65
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil added to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Subarachnoid block is widely used for cesarean section due to the rapid induction, the complete analgesia, the low failure rate and the prevention of aspiration pneumonia. The addition of intrathecal opioids to local anesthetics seems to improve the quality of analgesia & prolong the duration of analgesia. Therefore we compared the effects of fentanyl 20 µg and sufentanil 2.5 µg, which were added to intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine.

          Methods

          Seventy two healthy term parturients were randomly divided into three groups: Group C (control), Group F (fentanyl 20 µg) and Group S (sufentanil 2.5 µg). In every group, 0.5% heavy bupivacaine was added according to the adjusted dose regimen by Harten et al. We observed the maximal level of the sensory block and motor block, the quality of intraoperative analgesia, the duration of effective analgesia and the side effects.

          Results

          There were significant differences between the control and the fentanyl 20 µg and sufentanil 2.5 µg groups for the degree of muscle relaxation, the quality of intraoperative analgesia, the maximal sedation level and the duration of effective analgesia. The frequencies of side effects such as nausea and pruritis in the opioid groups were higher than those in the control group. But there were no differences between fentanyl 20 µg and sufentanil 2.5 µg for the frequencies of nausea and pruritis.

          Conclusions

          The addition of fentanyl 20 µg or sufentanil 2.5 µg for spinal anesthesia provides adequate intraoperative analgesia without significant adverse effects on the mother and neonate.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comparative spinal distribution and clearance kinetics of intrathecally administered morphine, fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil.

          Despite widespread use, little is known about the comparative pharmacokinetics of intrathecally administered opioids. The present study was designed to characterize the rate and extent of opioid distribution within cerebrospinal fluid, spinal cord, epidural space, and systemic circulation after intrathecal injection. Equal doses of morphine and alfentanil, fentanyl, or sufentanil were administered intrathecally (L3) to anesthetized pigs. Microdialysis probes were used to sample cerebrospinal fluid at L2, T11, T7, T3, and the epidural space at L2 every 5-10 min for 4 h. At the end of the experiment, spinal cord and epidural fat tissue were sampled, and each probe's recovery was determined in vitro. Using SAAM II pharmacokinetic modeling software (SAAM Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA), the data were fit to a 16-compartment model that was divided into four spinal levels, each of which consisted of a caternary arrangement of four compartments representing the spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid, epidural space, and epidural fat. Model simulations revealed that the integral exposure (area under the curve divided by dose) of the spinal cord (i.e., effect compartment) to the opioids was highest for morphine because of its low spinal cord distribution volume and slow clearance into plasma The integral exposure of the spinal cord to the other opioids was relatively low, but for different reasons: alfentanil has a high clearance from spinal cord into plasma, fentanyl distributes rapidly into the epidural space and fat, and sufentanil has a high spinal cord volume of distribution. The four opioids studied demonstrate markedly different pharmacokinetic behavior, which correlates well with their pharmacodynamic behavior.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Multiple opiate receptor sites on primary afferent fibres.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intrathecal sufentanil, fentanyl, or placebo added to bupivacaine for cesarean section.

              We compared the effects of intrathecal sufentanil 2.5 and 5 microg, fentanyl 10 microg, and placebo when administered together with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 12.5 mg for cesarean section. The study was performed in a randomized, double-blind fashion in 80 (20 per group) healthy, full-term parturients presenting for elective cesarean section. Postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). Duration of complete analgesia was defined as the time from the intrathecal injection to VAS score > 0. Duration of effective analgesia was defined as the time to VAS score > or = 4. No patient experienced intraoperative pain. Complete analgesia was prolonged in all groups receiving opioids. Effective analgesia was prolonged and the 0- to 6-h intravenous opioid requirements were lower in the groups receiving sufentanil compared with those receiving fentanyl and placebo. The need for intraoperative antiemetic medication was greater in the placebo group. Pruritus was a frequent and dose-related side effect in the groups receiving sufentanil. There were no differences in umbilical cord blood gases or neonatal Apgar scores and neurological and adaptive capacity scores among the groups. In conclusion, the addition of sufentanil or fentanyl improved the quality of subarachnoid block compared with placebo. The duration of action was longer for sufentanil than fentanyl. Small doses of fentanyl or sufentanil (synthetic opioids) added to bupivacaine (local anesthetic) for spinal anesthesia for cesarean section reduce the need for intraoperative antiemetic medication and increase the duration of analgesia in the early postoperative period compared with placebo.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Anesthesiol
                KJAE
                Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
                The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
                2005-6419
                2005-7563
                February 2011
                25 February 2011
                : 60
                : 2
                : 103-108
                Affiliations
                Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, CHA University School of Medicine, Pocheon, Korea.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Kum Hee Chung, M.D., Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Yatap-dong, Bundang-gu, Sungnam 463-712, Korea. Tel: 82-31-780-1837, Fax: 82-31-780-5566, anesthkh@ 123456cha.ac.kr
                Article
                10.4097/kjae.2011.60.2.103
                3049877
                21390165
                2022f998-fc78-4f2c-b271-30ce7be7515e
                Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2011

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 01 June 2010
                : 05 August 2010
                : 12 September 2010
                Categories
                Clinical Research Article

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                cesarean section,spinal anesthesia,bupivacaines,fentanyl,sufentanil

                Comments

                Comment on this article