25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Study Protocol for Better Evidence for Selecting Transplant Fluids (BEST-Fluids): a pragmatic, registry-based, multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of intravenous fluid therapy with Plasma-Lyte 148 versus 0.9% saline on delayed graft function in deceased donor kidney transplantation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Delayed graft function, the requirement for dialysis due to poor kidney function post-transplant, is a frequent complication of deceased donor kidney transplantation and is associated with inferior outcomes and higher costs. Intravenous fluids given during and after transplantation may affect the risk of poor kidney function after transplant. The most commonly used fluid, isotonic sodium chloride (0.9% saline), contains a high chloride concentration, which may be associated with acute kidney injury, and could increase the risk of delayed graft function. Whether using a balanced, low-chloride fluid instead of 0.9% saline is safe and improves kidney function after deceased donor kidney transplantation is unknown.

          Methods

          BEST-Fluids is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, registry-based, multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. The primary objective is to compare the effect of intravenous Plasma-Lyte 148 (Plasmalyte), a balanced, low-chloride solution, with the effect of 0.9% saline on the incidence of delayed graft function in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. From January 2018 onwards, 800 participants admitted for deceased donor kidney transplantation will be recruited over 3 years in Australia and New Zealand. Participants are randomized 1:1 to either intravenous Plasmalyte or 0.9% saline peri-operatively and until 48 h post-transplant, or until fluid is no longer required; whichever comes first. Follow up is for 1 year. The primary outcome is the incidence of delayed graft function, defined as dialysis in the first 7 days post-transplant. Secondary outcomes include early kidney transplant function (composite of dialysis duration and rate of improvement in graft function when dialysis is not required), hyperkalemia, mortality, graft survival, graft function, quality of life, healthcare resource use, and cost-effectiveness. Participants are enrolled, randomized, and followed up using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry.

          Discussion

          If using Plasmalyte instead of 0.9% saline is effective at reducing delayed graft function and improves other clinical outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation, this simple, inexpensive change to using a balanced low-chloride intravenous fluid at the time of transplantation could be easily implemented in the vast majority of transplant settings worldwide.

          Trial registration

          Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617000358347. Registered on 8 March 2017. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03829488. Registered on 4 February 2019.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults.

            Administration of traditional chloride-liberal intravenous fluids may precipitate acute kidney injury (AKI). To assess the association of a chloride-restrictive (vs chloride-liberal) intravenous fluid strategy with AKI in critically ill patients. Prospective, open-label, sequential period pilot study of 760 patients admitted consecutively to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the control period (February 18 to August 17, 2008) compared with 773 patients admitted consecutively during the intervention period (February 18 to August 17, 2009) at a university-affiliated hospital in Melbourne, Australia. During the control period, patients received standard intravenous fluids. After a 6-month phase-out period (August 18, 2008, to February 17, 2009), any use of chloride-rich intravenous fluids (0.9% saline, 4% succinylated gelatin solution, or 4% albumin solution) was restricted to attending specialist approval only during the intervention period; patients instead received a lactated solution (Hartmann solution), a balanced solution (Plasma-Lyte 148), and chloride-poor 20% albumin. The primary outcomes included increase from baseline to peak creatinine level in the ICU and incidence of AKI according to the risk, injury, failure, loss, end-stage (RIFLE) classification. Secondary post hoc analysis outcomes included the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), length of stay in ICU and hospital, and survival. RESULTS Chloride administration decreased by 144 504 mmol (from 694 to 496 mmol/patient) from the control period to the intervention period. Comparing the control period with the intervention period, the mean serum creatinine level increase while in the ICU was 22.6 μmol/L (95% CI, 17.5-27.7 μmol/L) vs 14.8 μmol/L (95% CI, 9.8-19.9 μmol/L) (P = .03), the incidence of injury and failure class of RIFLE-defined AKI was 14% (95% CI, 11%-16%; n = 105) vs 8.4% (95% CI, 6.4%-10%; n = 65) (P <.001), and the use of RRT was 10% (95% CI, 8.1%-12%; n = 78) vs 6.3% (95% CI, 4.6%-8.1%; n = 49) (P = .005). After adjustment for covariates, this association remained for incidence of injury and failure class of RIFLE-defined AKI (odds ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.37-0.75]; P <.001) and use of RRT (odds ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.33-0.81]; P = .004). There were no differences in hospital mortality, hospital or ICU length of stay, or need for RRT after hospital discharge. CONCLUSION The implementation of a chloride-restrictive strategy in a tertiary ICU was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of AKI and use of RRT. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00885404.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery

              Guidelines to promote the early recovery of patients undergoing major surgery recommend a restrictive intravenous-fluid strategy for abdominal surgery. However, the supporting evidence is limited, and there is concern about impaired organ perfusion.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                michael.collins@adhb.govt.nz
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                25 May 2020
                25 May 2020
                2020
                : 21
                : 428
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.414055.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9027 2851, Department of Renal Medicine, Auckland District Health Board, , Auckland City Hospital, ; Auckland, New Zealand
                [2 ]GRID grid.9654.e, ISNI 0000 0004 0372 3343, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, , University of Auckland, ; Auckland, New Zealand
                [3 ]GRID grid.1003.2, ISNI 0000 0000 9320 7537, Australasian Kidney Trials Network, , The University of Queensland, ; Brisbane, Australia
                [4 ]GRID grid.412744.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0380 2017, Department of Nephrology, , Princess Alexandra Hospital, ; Brisbane, Australia
                [5 ]GRID grid.430453.5, ISNI 0000 0004 0565 2606, Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, , South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), ; Adelaide, Australia
                [6 ]GRID grid.1010.0, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7304, Department of Medicine, , The University of Adelaide, ; Adelaide, Australia
                [7 ]GRID grid.416075.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0367 1221, Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, , Royal Adelaide Hospital, ; Adelaide, Australia
                [8 ]GRID grid.1013.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, , The University of Sydney, ; Sydney, Australia
                [9 ]GRID grid.414055.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9027 2851, Department of Critical Care Medicine, , Auckland City Hospital, ; Auckland, New Zealand
                [10 ]GRID grid.410678.c, Department of Nephrology, , Austin Health, ; Melbourne, Australia
                [11 ]GRID grid.1008.9, ISNI 0000 0001 2179 088X, Department of Medicine (Austin), , The University of Melbourne, ; Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
                [12 ]GRID grid.410678.c, Department of Anaesthesia, , Austin Health, ; Melbourne, Australia
                [13 ]GRID grid.1008.9, ISNI 0000 0001 2179 088X, Department of Surgery, , Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, ; Melbourne, Australia
                [14 ]GRID grid.413249.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0385 0051, Department of Renal Medicine, , Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, ; Sydney, Australia
                [15 ]GRID grid.1013.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, Charles Perkins Centre, , The University of Sydney, ; Sydney, Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2169-9087
                Article
                4359
                10.1186/s13063-020-04359-2
                7249430
                32450917
                2008ef0b-86df-4e01-80cf-04b3977f7f6f
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 3 April 2020
                : 28 April 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Health Research Council of New Zealand
                Award ID: 17/414
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003921, Department of Health, Australian Government;
                Award ID: APP1152390
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007658, Baxter Healthcare Corporation;
                Award ID: Baxter Medication Delivery Grant 2017
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001232, Royal Australasian College of Physicians;
                Award ID: Jacquot Research Establishment Award 2017
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000925, National Health and Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: APP1092957
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Medicine
                balanced crystalloid,delayed graft function,end-stage kidney disease,intravenous fluids,kidney transplantation,peri-operative care,plasma-lyte 148,pragmatic trial,registry trial,normal saline

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content88

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors847