Left ventricular hypertrophy and function in high, normal, and low-renin forms of essential hypertension.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

To assess the relative importance of the level of blood pressure (BP) and renin profile status as determinants of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and dysfunction, we studied, by quantitative echocardiography, 118 hypertensive patients off medication. The 19 high-renin patients were younger (31 +/- 13 years; p less than 0.01) but had hypertension of severity (152 +/- 13/95 +/- 11 mg Hg) similar to the 79 normal-renin patients (42 +/- 14 years; 152 +/- 17/98 +/- 12 mg Hg) and 20 low-renin patients (49 +/- 13 yrs; 157 +/- 17/95 +/- 11 mm Hg). Left ventricular (LV) mass index (normal = 70 +/- 25 g/m2) was similar in the high- (113 +/- 21 g/m2, p less than 0.001), normal = (114 +/- 31 g/m2, p less than 0.001), and low-renin patients (115 +/- 18 g/m2, p less than 0.01). End-diastolic relative wall thickness (nl = 0.32 +/- 0.05) was equally elevated in high- (0.41 +/- 0.09), normal (0.42 +/- 0.08) and low-renin groups (0.41 +/- 0.08) (all p less than 0.001). In the entire population, there was a closer correlation of relative wall thickness with total peripheral resistance (r = 0.54, p less than 0.001) than with mean blood pressure (r = 0.31, p less than 0.05). LV dysfunction (LV fractional systolic shortening less than 26%) occurred only in two high-renin patients, whereas LV fractional shortening was significantly increased in the low-renin subgroup (p less than 0.01). We conclude that the degree of LVH is similar in low-, normal-, and high-renin hypertensives and is proportional to the degree of hypertension, even though the high-renin patients were significantly younger; but that the low-renin patients with similar level of blood pressure, even though significantly older and with a longer duration of hypertension than the other patient groups, manifest increased LV function compared to normals.

Related collections

Most cited references 48

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method.

R Devereux, N Reichek (1977)

An accurte echocardiographic (E) method for determination of left ventricular mass (LVM) was derived from systematic analysis of the relationship between the antemortem left ventricular echogram and postmortem anatomic LVM in 34 adults with a wide range of anatomic LVM (101-505 g). No subject had massive myocardial infarction, ventricular aneurysm, severe right ventricular volume overload or hypertrophic cardiography. The best method for LVM-E identified combined cube function geometry with a modified convention for determination of left ventricular internal dimension (LVID), posterior wall thickness (PWT), and interventricular septal thickness (IVST), which excluded the thickness of endocardial echo lines from wall thicknesses and included the thickness of left septal and posterior wall endocardial echo lines in LVID (Penn Convention, P). By this method, anatomic LVM = 1.04 ([LVIDp + PWTp + IVSTp]3--[LVIDp]3) -- 14 g; r = 0.96, SD= 29 g, N= 34. Standard echo measurements gave less accurate results, as did previously reported methods for LVM-E. LVM-Dp is an accurate, widely applicable method for the study of left ventricular hypertrophy.

0 comments Cited 128 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements.

D J Sahn, A. DeMaria, J Kisslo … (1978)

Four hundred M-mode echocardiographic surveys were distributed to determine interobserver variability in M-mode echocardiographic measurements. This was done with a view toward examining the need and determining the criteria for standardization of measurement. Each survey consisted of five M-mode echocardiograms with a calibration marker, measured by the survey participants anonymously. The echoes were judged of adequate quality for measurement of structures. Seventy-six of the 400 (19%) were returned, allowing comparison of interobserver variability as well as examination of the measurement criteria which were used. Mean measurements and percent uncertainty were derived for each structure for each criterion of measurement. For example, for the aorta, 33% of examiners measured the aorta as an outer/inner or leading edge dimension, and 20% measured it as an outer/outer dimension. The percent uncertainty for the measurement (1.97 SD divided by the mean) showed a mean of 13.8% for the 25 packets of five echoes measured using the former criteria and 24.2% using the latter criteria. For ventricular chamber and cavity measurements, almost one-half of the examiners used the peak of the QRS and one-half of the examiners used the onset of the QRS for determining end-diastole. Estimates of the percent of measurement uncertainty for the septum, posterior wall and left ventricular cavity dimension in this study were 10--25%. They were much higher (40--70%) for the right ventricular cavity and right ventricular anterior wall. The survey shows significant interobserver and interlaboratory variation in measurement when examining the same echoes and indicates a need for ongoing education, quality control and standardization of measurement criteria. Recommendations for new criteria for measurement of M-mode echocardiograms are offered.