7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Attempt to improve transcutaneous bilirubinometry: a double-blind study of Medick BiliMed versus Respironics BiliCheck.

      Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
      Bilirubin, blood, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Jaundice, Neonatal, diagnosis, Light, diagnostic use, Male, Neonatal Screening, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Spectrum Analysis, instrumentation, methods, Treatment Outcome

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To compare the accuracy of a new transcutaneous bilirubinometer, BiliMed (Medick SA, Paris, France) with BiliCheck (Respironics, Marietta, GA, USA), a widely available instrument, and with total serum bilirubin measurement. A prospective double-blind study comparing the two devices was carried out. 686 healthy newborns needing measurement of their bilirubin were enrolled over a 4-month period. Serum and transcutaneous bilirubin measurements were taken with both devices within 15 minutes. The order of use of the instruments was randomised. Well-baby nursery ward in a university hospital, tertiary referral centre. The linear regression analysis showed a better correlation between BiliCheck and serum bilirubin (r = 0.75) than between BiliMed and serum bilirubin (r = 0.45). BiliCheck variability (+/-2 SD of the mean bias from serum bilirubin) was within -87.2 to 63.3 micromol/l, while BiliMed variability was within -97.5 to 121.4 micromol/l. The receiver operating characteristic analysis (for serum bilirubin levels >205.2 micromol/l or >239.4 micromol/l) showed significantly higher areas under the curve for BiliCheck than those for BiliMed (p<0.001). Despite the potential practical advantages of BiliMed, its reduced diagnostic accuracy in comparison with BiliCheck does not justify its use in clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          Related Documents Log