Blog
About

14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adverse drug reactions caused by drug-drug interactions reported to Croatian Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices: a retrospective observational study

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          To analyze potential and actual drug-drug interactions reported to the Spontaneous Reporting Database of the Croatian Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices (HALMED) and determine their incidence.

          Methods

          In this retrospective observational study performed from March 2005 to December 2008, we detected potential and actual drug-drug interactions using interaction programs and analyzed them.

          Results

          HALMED received 1209 reports involving at least two drugs. There were 468 (38.7%) reports on potential drug-drug interactions, 94 of which (7.8% of total reports) were actual drug-drug interactions. Among actual drug-drug interaction reports, the proportion of serious adverse drug reactions (53 out of 94) and the number of drugs (n = 4) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than among the remaining reports (580 out of 1982; n = 2, respectively). Actual drug-drug interactions most frequently involved nervous system agents (34.0%), and interactions caused by antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were in most cases serious. In only 12 out of 94 reports, actual drug-drug interactions were recognized by the reporter.

          Conclusion

          The study confirmed that the Spontaneous Reporting Database was a valuable resource for detecting actual drug-drug interactions. Also, it identified drugs leading to serious adverse drug reactions and deaths, thus indicating the areas which should be in the focus of health care education.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients.

          To ascertain the current burden of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) through a prospective analysis of all admissions to hospital. Prospective observational study. Two large general hospitals in Merseyside, England. 18 820 patients aged > 16 years admitted over six months and assessed for cause of admission. Prevalence of admissions due to an ADR, length of stay, avoidability, and outcome. There were 1225 admissions related to an ADR, giving a prevalence of 6.5%, with the ADR directly leading to the admission in 80% of cases. The median bed stay was eight days, accounting for 4% of the hospital bed capacity. The projected annual cost of such admissions to the NHS is 466m pounds sterling (706m Euros, 847m dollars). The overall fatality was 0.15%. Most reactions were either definitely or possibly avoidable. Drugs most commonly implicated in causing these admissions included low dose aspirin, diuretics, warfarin, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs other than aspirin, the most common reaction being gastrointestinal bleeding. The burden of ADRs on the NHS is high, accounting for considerable morbidity, mortality, and extra costs. Although many of the implicated drugs have proved benefit, measures need to be put into place to reduce the burden of ADRs and thereby further improve the benefit:harm ratio of the drugs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group.

              To assess incidence and preventability of adverse drug events (ADEs) and potential ADEs. To analyze preventable events to develop prevention strategies. Prospective cohort study. All 4031 adult admissions to a stratified random sample of 11 medical and surgical units in two tertiary care hospitals over a 6-month period. Units included two medical and three surgical intensive care units and four medical and two surgical general care units. Adverse drug events and potential ADEs. Incidents were detected by stimulated self-report by nurses and pharmacists and by daily review of all charts by nurse investigators. Incidents were subsequently classified by two independent reviewers as to whether they represented ADEs or potential ADEs and as to severity and preventability. Over 6 months, 247 ADEs and 194 potential ADEs were identified. Extrapolated event rates were 6.5 ADEs and 5.5 potential ADEs per 100 nonobstetrical admissions, for mean numbers per hospital per year of approximately 1900 ADEs and 1600 potential ADEs. Of all ADEs, 1% were fatal (none preventable), 12% life-threatening, 30% serious, and 57% significant. Twenty-eight percent were judged preventable. Of the life-threatening and serious ADEs, 42% were preventable, compared with 18% of significant ADEs. Errors resulting in preventable ADEs occurred most often at the stages of ordering (56%) and administration (34%); transcription (6%) and dispensing errors (4%) were less common. Errors were much more likely to be intercepted if the error occurred earlier in the process: 48% at the ordering stage vs 0% at the administration stage. Adverse drug events were common and often preventable; serious ADEs were more likely to be preventable. Most resulted from errors at the ordering stage, but many also occurred at the administration stage. Prevention strategies should target both stages of the drug delivery process.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Affiliations
                [1]Pharmacovigilance Department, Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices, Zagreb, Croatia
                [2]Centre for Applied Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
                [3]Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, University School of Medicine and University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia
                [4]Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices, Zagreb, Croatia
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: 
Nikica Mirošević Skvrce
Pharmacovigilance Department
Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices (HALMED)
Ksaverska cesta 4
HR 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
nikica.mirosevic@123456halmed.hr
                Journal
                Croat Med J
                CMJ
                Croatian Medical Journal
                Croatian Medical Schools
                0353-9504
                1332-8166
                October 2011
                : 52
                : 5
                : 604-614
                3195969
                21990078
                CroatMedJ_52_0604
                10.3325/cmj.2011.52.604
                Copyright © 2011 by the Croatian Medical Journal. All rights reserved.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                Categories
                Clinical Science

                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article