46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      STL-based Analysis of TRAIL-induced Apoptosis Challenges the Notion of Type I/Type II Cell Line Classification

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Extrinsic apoptosis is a programmed cell death triggered by external ligands, such as the TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL). Depending on the cell line, the specific molecular mechanisms leading to cell death may significantly differ. Precise characterization of these differences is crucial for understanding and exploiting extrinsic apoptosis. Cells show distinct behaviors on several aspects of apoptosis, including (i) the relative order of caspases activation, (ii) the necessity of mitochondria outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) for effector caspase activation, and (iii) the survival of cell lines overexpressing Bcl2. These differences are attributed to the activation of one of two pathways, leading to classification of cell lines into two groups: type I and type II. In this work we challenge this type I/type II cell line classification. We encode the three aforementioned distinguishing behaviors in a formal language, called signal temporal logic (STL), and use it to extensively test the validity of a previously-proposed model of TRAIL-induced apoptosis with respect to experimental observations made on different cell lines. After having solved a few inconsistencies using STL-guided parameter search, we show that these three criteria do not define consistent cell line classifications in type I or type II, and suggest mutants that are predicted to exhibit ambivalent behaviors. In particular, this finding sheds light on the role of a feedback loop between caspases, and reconciliates two apparently-conflicting views regarding the importance of either upstream or downstream processes for cell-type determination. More generally, our work suggests that these three distinguishing behaviors should be merely considered as type I/II features rather than cell-type defining criteria. On the methodological side, this work illustrates the biological relevance of STL-diagrams, STL population data, and STL-guided parameter search implemented in the tool Breach. Such tools are well-adapted to the ever-increasing availability of heterogeneous knowledge on complex signal transduction pathways.

          Author Summary

          Apoptosis, a major form of programmed cell death, plays a crucial role in shaping organs during development and controls homeostasis and tissue integrity throughout life. Defective apoptosis is often involved in cancer development and progression. Current understanding of externally triggered apoptosis is that death results from the activation of one out of two parallel signal transduction pathways. This leads to a classification of cell lines in two main types: type I and II. In the context of chemotherapy, understanding the cell-line-specific molecular mechanisms of apoptosis is important since this could guide drug usage. Biologists investigate the details of signal transduction pathways often at the single cell level and construct models to assess their current understanding. However, no systematic approach is employed to check the consistency of model predictions and experimental observations on various cell lines. Here we propose to use a formal specification language to encode the observed properties and a systematic approach to test whether model predictions are consistent with expected properties. Such property-guided model development and model revision approaches should guarantee an optimal use of the often heterogeneous experimental data.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Two CD95 (APO-1/Fas) signaling pathways.

          We have identified two cell types, each using almost exclusively one of two different CD95 (APO-1/Fas) signaling pathways. In type I cells, caspase-8 was activated within seconds and caspase-3 within 30 min of receptor engagement, whereas in type II cells cleavage of both caspases was delayed for approximately 60 min. However, both type I and type II cells showed similar kinetics of CD95-mediated apoptosis and loss of mitochondrial transmembrane potential (DeltaPsim). Upon CD95 triggering, all mitochondrial apoptogenic activities were blocked by Bcl-2 or Bcl-xL overexpression in both cell types. However, in type II but not type I cells, overexpression of Bcl-2 or Bcl-xL blocked caspase-8 and caspase-3 activation as well as apoptosis. In type I cells, induction of apoptosis was accompanied by activation of large amounts of caspase-8 by the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), whereas in type II cells DISC formation was strongly reduced and activation of caspase-8 and caspase-3 occurred following the loss of DeltaPsim. Overexpression of caspase-3 in the caspase-3-negative cell line MCF7-Fas, normally resistant to CD95-mediated apoptosis by overexpression of Bcl-xL, converted these cells into true type I cells in which apoptosis was no longer inhibited by Bcl-xL. In summary, in the presence of caspase-3 the amount of active caspase-8 generated at the DISC determines whether a mitochondria-independent apoptosis pathway is used (type I cells) or not (type II cells).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The CD95(APO-1/Fas) DISC and beyond.

            CD95 (APO-1/Fas) is a prototype death receptor characterized by the presence of an 80 amino acid death domain in its cytoplasmic tail. This domain is essential for the recruitment of a number of signaling components upon activation by either agonistic anti-CD95 antibodies or cognate CD95 ligand that initiate apoptosis. The complex of proteins that forms upon triggering of CD95 is called the death-inducting signaling complex (DISC). The DISC consists of an adaptor protein and initiator caspases and is essential for induction of apoptosis. A number of proteins have been reported to regulate formation or activity of the DISC. This review discusses recent developments in this area of death receptor research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quantitative analysis of pathways controlling extrinsic apoptosis in single cells.

              Apoptosis in response to TRAIL or TNF requires the activation of initiator caspases, which then activate the effector caspases that dismantle cells and cause death. However, little is known about the dynamics and regulatory logic linking initiators and effectors. Using a combination of live-cell reporters, flow cytometry, and immunoblotting, we find that initiator caspases are active during the long and variable delay that precedes mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) and effector caspase activation. When combined with a mathematical model of core apoptosis pathways, experimental perturbation of regulatory links between initiator and effector caspases reveals that XIAP and proteasome-dependent degradation of effector caspases are important in restraining activity during the pre-MOMP delay. We identify conditions in which restraint is impaired, creating a physiologically indeterminate state of partial cell death with the potential to generate genomic instability. Together, these findings provide a quantitative picture of caspase regulatory networks and their failure modes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Comput Biol
                PLoS Comput. Biol
                plos
                ploscomp
                PLoS Computational Biology
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1553-734X
                1553-7358
                May 2013
                May 2013
                9 May 2013
                : 9
                : 5
                : e1003056
                Affiliations
                [1 ]INRIA Paris-Rocquencourt, Le Chesnay, France
                [2 ]VERIMAG, CNRS and the University of Grenoble, Gières, France
                Princeton University, United States of America
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: SS AD FB GB. Performed the experiments: SS AD GB. Analyzed the data: SS AD FB OM GB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SS AD. Wrote the paper: SS GB.

                [¤]

                Current address: EECS Department, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.

                Article
                PCOMPBIOL-D-12-01828
                10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003056
                3649977
                23675292
                20fcdcc5-b2d3-4f01-ac0a-95a99dda891d
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 16 November 2012
                : 26 March 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Funding
                This work was supported by the research grant Syne2arti ANR-10-COSINUS-007 from the French National Research Agency. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Computational Biology
                Biochemical Simulations
                Signaling Networks
                Systems Biology

                Quantitative & Systems biology
                Quantitative & Systems biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article