15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Grazing Allometry: Anatomy, Movement, and Foraging Behavior of Three Cattle Breeds of Different Productivity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Modern breeding has formed a multitude of cattle breeds ranging from undemanding, low-productive breeds to high-productive, specialized dairy, or beef cattle. The choice of breed has important implications for farm management, but its impact on pasture vegetation is underestimated. We hypothesized (i) that anatomy, movement, and foraging behavior of cattle are allometrically related on the individual level, (ii) that differences among cattle are not explained by individual variation alone but also by breed, and (iii) that anatomy, movement, and foraging behavior of a cattle breed is related to its productivity. In order to test these hypotheses, we conducted a controlled grazing experiment in which three cattle breeds simultaneously grazed three types of heterogenous, alpine pastures: low-productive Highland cattle (average weight: 358 kg); local, dual-purpose Original Braunvieh (582 kg); and high-productive Angus × Holstein crossbreed (679 kg). We measured body weight and claw base of nine cows per breed after 10 weeks of grazing alpine pastures. Over a period of 9 days, we recorded the step frequency and lying time by pedometer and space use by GPS. Moreover, we visually observed foraging behavior on three occasions per cow. Forage selectivity and quality were calculated for every cow's diet. Allometric relationships were analyzed on the individual level by fitting standardized major axes. For most parameters measured, we detected strong allometric relationships and clear differences among breeds that depended on the level of productivity. The claws of Highland cattle were relatively large compared to their body weight and thus they exerted less static pressure than other breeds. Moreover, the more productive a breed was, the higher its selectivity and step frequency were. For example, Highland cattle foraged shrubs and thistles more frequently than high-productive Angus × Holstein. The latter walked longer distances to select higher-quality forage, while Highland cattle used the space more evenly, visited steeper slopes, and moved further away from water points. Irrespective of breed, vegetation composition influenced cattle behavior: On pastures of low forage quality, animals walked more, foraged more selectively, and used space less evenly. In conclusion, the observed breed-specific differences can be used to improve pasture management and grassland conservation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Ungulate Effects on the Functional Species Composition of Plant Communities: Herbivore Selectivity and Plant Tolerance

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of grazing on grassland soil carbon: a global review.

              Soils of grasslands represent a large potential reservoir for storing CO2 , but this potential likely depends on how grasslands are managed for large mammal grazing. Previous studies found both strong positive and negative grazing effects on soil organic carbon (SOC) but explanations for this variation are poorly developed. Expanding on previous reviews, we performed a multifactorial meta-analysis of grazer effects on SOC density on 47 independent experimental contrasts from 17 studies. We explicitly tested hypotheses that grazer effects would shift from negative to positive with decreasing precipitation, increasing fineness of soil texture, transition from dominant grass species with C3 to C4 photosynthesis, and decreasing grazing intensity, after controlling for study duration and sampling depth. The six variables of soil texture, precipitation, grass type, grazing intensity, study duration, and sampling depth explained 85% of a large variation (±150 g m(-2)  yr(-1) ) in grazing effects, and the best model included significant interactions between precipitation and soil texture (P = 0.002), grass type, and grazing intensity (P = 0.012), and study duration and soil sampling depth (P = 0.020). Specifically, an increase in mean annual precipitation of 600 mm resulted in a 24% decrease in grazer effect size on finer textured soils, while on sandy soils the same increase in precipitation produced a 22% increase in grazer effect on SOC. Increasing grazing intensity increased SOC by 6-7% on C4 -dominated and C4 -C3 mixed grasslands, but decreased SOC by an average 18% in C3 -dominated grasslands. We discovered these patterns despite a lack of studies in natural, wildlife-dominated ecosystems, and tropical grasslands. Our results, which suggest a future focus on why C3 vs. C4 -dominated grasslands differ so strongly in their response of SOC to grazing, show that grazer effects on SOC are highly context-specific and imply that grazers in different regions might be managed differently to help mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Vet Sci
                Front Vet Sci
                Front. Vet. Sci.
                Frontiers in Veterinary Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-1769
                14 August 2020
                2020
                : 7
                : 494
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Forage Production and Grassland Systems, Agroscope , Zurich, Switzerland
                [2] 2Department of Crop Sciences, Georg-August-University , Göttingen, Germany
                [3] 3Centre for Organismal Studies, Ruprecht-Karls-University , Heidelberg, Germany
                [4] 4AgroVet-Strickhof , Lindau, Switzerland
                [5] 5Animal Production Systems and Animal Health, Agroscope , Zurich, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Mauro Coppa, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), France

                Reviewed by: Maurizio Ramanzin, University of Padova, Italy; Manja Zupan Šemrov, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

                *Correspondence: Manuel K. Schneider manuel.schneider@ 123456agroscope.admin.ch

                This article was submitted to Animal Behavior and Welfare, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science

                Article
                10.3389/fvets.2020.00494
                7457131
                32923468
                206d05c1-418c-45bf-88bc-3675d56e4a49
                Copyright © 2020 Pauler, Isselstein, Berard, Braunbeck and Schneider.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 31 March 2020
                : 30 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 74, Pages: 17, Words: 11941
                Funding
                Funded by: Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes 10.13039/501100004350
                Categories
                Veterinary Science
                Original Research

                alpine pastures,cattle breeds,claws,forage selection,gps,movement behavior,pedometer,species diversity

                Comments

                Comment on this article