20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Encoding order and developmental dyslexia: A family of skills predicting different orthographic components

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We investigated order encoding in developmental dyslexia using a task that presented nonalphanumeric visual characters either simultaneously or sequentially—to tap spatial and temporal order encoding, respectively—and asked participants to reproduce their order. Dyslexic participants performed poorly in the sequential condition, but normally in the simultaneous condition, except for positions most susceptible to interference. These results are novel in demonstrating a selective difficulty with temporal order encoding in a dyslexic group. We also tested the associations between our order reconstruction tasks and: (a) lexical learning and phonological tasks; and (b) different reading and spelling tasks. Correlations were extensive when the whole group of participants was considered together. When dyslexics and controls were considered separately, different patterns of association emerged between orthographic tasks on the one side and tasks tapping order encoding, phonological processing, and written learning on the other. These results indicate that different skills support different aspects of orthographic processing and are impaired to different degrees in individuals with dyslexia. Therefore, developmental dyslexia is not caused by a single impairment, but by a family of deficits loosely related to difficulties with order. Understanding the contribution of these different deficits will be crucial to deepen our understanding of this disorder.

          Related collections

          Most cited references84

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Developmental dyslexia: the visual attention span deficit hypothesis.

          The visual attention (VA) span is defined as the amount of distinct visual elements which can be processed in parallel in a multi-element array. Both recent empirical data and theoretical accounts suggest that a VA span deficit might contribute to developmental dyslexia, independently of a phonological disorder. In this study, this hypothesis was assessed in two large samples of French and British dyslexic children whose performance was compared to that of chronological-age matched control children. Results of the French study show that the VA span capacities account for a substantial amount of unique variance in reading, as do phonological skills. The British study replicates this finding and further reveals that the contribution of the VA span to reading performance remains even after controlling IQ, verbal fluency, vocabulary and single letter identification skills, in addition to phoneme awareness. In both studies, most dyslexic children exhibit a selective phonological or VA span disorder. Overall, these findings support a multi-factorial view of developmental dyslexia. In many cases, developmental reading disorders do not seem to be due to phonological disorders. We propose that a VA span deficit is a likely alternative underlying cognitive deficit in dyslexia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dyslexia: a deficit in visuo-spatial attention, not in phonological processing.

            Developmental dyslexia affects up to 10 per cent of the population and it is important to understand its causes. It is widely assumed that phonological deficits, that is, deficits in how words are sounded out, cause the reading difficulties in dyslexia. However, there is emerging evidence that phonological problems and the reading impairment both arise from poor visual (i.e., orthographic) coding. We argue that attentional mechanisms controlled by the dorsal visual stream help in serial scanning of letters and any deficits in this process will cause a cascade of effects, including impairments in visual processing of graphemes, their translation into phonemes and the development of phonemic awareness. This view of dyslexia localizes the core deficit within the visual system and paves the way for new strategies for early diagnosis and treatment. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud.

              At least 3 different types of computational model have been shown to account for various facets of both normal and impaired single word reading: (a) the connectionist triangle model, (b) the dual-route cascaded model, and (c) the connectionist dual process model. Major strengths and weaknesses of these models are identified. In the spirit of nested incremental modeling, a new connectionist dual process model (the CDP+ model) is presented. This model builds on the strengths of 2 of the previous models while eliminating their weaknesses. Contrary to the dual-route cascaded model, CDP+ is able to learn and produce graded consistency effects. Contrary to the triangle and the connectionist dual process models, CDP+ accounts for serial effects and has more accurate nonword reading performance. CDP+ also beats all previous models by an order of magnitude when predicting individual item-level variance on large databases. Thus, the authors show that building on existing theories by combining the best features of previous models--a nested modeling strategy that is commonly used in other areas of science but often neglected in psychology--results in better and more powerful computational models. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)
                Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)
                PQJE
                pqje20
                Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
                Routledge
                1747-0218
                1747-0226
                2 January 2015
                23 September 2014
                : 68
                : 1
                : 99-128
                Affiliations
                [ a ]School of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University , Birmingham, UK
                [ b ]School of Psychology, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to Cristina Romani, School of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University , Aston Triangle, B4 7ET Birmingham, UK. E-mail: c.romani@ 123456aston.ac.uk
                Article
                938666
                10.1080/17470218.2014.938666
                4409052
                25246235
                201f7b41-d643-441a-871e-4dcfc768d199
                © 2014 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 March 2013
                : 6 June 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 96, Pages: 30
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust 10.13039/100004440
                Award ID: N055629
                Categories
                Regular Articles

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                developmental dyslexia,serial order,sequential presentation,visual impairments,lexical learning

                Comments

                Comment on this article