19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ultrasound-guided carotid sheath block for carotid endarterectomy: a case series of the spread of injectate

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          We aimed to show the spread of local anesthetic following an ultrasound-guided, double-injection technique of a carotid sheath block before carotid endarterectomy.

          Methods

          The study included 15 patients scheduled for elective carotid endarterectomy. The carotid sheath block was performed after ultrasound-guided localization of the carotid bifurcation (level C4-C6) at the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. A mix of 7.5 mL ropivacaine 0.75%, 7.5 mL prilocaine1% and 3 mL iopromidum was injected at the base of the carotid bifurcation. An additional 15 mL of the mixture was administered subcutaneously at the surgical incision line. Thirty minutes after the block, a computed tomography scan of the head, neck region and upper thorax was performed to reconstruct a 3-D distribution of the injectate.

          Results

          All patients achieved C2-C4 dermatomal sensory blockade. None required conversion to general anesthesia. The injectate spread ranged from the vertebral body of C1 to the vertebral body of T3. The mean volume of distribution was 97±13 mL, the craniocaudal spread 138±19 mm, dorsoventral 57±8 mm and coronal 53±8 mm. The mean carotid artery circumference contact was 252°±77, with four patients (27%) presenting with a ring formation (360°) around the carotid artery.

          Conclusions

          Ultrasound-guided carotid sheath block provided an extensive spread of local anesthetic. A complete ring formation of local anesthetic around the artery does not seem necessary for a successful anesthesia. The resulting nerve blockade thus appears sufficient for surgery, with minor risks compared to blind methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

          Despite the growing interest in the use of ultrasound (US) imaging to guide performance of regional anaesthetic procedures such as peripheral nerve blocks, controversy still exists as to whether US is superior to previously developed nerve localization techniques such as the use of a peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS). We sought to clarify this issue by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials that have compared these two methods of nerve localization. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar databases and also the reference lists of relevant publications for eligible studies. A total of 13 studies met our criteria and were included for analysis. Studies were rated for methodological quality by two reviewers. Data from these studies were abstracted and synthesized using a meta-analysis. Blocks performed using US guidance were more likely to be successful [risk ratio (RR) for block failure 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.66, P<0.001], took less time to perform (mean 1 min less to perform with US, 95% CI 0.4-1.7 min, P=0.003), had faster onset (29% shorter onset time, 95% CI 45-12%, P=0.001), and had longer duration (mean difference 25% longer, 95% CI 12-38%, P<0.001) than those performed with PNS guidance. US guidance also decreased the risk of vascular puncture during block performance (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.47, P=0.001). US improves efficacy of peripheral nerve block compared with techniques that utilize PNS for nerve localization. Larger studies are needed to determine whether or not the use of US can decrease the number of complications such as nerve injury or systemic local anaesthetic toxicity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

            The effect of carotid endarterectomy in lowering the risk of stroke ipsilateral to severe atherosclerotic carotid-artery stenosis is offset by complications during or soon after surgery. We compared surgery under general anaesthesia with that under local anaesthesia because prediction and avoidance of perioperative strokes might be easier under local anaesthesia than under general anaesthesia. We undertook a parallel group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial of 3526 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis from 95 centres in 24 countries. Participants were randomly assigned to surgery under general (n=1753) or local (n=1773) anaesthesia between June, 1999 and October, 2007. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with stroke (including retinal infarction), myocardial infarction, or death between randomisation and 30 days after surgery. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with Current Control Trials number ISRCTN00525237. A primary outcome occurred in 84 (4.8%) patients assigned to surgery under general anaesthesia and 80 (4.5%) of those assigned to surgery under local anaesthesia; three events per 1000 treated were prevented with local anaesthesia (95% CI -11 to 17; risk ratio [RR] 0.94 [95% CI 0.70 to 1.27]). The two groups did not significantly differ for quality of life, length of hospital stay, or the primary outcome in the prespecified subgroups of age, contralateral carotid occlusion, and baseline surgical risk. We have not shown a definite difference in outcomes between general and local anaesthesia for carotid surgery. The anaesthetist and surgeon, in consultation with the patient, should decide which anaesthetic technique to use on an individual basis. The Health Foundation (UK) and European Society of Vascular Surgery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Superficial or deep cervical plexus block for carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review of complications.

              Carotid endarterectomy is commonly conducted under regional (deep, superficial, intermediate, or combined) cervical plexus block, but it is not known if complication rates differ. We conducted a systematic review of published papers to assess the complication rate associated with superficial (or intermediate) and deep (or combined deep plus superficial/intermediate). The null hypothesis was that complication rates were equal. Complications of interest were: (1) serious complications related to the placement of block, (2) incidence of conversion to general anaesthesia, and (3) serious systemic complications of the surgical-anaesthetic process. We retrieved 69 papers describing a total of 7558 deep/combined blocks and 2533 superficial/intermediate blocks. Deep/combined block was associated with a higher serious complication rate related to the injecting needle when compared with the superficial/intermediate block (odds ratio 2.13, P = 0.006). The conversion rate to general anaesthesia was also higher with deep/combined block (odds ratio 5.15, P < 0.0001), but there was an equivalent incidence of other systemic serious complications (odds ratio 1.13, P = 0.273; NS). We conclude that superficial/intermediate block is safer than any method that employs a deep injection. The higher rate of conversion to general anaesthesia with the deep/combined block may have been influenced by the higher incidence of direct complications, but may also suggest that the superficial/combined block provides better analgesia during surgery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Heart Lung Vessel
                Heart Lung Vessel
                2282-8419
                hlv
                Heart, Lung and Vessels
                EDIMES Edizioni Internazionali Srl
                2282-8419
                2283-3420
                2015
                : 7
                : 2
                : 168-176
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
                [2 ]Department of Radiology, Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
                [3 ]Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
                Author notes
                Mattias Casutt, MD. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Kantonsspital Lucerne Spitalstrasse CH-6000 Lucerne 16 Switzerland; E-mail: mattias.casutt@ 123456luks.ch
                Article
                201502168
                4476771
                20d447b8-00f5-40ff-8df0-5ee6e39dcc98
                Copyright © 2015, Heart, Lung and Vessels

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Research-Article

                carotid endarterectomy,cervical plexus block,carotid sheath block,spread of local anesthetic,three-dimensional reconstruction,ultrasonic controlled

                Comments

                Comment on this article