16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of user-driven intervention to prevent aggressive events in psychiatric services

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          People admitted to psychiatric hospitals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia may display behavioural problems. These may require management approaches such as use of coercive practices, which impact the well-being of staff members, visiting families and friends, peers, as well as patients themselves. Studies have proposed that not only patients’ conditions, but also treatment environment and ward culture may affect patients’ behaviour. Seclusion and restraint could possibly be prevented with staff education about user-centred, more humane approaches. Staff education could also increase collaboration between patients, family members and staff, which may further positively affect treatment culture and lower the need for using coercive treatment methods.

          Methods

          This is a single-blind, two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial involving 28 psychiatric hospital wards across Finland. Units will be randomised to receive either a staff educational programme delivered by the team of researchers, or standard care. The primary outcome is the incidence of use of patient seclusion rooms, assessed from the local/national health registers. Secondary outcomes include use of other coercive methods (limb restraint, forced injection, and physical restraint), service use, treatment satisfaction, general functioning among patients, and team climate and employee turn-over (nursing staff).

          Discussion

          The study, designed in close collaboration with staff members, patients and their relatives, will provide evidence for a co-operative and user-centred educational intervention aiming to decrease the prevalence of coercive methods and service use in the units, increase the functional status of patients and improve team climate in the units. We have identified no similar trials.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02724748. Registered on 25 th of April 2016.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure.

          The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) is a self-report measure designed to enable investigators to easily obtain sensitive measures of the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced by subjects in various areas of daily functioning. The summary scores were found to be reliable and valid measures of these dimensions in a group of depressed outpatients. The Q-LES-Q measures were related to, but not redundant with, measures of overall severity of illness or severity of depression within this sample. These findings suggest that the Q-LES-Q measures may be sensitive to important differences among depressed patients that are not detected by the measures usually employed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The intricate link between violence and mental disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

            The relationship between mental illness and violence has a significant effect on mental health policy, clinical practice, and public opinion about the dangerousness of people with psychiatric disorders. To use a longitudinal data set representative of the US population to clarify whether or how severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression lead to violent behavior. Data on mental disorder and violence were collected as part of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), a 2-wave face-to-face survey conducted by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. A total of 34 653 subjects completed NESARC waves 1 (2001-2003) and 2 (2004-2005) interviews. Wave 1 data on severe mental illness and risk factors were analyzed to predict wave 2 data on violent behavior. Reported violent acts committed between waves 1 and 2. Bivariate analyses showed that the incidence of violence was higher for people with severe mental illness, but only significantly so for those with co-occurring substance abuse and/or dependence. Multivariate analyses revealed that severe mental illness alone did not predict future violence; it was associated instead with historical (past violence, juvenile detention, physical abuse, parental arrest record), clinical (substance abuse, perceived threats), dispositional (age, sex, income), and contextual (recent divorce, unemployment, victimization) factors. Most of these factors were endorsed more often by subjects with severe mental illness. Because severe mental illness did not independently predict future violent behavior, these findings challenge perceptions that mental illness is a leading cause of violence in the general population. Still, people with mental illness did report violence more often, largely because they showed other factors associated with violence. Consequently, understanding the link between violent acts and mental disorder requires consideration of its association with other variables such as substance abuse, environmental stressors, and history of violence.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project: an epidemiological basis for informing mental health policies in Europe.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +35823338495 , mava@utu.fi
                yangmin2013@scu.edu.cn
                sharon@hcp.med.harvard.edu
                lorig@stanford.edu
                minant@utu.fi
                tejela@utu.fi
                vimapek@utu.fi
                clive.adams@nottingham.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-244X
                4 April 2017
                4 April 2017
                2017
                : 17
                : 123
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1374.1, Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, , University of Turku , ; Turku, Finland
                [2 ]GRID grid.16890.36, School of Nursing, , Hong Kong Polytechnic University, ; Hong Kong, China
                [3 ]GRID grid.410552.7, , Turku University Hospital, ; Turku, Finland
                [4 ]GRID grid.13291.38, West China Research Center for Rural Health Development, Sichuan University Huaxi Medical Center, , Sichuan University of China, ; Administration Building, No 17,Section 3,Ren Ming Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan China
                [5 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, Department of Health Care Policy, , Harvard Medical School, ; 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115-5899 USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, , Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard Medical School, ; 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115-5899 USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.168010.e, Department of Medicine - Med/Immunology & Rheumatology, , Stanford University, ; 1000 WELCH RD. #204, Stanford, CA 94305-5755 USA
                [8 ]GRID grid.4563.4, , Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, ; Wollaton Road, Nottingham, NG8 1BB UK
                Article
                1266
                10.1186/s12888-017-1266-6
                5379524
                28372555
                212480b0-73eb-4a57-be9e-8e04f19c0230
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 20 February 2017
                : 11 March 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002341, Suomen Akatemia;
                Award ID: 294298
                Award ID: 307367
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Hospital District of Southwest Finland
                Award ID: 13893
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                user-driven intervention,patient-centred,psychiatry,aggression,treatment culture,cluster randomised,controlled trial,effectiveness

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content116

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors1,232