5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intermittent antegrade warm-blood versus cold-blood cardioplegia in children undergoing open heart surgery: a protocol for a randomised controlled study (Thermic-3)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Surgical repair of congenital heart defects often requires the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardioplegic arrest. Cardioplegia is used during cardiac surgery requiring CPB to keep the heart still and to reduce myocardial damage as a result of ischaemia–reperfusion injury. Cold cardioplegia is the prevalent method of myocardial protection in paediatric patients; however, warm cardioplegia is used as part of usual care throughout the UK in adults. We aim to provide evidence to support the use of warm versus cold blood cardioplegia on clinical and biochemical outcomes during and after paediatric congenital heart surgery.

          Methods and analysis

          We are conducting a single-centre randomised controlled trial in paediatric patients undergoing operations requiring CPB and cardioplegic arrest at the Bristol Royal Hospital for Children. We will randomise participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ‘cold-blood cardioplegia’ or ‘warm-blood cardioplegia’. The primary outcome will be the difference between groups with respect to Troponin T levels over the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes will include measures of cardiac function; renal function; cerebral function; arrythmias during and postoperative hours; postoperative blood loss in the first 12 hours; vasoactive-inotrope score in the first 48 hours; intubation time; chest and wound infections; time from return from theatre until fit for discharge; length of postoperative hospital stay; all-cause mortality to 3 months postoperative; myocardial injury at the molecular and cellular level.

          Ethics and dissemination

          This trial has been approved by the London – Central Research Ethics Committee. Findings will be disseminated to the academic community through peer-reviewed publications and presentation at national and international meetings. Patients will be informed of the results through patient organisations and newsletters to participants.

          Trial registration number

          ISRCTN13467772; Pre-results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Vasoactive-inotropic score as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in infants after cardiopulmonary bypass.

          Inotrope score has been proposed as a marker of illness severity after pediatric cardiac surgery despite a lack of data to support its use as such. The goal of this study was to determine the association between inotropic/vasoactive support and clinical outcome in infants after cardiac surgery. Retrospective chart review. Dedicated pediatric cardiothoracic intensive care unit at an academic, tertiary care medical center. One hundred seventy-four patients 0 to 6 months of age admitted to the cardiothoracic intensive care unit after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between August 2007 and June 2008. Forty-three percent were neonates, and 39% had functional single ventricle physiology. None. Hourly doses of all vasoactive medications were recorded for the first 48 hrs after admission to the cardiothoracic intensive care unit and a vasoactive-inotropic score was calculated. The maximum vasoactive-inotropic score level over the first 48 hrs was a good predictor of poor clinical outcome (death, cardiac arrest, mechanical circulatory support, renal replacement therapy, and/or neurologic injury). After controlling for diagnosis, high maximum vasoactive-inotropic score was strongly associated with a poor outcome with an adjusted odds ratio of 8.1 (95% confidence interval, 3.4-19.2; p < .001) compared with patients with a low maximum vasoactive-inotropic score. High vasoactive-inotropic score was also associated with prolonged cardiothoracic intensive care unit stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and time to negative fluid balance. The amount of cardiovascular support in the first 48 hrs after congenital heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass predicts eventual morbidity and mortality in young infants. The degree of support is best characterized by a maximum vasoactive-inotropic score obtained during this period. The usefulness of vasoactive-inotropic score as an independent predictor of clinical outcome in infants after cardiac surgery may have important implications for future cardiothoracic intensive care unit research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cardiac and neurological assessment of normothermia/warm blood cardioplegia vs hypothermia/cold crystalloid cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery: insight from a prospective randomized trial.

            Although normothermia and warm blood cardioplegia are widely used in adults, cold crystalloids and hypothermia remain routinely used in pediatric cardiac surgery. The superiority of either technique in both brain and myocardial protection remains controversial. We designed a prospective randomized study to compare both approaches in terms of early myocardial protection and late neurodevelopmental status.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Developing and evaluating multimedia information resources to improve engagement of children, adolescents, and their parents with trials (TRECA study): Study protocol for a series of linked randomised controlled trials

              Background Randomised controlled trials are widely established as the best method for testing health interventions whilst minimising bias. However, recruitment and subsequent retention of children and adolescents in healthcare trials is challenging. Participant information sheets are often lengthy and difficult to read and understand. Presenting key information using multimedia may help to overcome these limitations and better support young people and their parents in deciding whether to participate in a clinical trial. Methods The TRECA (TRials Engagement in Children and Adolescents) study has two phases. The first phase involves a qualitative study with children and adolescents and their parents to inform the development of multimedia information resources and iterative user testing to refine the resources. The second phase will embed the use of the multimedia information resources into six host trials in the United Kingdom. Patients and parents approached to participate in the host trials will be randomly allocated to either use the multimedia information resource in conjunction with standard participant information sheets, the multimedia information resource alone, or the standard participant information sheets alone. The primary outcome will be the effect of the multimedia information resources on recruitment into trials. Other outcomes measured include the effect of multimedia information resources on retention of participants into the host trials and the impact on family members’ decision-making processes, when compared to standard participant information sheets alone. Discussion This study will inform whether multimedia information resources, when developed using participatory design principles, are able to increase recruitment and retention of children and adolescents into trials. There is also the potential for patients to make better informed decisions through the use of multimedia information resources. The multimedia information resources also have the potential to assist with providing information on other healthcare decisions outside of clinical trials. Trial registration ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN73136092 (doi:10.1186/ISRCTN73136092). Registered on 24 August 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1962-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2020
                14 October 2020
                : 10
                : 10
                : e036974
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentBristol Trials Centre, Clincal Trials and Evaulation Unit , Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol , Bristol, UK
                [2 ]departmentNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre , University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol , Bristol, UK
                [3 ]departmentBristol Royal Hospital for Children , University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust , Bristol, UK
                [4 ]departmentBristol Heart Institue , University of Bristol , Bristol, UK
                [5 ]departmentCardiac Intensive Care , Great Ormond Street Hospital For Children NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Rachael Heys; rh13369@ 123456bristol.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3957-1287
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5101-9487
                Article
                bmjopen-2020-036974
                10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036974
                7559029
                33055113
                214308ab-a20e-4ddc-9e11-d48daeb510e0
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 15 January 2020
                : 05 May 2020
                : 23 July 2020
                Categories
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                1506
                1683
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                congenital heart disease,cardiac surgery,clinical trials,paediatric cardiothoracic surgery,protocols & guidelines

                Comments

                Comment on this article