubham Koirala, Hitesh Kumar Bhattarai. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 08.09.2021.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 27 August 2021
                : 27 August 2021
                Categories
                Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews
                Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log