6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to the journal, click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE POLICY IN AFRICA: THE RIVALRY BETWEEN CHINA AND JAPAN

      1 , 2 , 3
      Journal of International Studies
      UUM Press

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper aims to analyze the China and Japan rivalry on economic assistance policy in Africa using a qualitative method and national interest as the conceptual framework. The land of Africa has abundant reserves of natural resources, such as dense forestry and mineral resources which naturally will attract foreign investors. The first foreign investors in Africa were westerners. Within the grip of their iron fists, Africa experienced a bitter history of slavery and colonialization. This rooted problem remains unresolved and causes a significant political atrophy until this day, and has resulted in the incapability of the Africa nations to resolve their own respective problems. Given such a state of affairs, these former colonies in Africa have always been longing for foreign assistance, especially after the post-Cold War Era. Thus, the abandonment of former colonies gave the opportunity for the Eastern powers, such China and Japan to establish a foothold in Africa, namely Japan with its Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD) and China its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Through the TICAD, Japan emphasizes the importance of “Africa’s Ownership” in all its infrastructure development cooperation initiatives. On the other hand, Chinese assistance can be characterised as indiscriminate, reciprocal, and non-interference in internal affairs. This paper suggests that both China and Japan have their own respective agenda on how to conduct diplomacy in Africa. They even share the same goals vis-a-vis Africa, which are economic and political domination and a keen interest in exploiting the available natural energy resources. 

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Indonesia
          Indonesia
          Indonesia
          Journal
          Journal of International Studies
          UUM Press
          August 30 2023
          : 19
          : 189-214
          Affiliations
          [1 ]International Relation, Asia-Pacific Regional Studies, National Dong Hwa University, Taiwan
          [2 ]International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Christian University of Indonesia, Indonesia
          [3 ]Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Christian University of Indonesia, Indonesia
          Article
          12697
          10.32890/jis2023.19.2.7
          1fbdf9e6-668a-44e8-9229-1e1da0580bff

          All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

          History

          International economics & Trade,Labor & Demographic economics,Public economics,Quantitative finance,Political economics

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          Related Documents Log