14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Response to the Letter: Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Patients Suffering from Liver Injury

      letter
      a , * , b
      Digestive Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)
      S. Karger AG

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor, We thank Dr. Vyas for the interest in our work and the editorial team of Digestive Diseases for the opportunity to respond to the comments in the above-mentioned letter [1]. Our study focused on the temporal pattern of liver injury and SARS-CoV-2 detection in the respiratory tract and patient outcome in conjunction with the degree of liver injury [2]. Thus, we were somewhat surprised with the following statement: “…observation of the present study that the fate of COVID-19 (is) majorly dependent of comorbidity and age of patients.” Our study did not focus on these issues (age and comorbidities were evaluated as potential confounding factors) and is thus not the best source to draw such conclusions. An important critique point was: “The severity due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in majority of cases is directly proportional to blood oxygen saturation levels (SpO2).” The cited article, however, does not support this claim as it comments on a different issue, namely, the target oxygen saturation in COVID-19 therapy [3]. Lung injury is relevant to COVID-19 outcome and this aspect was not highlighted in our study. This limitation should be addressed in future studies. It should be noted that the degree of lung injury in our cohort varied greatly ranging from patients without any need for oxygen treatment to patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; SpO2 alone would not be a reliable marker for lung injury. Another critique point was the classification of patients, which was performed based on ALT and bilirubin and not age. Since our study focused on liver injury, we find it appropriate to form patient groups according to it. The study was also criticized for not including non-SARS-CoV-2 acute liver failure (ALF) patients as a control group and not discussing the outcome of ALF patients due to other common etiologies such as viral hepatitis. Data on ALF mortality have been previously published, including data from our hospital, which put the ALF mortality (irrespective of liver transplantation) at 18% in general [4] and at about 10% for cases with autoimmune hepatitis or hepatitis B infection in particular [5, 6]. Our study focused on SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. In contrast with diseases such as hepatitis B, where the primary target of the disease is the liver, liver injury in SARS-CoV-2 is only a (secondary) aspect of the disease. Thus, we do not think that a comparison between SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and the afore-mentioned groups is meaningful. Conflict of Interest Statement O.E.A. has received a research grant from Hexal, unrelated to the submitted work. C.M.L. has received speaker fees from Abb­Vie, Gilead, MSD, and Norgine and travel support from AbbVie and Gilead, all unrelated to the submitted work.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Considerations for target oxygen saturation in COVID-19 patients: are we under-shooting?

          Background The current target oxygen saturation range for patients with COVID-19 recommended by the National Institutes of Health is 92–96%. Main body This article critically examines the evidence guiding current target oxygen saturation recommendation for COVID-19 patients, and raises important concerns in the extrapolation of data from the two studies stated to be guiding the recommendation. Next, it examines the influence of hypoxia on upregulation of ACE2 (target receptor for SARS-CoV-2 entry) expression, with supporting transcriptomic analysis of a publicly available gene expression profile dataset of human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells cultured in normoxic or hypoxic conditions. Finally, it discusses potential implications of specific clinical observations and considerations in COVID-19 patients on target oxygen saturation, such as diffuse systemic endothelitis and microthrombi playing an important pathogenic role in the wide range of systemic manifestations, exacerbation of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the setting of pulmonary vascular endothelitis/microthrombi, the phenomenon of “silent hypoxemia” with some patients presenting to the hospital with severe hypoxemia disproportional to symptoms, and overburdened health systems and public health resources in many parts of the world with adverse implications on outpatient monitoring and early institution of oxygen supplementation. Conclusions The above factors and analyses, put together, call for an urgent exploration and re-evaluation of target oxygen saturation in COVID-19 patients, both in the inpatient and outpatient settings. Until data from such trials become available, where possible, it may be prudent to target an oxygen saturation at least at the upper end of the recommended 92–96% range in COVID-19 patients both in the inpatient and outpatient settings (in patients that are normoxemic at pre-COVID baseline). Home pulse oximetry, tele-monitoring, and earlier institution of oxygen supplementation for hypoxemic COVID-19 outpatients could be beneficial, where public health resources allow for their implementation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Low transferrin and high ferritin concentrations are associated with worse outcome in acute liver failure.

            Serum ferritin and transferrin have been identified as prognostic markers in patients with chronic diseases. In this study, we investigated if these parameters can predict outcome in patients with acute liver failure.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Corticosteroid Therapy Improves the Outcome of Autoimmune Hepatitis-Induced Acute Liver Failure

              Background/Aims: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a relatively rare cause of liver dysfunction and may lead in some cases to acute liver failure (ALF). The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical course and outcome of patients with AIH-induced ALF. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 32 patients with AIH-induced ALF and 93 age- and sex-matched patients with chronic AIH (cAIH) who were enrolled at the University Clinic Essen from 1988 to 2014. All ALF patients were treated with corticosteroids after diagnosis. Results: Overweight, higher γ-globulin levels, the absence of anti-smooth muscle antibodies and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) B8 and the presence of anti-mitochondrial antibodies and HLA DR7 were risk factors for an ALF vs chronic hepatitis manifestation of AIH. Liver histology was significantly more often typical for AIH in an ALF setting than in cAIH. The spontaneous survival rate was 91% and 97% in ALF and cAIH patients, respectively, at 6 months after diagnosis and only 1 patient in the ALF group developed sepsis under therapy. Conclusion: Liver biopsy in an AIH-mediated ALF setting was both safe and effective in diagnosing AIH. Corticosteroid therapy was not associated with high mortality or sepsis. Our findings suggest that corticosteroid treatment of AIH-mediated ALF may improve the outcome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Dig Dis
                Dig Dis
                DDI
                Digestive Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)
                S. Karger AG (Allschwilerstrasse 10, P.O. Box · Postfach · Case postale, CH–4009, Basel, Switzerland · Schweiz · Suisse, Phone: +41 61 306 11 11, Fax: +41 61 306 12 34, karger@karger.com )
                0257-2753
                1421-9875
                9 October 2020
                : 39
                : 1
                : 1-2
                Affiliations
                [1] aInstitute for Virology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
                [2] bDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
                Author notes
                *Olympia E. Anastasiou, Institute for Virology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, DE–45147 Essen (Germany), olympia.anastasiou@ 123456uni-due.de
                Article
                ddi-0039-0001
                10.1159/000512151
                7801960
                33040069
                203a26ac-9a25-47ea-b376-88ea81adff31
                Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

                History
                : 1 October 2020
                : 8 October 2020
                : 2021
                Page count
                References: 6, Pages: 2
                Categories
                Liver: Reply

                Comments

                Comment on this article