18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pandemic medicine: the management of advanced melanoma during COVID-19

      editorial
      1 , * , 2
      Melanoma Management
      Future Medicine Ltd
      COVID-19, immune checkpoint inhibitors, melanoma, safety

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Amid the COVID-19 pandemic cancer patients present a unique challenge, as they are often immunosuppressed or subject to treatment-related toxicities that may cause severe disease manifestations. The practical impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of advanced melanoma warrants further consideration. Restrictions on the US healthcare system to mitigate COVID-19 transmission have significantly altered melanoma management practices from the initial diagnosis of primary cutaneous disease to systemic treatment for advanced and metastatic presentations. We herein report our experience and recommendations for this patient population, highlighting the importance patient-centered planning based on tumor characteristics, resource availability and the local state of COVID-19 control. Background COVID-19 originated in late 2019, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2, and has since expanded to pandemic levels, causing unparalleled strain on global financial and healthcare systems. While often presenting with nonspecific symptomatology, including dyspnea, fever and cough, a wide-range of more severe presentations have been documented. These severe complications include respiratory failure, sepsis, kidney injury, vasculitis and even neurologic damage. Management has largely emphasized mitigating transmission and protecting vulnerable populations with underlying medical conditions with early evidence for modest efficacy of antiviral therapies. Cancer patients present a unique challenge, as this population is often immunosuppressed and treated with medications that carry a significant risk for toxicities that may predispose patients to severe complications. In fact, cancer patients, particularly those with pulmonary involvement, have been documented to have a higher incidence of COVID-19 infection and rate of severe disease [1,2]. With approximately 80,000 new cases of melanoma annually in the USA, the impact of COVID-19 on the management of melanoma warrants further consideration [3]. This paper aimed to synthesize our experience and recommendations for the management of patients with advanced melanoma during the COVID-19 pandemic. Management of primary disease Although beyond the scope of this paper, changes to the initial management of localized melanoma are also a salient concern. Since melanoma is usually first identified through routine skin exams or in response to a changing cutaneous lesion, restrictions or hesitance to attend these appointments may lead to delayed diagnosis and possibly upstaging. Telehealth initiatives and electronic solutions may provide appropriate outlets for initial melanoma screening and evaluation, although challenges remain [4]. In addition, patients with confirmed melanoma may experience delays in surgical resection and lymph node staging, if applicable. Fortunately, most surgeries for active cancer management have not been subject to stringent restrictions on elective procedures in most regions. Management of advanced disease Metastatic or unresectable disease, however, requires more urgent initiation of systemic therapy. Prior to making decisions on the initiation or continuation of these therapies now in the COVID-19 era, there are several factors that should be considered on an individualized, patient by patient basis. In general, these considerations include: the aggressiveness of the patient’s disease; the dosing schedule and ability to receive treatment at home or outpatient facilities; the risk and toxicity profile of treatment and the state of COVID-19 in the local hospital system and availability of resources for protection and management. At this time, there is no clear evidence that immune stimulating or cytotoxic agents worsen outcomes with COVID-19 although this remains a topic of ongoing, intensive study [5]. In this patient population, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as standard therapy. Overall, these agents have produced a 5-year overall survival rates of 40–50% [6]. Notably, these agents can precipitate immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by aberrant immune cell activation targeting host tissues, which often require immunosuppressive therapies and hospitalization for management. Patients that require prolonged or high-dose immunosuppressants could be at increased risk for COVID-19 transmission and severe disease, as well as iatrogenic complications from hospitalization. In addition to the risks of immunosuppressive therapy, an irAE of particular interest is pneumonitis. With the significant pulmonary involvement of COVID-19 and often severe manifestations of pneumonitis, a combination of the two presents a potentially life-threatening scenario. Other overlapping clinical presentations may occur, including hepatitis and myocarditis, which can mimic their COVID-19 induced analogs [7]. Therefore, if possible, medication selection and dosing regimens should be optimized. For example, anti-PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab), are often combined with CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab). Although increasing the response rates and progression-free survival in patients with metastatic melanoma, the addition of ipilimumab significantly increases the risk of severe irAEs from 15–20 to 50–60% compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy [8]. With a goal of reducing the need for immunosuppressive therapy, the risk of COVID-19 transmission from hospitalization, and the rate of potentially severe auto-inflammation, the use of ipilimumab should be thoughtfully considered. We suggest that most patients, therefore, in the absence of bulky, symptomatic disease, active brain metastases or other adverse prognostic features, preferentially receive anti-PD-1 monotherapy during this time. In addition, in the case of a patient testing positive for COVID-19 while receiving ICI, treatment should be held for at least 1 week following symptom resolution to avoid the theoretical risk of developing concurrent pneumonitis. Another consideration while on ICI therapy is the dosing schedule. Although instituting strict screening procedures and incorporating social distancing may mitigate the risk, any contact with the healthcare system can present a possibility of COVID-19 transmission. Partly in response to the pandemic, the US FDA accelerated approval to use pembrolizumab every 6 weeks, compared with the previous standard of every 3 weeks [9]. Nivolumab may also be administered every 4 weeks. Some regions may also have options for home-care infusion, although it is not clear how often this will occur. Some patients may also consider discontinuing therapy following an extended duration (e.g., patients with a complete response following 1–2 years of therapy) or pausing therapy in areas of high COVID-19 prevalence. Targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors also may be an option for patients with metastatic melanoma harboring BRAF V600 mutations. Currently, there is no evidence that BRAF and MEK inhibitors either hinder the antiviral immune response or exacerbate harmful inflammation if an infection occurs. Thus, one could consider using BRAF/MEK inhibition when indicated without obvious restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. After metastatic disease is controlled, there are aspects to consider with further management. In the case of isolated areas of metastatic disease, surgical resection and radiotherapy may be effective options. A few considerations include the risk and benefit of delaying therapy, the ICU capacity if surgical treatment requires prolonged postoperative observation and the availability of protected rooms and equipment for the patient. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has placed extreme strain on the USA healthcare system and caused significant protocol changes to care for patients with melanoma. From initial screening to treatment of metastatic disease, practices have changed to restrict contact with the healthcare system and ensure proper protective measures are in place to limit transmission to this vulnerable patient population. Overall, these changes highlight the importance of creating an individualized plan for the patient based on tumor characteristics, resource availability and the local state of COVID-19 control.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China

          China and the rest of the world are experiencing an outbreak of a novel betacoronavirus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). 1 By Feb 12, 2020, the rapid spread of the virus had caused 42 747 cases and 1017 deaths in China and cases have been reported in 25 countries, including the USA, Japan, and Spain. WHO has declared 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, a public health emergency of international concern. In contrast to severe acute respiratory system coronavirus and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, more deaths from COVID-19 have been caused by multiple organ dysfunction syndrome rather than respiratory failure, 2 which might be attributable to the widespread distribution of angiotensin converting enzyme 2—the functional receptor for SARS-CoV-2—in multiple organs.3, 4 Patients with cancer are more susceptible to infection than individuals without cancer because of their systemic immunosuppressive state caused by the malignancy and anticancer treatments, such as chemotherapy or surgery.5, 6, 7, 8 Therefore, these patients might be at increased risk of COVID-19 and have a poorer prognosis. On behalf of the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, we worked together with the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China to establish a prospective cohort to monitor COVID-19 cases throughout China. As of the data cutoff on Jan 31, 2020, we have collected and analysed 2007 cases from 575 hospitals (appendix pp 4–9 for a full list) in 31 provincial administrative regions. All cases were diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 acute respiratory disease and were admitted to hospital. We excluded 417 cases because of insufficient records of previous disease history. 18 (1%; 95% CI 0·61–1·65) of 1590 COVID-19 cases had a history of cancer, which seems to be higher than the incidence of cancer in the overall Chinese population (285·83 [0·29%] per 100 000 people, according to 2015 cancer epidemiology statistics 9 ). Detailed information about the 18 patients with cancer with COVID-19 is summarised in the appendix (p 1). Lung cancer was the most frequent type (five [28%] of 18 patients). Four (25%) of 16 patients (two of the 18 patients had unknown treatment status) with cancer with COVID-19 had received chemotherapy or surgery within the past month, and the other 12 (25%) patients were cancer survivors in routine follow-up after primary resection. Compared with patients without cancer, patients with cancer were older (mean age 63·1 years [SD 12·1] vs 48·7 years [16·2]), more likely to have a history of smoking (four [22%] of 18 patients vs 107 [7%] of 1572 patients), had more polypnea (eight [47%] of 17 patients vs 323 [23%] of 1377 patients; some data were missing on polypnea), and more severe baseline CT manifestation (17 [94%] of 18 patients vs 1113 [71%] of 1572 patients), but had no significant differences in sex, other baseline symptoms, other comorbidities, or baseline severity of x-ray (appendix p 2). Most importantly, patients with cancer were observed to have a higher risk of severe events (a composite endpoint defined as the percentage of patients being admitted to the intensive care unit requiring invasive ventilation, or death) compared with patients without cancer (seven [39%] of 18 patients vs 124 [8%] of 1572 patients; Fisher's exact p=0·0003). We observed similar results when the severe events were defined both by the above objective events and physician evaluation (nine [50%] of 18 patients vs 245 [16%] of 1572 patients; Fisher's exact p=0·0008). Moreover, patients who underwent chemotherapy or surgery in the past month had a numerically higher risk (three [75%] of four patients) of clinically severe events than did those not receiving chemotherapy or surgery (six [43%] of 14 patients; figure ). These odds were further confirmed by logistic regression (odds ratio [OR] 5·34, 95% CI 1·80–16·18; p=0·0026) after adjusting for other risk factors, including age, smoking history, and other comorbidities. Cancer history represented the highest risk for severe events (appendix p 3). Among patients with cancer, older age was the only risk factor for severe events (OR 1·43, 95% CI 0·97–2·12; p=0·072). Patients with lung cancer did not have a higher probability of severe events compared with patients with other cancer types (one [20%] of five patients with lung cancer vs eight [62%] of 13 patients with other types of cancer; p=0·294). Additionally, we used a Cox regression model to evaluate the time-dependent hazards of developing severe events, and found that patients with cancer deteriorated more rapidly than those without cancer (median time to severe events 13 days [IQR 6–15] vs 43 days [20–not reached]; p<0·0001; hazard ratio 3·56, 95% CI 1·65–7·69, after adjusting for age; figure). Figure Severe events in patients without cancer, cancer survivors, and patients with cancer (A) and risks of developing severe events for patients with cancer and patients without cancer (B) ICU=intensive care unit. In this study, we analysed the risk for severe COVID-19 in patients with cancer for the first time, to our knowledge; only by nationwide analysis can we follow up patients with rare but important comorbidities, such as cancer. We found that patients with cancer might have a higher risk of COVID-19 than individuals without cancer. Additionally, we showed that patients with cancer had poorer outcomes from COVID-19, providing a timely reminder to physicians that more intensive attention should be paid to patients with cancer, in case of rapid deterioration. Therefore, we propose three major strategies for patients with cancer in this COVID-19 crisis, and in future attacks of severe infectious diseases. First, an intentional postponing of adjuvant chemotherapy or elective surgery for stable cancer should be considered in endemic areas. Second, stronger personal protection provisions should be made for patients with cancer or cancer survivors. Third, more intensive surveillance or treatment should be considered when patients with cancer are infected with SARS-CoV-2, especially in older patients or those with other comorbidities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patients with Cancer Appear More Vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2: A Multicenter Study during the COVID-19 Outbreak

