16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Examining privilege and power in US urban parks and open space during the double crises of antiblack racism and COVID-19

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this perspective, we argue that creating the positive outcomes socio-ecological researchers and practitioners seek for urban areas requires acknowledging and addressing the interactions of race and systemic racism in parks, open and green spaces. Racial experiences are inseparable from physical landscapes and the processes of designing, managing, or studying them. From COVID-19 to the Black Lives Matter movement and protests, the events of 2020 in the United States underscore how considerations of social justice must extend beyond the conventional distributional focus of environmental justice. It must incorporate an understanding of how the built environment is racialized spatially, but not always readily quantified through the proximity-based measurements frequently used in research and practice. The perspective is organized in three main parts. The first part presents a series of vignettes to frame the ways cities and individuals participate, respond, and interact under COVID-19 with racial segregation as the backdrop. The second part suggests a stepwise approach to building an understanding of racial inequities in socio-ecological systems (SES) research and practice including four entry points: (1) racialized spatial distribution of hazards and amenities, (2) racialized qualities of space, (3) racialized people in space, and (4) racialized creation of space. Finally, the third part proposes actions the SES community can take to enhance our commitment to community recovery, improvement, and thrivability. This perspective cautions practitioners and researchers against opportunistic or quick-fix solutions, and instead challenges our colleagues to be inclusive of disenfranchised voices in shaping socio-ecological goals, now more than ever. The goal of this perspective is to spark engagement with power and privilege in parks and open space using the example of COVID-19 and race in the US.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?

              To investigate the strength of the relation between the amount of green space in people's living environment and their perceived general health. This relation is analysed for different age and socioeconomic groups. Furthermore, it is analysed separately for urban and more rural areas, because the strength of the relation was expected to vary with urbanity. The study includes 250 782 people registered with 104 general practices who filled in a self administered form on sociodemographic background and perceived general health. The percentage of green space (urban green space, agricultural space, natural green space) within a one kilometre and three kilometre radius around the postal code coordinates was calculated for each household. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed at three levels-that is, individual level, family level, and practice level-controlled for sociodemographic characteristics. The percentage of green space inside a one kilometre and a three kilometre radius had a significant relation to perceived general health. The relation was generally present at all degrees of urbanity. The overall relation is somewhat stronger for lower socioeconomic groups. Elderly, youth, and secondary educated people in large cities seem to benefit more from presence of green areas in their living environment than other groups in large cities. This research shows that the percentage of green space in people's living environment has a positive association with the perceived general health of residents. Green space seems to be more than just a luxury and consequently the development of green space should be allocated a more central position in spatial planning policy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                fhoover@sesync.org
                tclim@vt.edu
                Journal
                Socio Ecol Pract Res
                Socio-Ecological Practice Research
                Springer Singapore (Singapore )
                2524-5279
                2524-5287
                24 November 2020
                : 1-16
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.484514.8, National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, ; 1 Park Pl Suite 300, Annapolis, MD 21401 USA
                [2 ]Urban Affairs and Planning, Architecture Annex #207, 140 Otey St., Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7896-4964
                Article
                70
                10.1007/s42532-020-00070-3
                7684571
                34778707
                1fcc66d5-e7ec-4563-9a3e-eccbe00e433d
                © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 31 July 2020
                : 17 October 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: School of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Tech
                Categories
                Perspective Essay

                covid-19,race,parks,open space,environmental justice,cities
                covid-19, race, parks, open space, environmental justice, cities

                Comments

                Comment on this article