5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cancer resection rates, socioeconomic deprivation, and geographical access to surgery among urban, suburban, and rural populations across Canada

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          High-risk cancer resection surgeries are increasingly being performed at fewer, more specialised, and higher-volume institutions across Canada. The resulting increase in travel time for patients to obtain treatment may be exacerbated by socioeconomic barriers to access. Focussing on five high-risk surgery types (oesophageal, ovarian/fallopian, liver, lung, and pancreatic cancers), this study examines socioeconomic trends in age-adjusted resection rates and travel time to surgery location for urban, suburban, and rural populations across Canada, excluding Québec, from 2004 to 2012. Significant differences in age-adjusted resection rates were observed between urban (14.9 per 100 000 person-years [95% CI: 12.2, 17.6]), suburban (40.7 [40.1, 41.2]), and rural (32.7 [29.6, 35.9]) populations, with higher rates in suburban and rural areas throughout the study period for all cancer types. Resection rates did not differ between the highest (Q1) and lowest (Q5) socioeconomic strata (Q1: 13.3 [12.2, 14.4]; Q5: 12.0 [10.7, 13.4]), with significantly higher rates among middle-SES patients (Q2: 27.3 [25.6, 29.0]; Q3: 39.6 [37.4, 41.8]; Q4: 37.5 [35.3, 39.7]). Travel times to treatment were consistently higher among the most socioeconomically deprived patients, most notably in suburban and rural areas. The results suggest that the conventional inclusion of suburbs with urban areas in health research may obfuscate important trends for public health policy and programmes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges

            Primary care is recognized as the most important form of healthcare for maintaining population health because it is relatively inexpensive, can be more easily delivered than specialty and inpatient care, and if properly distributed it is most effective in preventing disease progression on a large scale. Recent advances in the field of health geography have greatly improved our understanding of the role played by geographic distribution of health services in population health maintenance. However, most of this knowledge has accrued for hospital and specialty services and services in rural areas. Much less is known about the effect of distance to and supply of primary care on primary care utilization, particularly in the U.S. For several reasons the shortage of information is particularly acute for urban areas, where the majority of people live. First, explicit definitions and conceptualizations of healthcare access have not been widely used to guide research. An additional barrier to progress has been an overwhelming concern about affordability of care, which has garnered the majority of attention and research resources. Also, the most popular measures of spatial accessibility to care – travel impedance to nearest provider and supply level within bordered areas – lose validity in congested urban areas. Better measures are needed. Fortunately, some advances are occurring on the methodological front. These can improve our knowledge of all types of healthcare geography in all settings, including primary care in urban areas. This paper explains basic concepts and measurements of access, provides some historical background, outlines the major questions concerning geographic accessibility of primary care, describes recent developments in GIS and spatial analysis, and presents examples of promising work.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature.

              To systematically review the methodologic rigor of the research on volume and outcomes and to summarize the magnitude and significance of the association between them. The authors searched MEDLINE from January 1980 to December 2000 for English-language, population-based studies examining the independent relationship between hospital or physician volume and clinical outcomes. Bibliographies were reviewed to identify other articles of interest, and experts were contacted about missing or unpublished studies. Of 272 studies reviewed, 135 met inclusion criteria and covered 27 procedures and clinical conditions. Two investigators independently reviewed each article, using a standard form to abstract information on key study characteristics and results. The methodologic rigor of the primary studies varied. Few studies used clinical data for risk adjustment or examined effects of hospital and physician volume simultaneously. Overall, 71% of all studies of hospital volume and 69% of studies of physician volume reported statistically significant associations between higher volume and better outcomes. The strongest associations were found for AIDS treatment and for surgery on pancreatic cancer, esophageal cancer, abdominal aortic aneurysms, and pediatric cardiac problems (a median of 3.3 to 13 excess deaths per 100 cases were attributed to low volume). Although statistically significant, the volume-outcome relationship for coronary artery bypass surgery, coronary angioplasty, carotid endarterectomy, other cancer surgery, and orthopedic procedures was of much smaller magnitude. Hospital volume-outcome studies that performed risk adjustment by using clinical data were less likely to report significant associations than were studies that adjusted for risk by using administrative data. High volume is associated with better outcomes across a wide range of procedures and conditions, but the magnitude of the association varies greatly. The clinical and policy significance of these findings is complicated by the methodologic shortcomings of many studies. Differences in case mix and processes of care between high- and low-volume providers may explain part of the observed relationship between volume and outcome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                14 October 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 10
                : e0240444
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institut für Geographie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
                [2 ] Dept. of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
                [3 ] University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [4 ] Division of Thoracic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
                Massachusetts General Hospital, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1983-3147
                Article
                PONE-D-20-02842
                10.1371/journal.pone.0240444
                7556448
                33052963
                214fcd5e-9e6f-4fa7-af71-02cd492ff094
                © 2020 Walker et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 31 January 2020
                : 25 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Pages: 13
                Funding
                Funded by: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung;
                Award Recipient : Blake Walker
                This study was funded by Health Canada through the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. The lead author is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Treatment
                Surgical Oncology
                Tumor Resection
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Clinical Medicine
                Clinical Oncology
                Surgical Oncology
                Tumor Resection
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Clinical Oncology
                Surgical Oncology
                Tumor Resection
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
                Surgical Resection
                Tumor Resection
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Lung and Intrathoracic Tumors
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Treatment
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Treatment
                Surgical Oncology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Clinical Medicine
                Clinical Oncology
                Surgical Oncology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Clinical Oncology
                Surgical Oncology
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Human Geography
                Social Geography
                Neighborhoods
                Social Sciences
                Human Geography
                Social Geography
                Neighborhoods
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Socioeconomic Aspects of Health
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Socioeconomic Aspects of Health
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
                Surgical Resection
                Custom metadata
                The data comprise patients’ residential locations and the locations at which they received a resection procedure, and therefore are highly sensitive and may not be shared. Data requests for the purposes of replication or analysis may be submitted to the Canadian Cancer Registry ( https://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/about/pia/ccr or STATCAN.infostats-infostats.STATCAN@ 123456canada.ca ).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article