            In a study of 105 patients with cancer and 536 without, all with confirmed COVID-19, cancer was predictive of more severe disease, with stage IV cancer, hematologic cancer, and lung cancer being associated with worse outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Associations between immune-suppressive and stimulating drugs and novel COVID-19—a systematic review of current evidence

              Background Cancer and transplant patients with COVID-19 have a higher risk of developing severe and even fatal respiratory diseases, especially as they may be treated with immune-suppressive or immune-stimulating drugs. This review focuses on the effects of these drugs on host immunity against COVID-19. Methods Using Ovid MEDLINE, we reviewed current evidence for immune-suppressing or -stimulating drugs: cytotoxic chemotherapy, low-dose steroids, tumour necrosis factorα (TNFα) blockers, interlukin-6 (IL-6) blockade, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, IL-1 blockade, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, anti-CD20 and CTLA4-Ig. Results 89 studies were included. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has been shown to be a specific inhibitor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in in vitro studies, but no specific studies exist as of yet for COVID-19. No conclusive evidence for or against the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of COVID-19 patients is available, nor is there evidence indicating that TNFα blockade is harmful to patients in the context of COVID-19. COVID-19 has been observed to induce a pro-inflammatory cytokine generation and secretion of cytokines, such as IL-6, but there is no evidence of the beneficial impact of IL-6 inhibitors on the modulation of COVID-19. Although there are potential targets in the JAK-STAT pathway that can be manipulated in treatment for coronaviruses and it is evident that IL-1 is elevated in patients with a coronavirus, there is currently no evidence for a role of these drugs in treatment of COVID-19. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has led to challenging decision-making about treatment of critically unwell patients. Low-dose prednisolone and tacrolimus may have beneficial impacts on COVID-19. The mycophenolate mofetil picture is less clear, with conflicting data from pre-clinical studies. There is no definitive evidence that specific cytotoxic drugs, low-dose methotrexate for auto-immune disease, NSAIDs, JAK kinase inhibitors or anti-TNFα agents are contraindicated. There is clear evidence that IL-6 peak levels are associated with severity of pulmonary complications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Melanoma Manag
                Melanoma Manag
                MMT
                Melanoma Management
                Future Medicine Ltd (London, UK )
                2045-0885
                2045-0893
                31 July 2020
                September 2020
                31 July 2020
                : 7
                : 3
                : MMT45
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Vanderbilt University Department, School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
                [2 ]Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Author for correspondence: Tel.: +1 615 322 8131; Douglas.b.johnson@ 123456vumc.org
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0979-1625
                Article
                10.2217/mmt-2020-0012
                7475796
                32922727
                2014aa06-4fce-4350-8ee8-8fe45ecd8359
                © 2020 Douglas B. Johnson

                This work is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Unported License

                History
                : 27 May 2020
                : 12 June 2020
                : 31 July 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 3
                Categories
                Editorial

                covid-19,immune checkpoint inhibitors,melanoma,safety
                covid-19, immune checkpoint inhibitors, melanoma, safety

                Comments

                Comment on this article