7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Youth engagement in research: exploring training needs of youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Authentic researcher-youth partnerships in patient-oriented research (POR) where the research responds to the needs expressed by youth themselves are essential to make research meaningful. While patient-oriented research (POR) is increasingly practiced, few training programs exist in Canada and none, to our knowledge, are tailored for youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDD). Our primary objective was to explore the training needs of youth (ages 18–25) with NDD to enhance their knowledge, confidence, and skills as research partners. Our secondary objective was to identify the benefits and challenges of engaging youth with NDD in a POR approach.

          Methods

          Our team of four youth and one parent with lived experience [Youth Engagement in Research (YER) partners] and six researchers engaged in POR to investigate the primary objective via two phases: (1) individual interviews with youth living with NDD and (2) a two-day virtual symposium with focus groups with youth and researchers. Collaborative qualitative content analysis was employed to synthesize the data. Our secondary objective was assessed by asking our YER partners to complete the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) survey and participate in reflective discussions.

          Results

          Phase 1 participants (n = 7) identified various barriers and facilitators to their engagement in research and offered suggestions to meet their needs through minimizing barriers and integrating facilitators, which would subsequently enhance their knowledge, confidence, and skills as research partners. Informed by phase 1, phase 2 participants (n = 17) prioritized the following POR training needs: researcher-youth communication, research roles and responsibilities, and finding partnership opportunities. For delivery methods, participants stated the importance of youth representation, using Universal Design for Learning, and co-learning between youth and researchers. Based on the PPEET data and subsequent discussions, YER partners agreed that they were able to express views freely, feel that their views were heard, and that their participation made a meaningful difference. Challenges included scheduling difficulties, ensuring multiple methods for engagement, and working under short timelines.

          Conclusion

          This study identified important training needs for youth with NDD and for researchers to engage in meaningful POR, which can subsequently inform the co-production of accessible training opportunities with and for youth.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-023-00452-3.

          Abstract

          Partnerships between researchers and youth, known as patient-oriented research (POR), are needed to make sure research is meaningful to youth. Our main goal was to explore the training needs of youth (ages 18-25) with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDD) to enhance their knowledge, confidence, and skills as research partners. To find out, our team of four youth and one parent with lived experience (YER partners) and six researchers completed this project in two parts: 1) interviews with youth and 2) a two-day virtual workshop with youth and researchers. Data from the two parts were reviewed to answer our question. We learned from Part 1 that the needs of participants can be met by providing support and reducing barriers in POR. From Part 2, the top three important topics in partnerships were: researcher-youth communication, research roles and responsibilities, and finding partnership opportunities. Participants in the workshop emphasized having different youth represented, using a framework that allows learning for everyone, and co-learning between youth and researchers in the creation of learning materials. Our second goal was to understand the benefits and challenges of our partnership. To assess, YER partners completed a survey and reflected about their experiences. YER partners agreed on being able to express views, feel that their views were heard, and that their participation made a meaningful difference. Challenges included scheduling difficulties, providing multiple ways to partner, and working under short timelines. Overall, the study described important POR needs for youth and researchers, which can inform future training opportunities.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-023-00452-3.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

          Content analysis is a widely used qualitative research technique. Rather than being a single method, current applications of content analysis show three distinct approaches: conventional, directed, or summative. All three approaches are used to interpret meaning from the content of text data and, hence, adhere to the naturalistic paradigm. The major differences among the approaches are coding schemes, origins of codes, and threats to trustworthiness. In conventional content analysis, coding categories are derived directly from the text data. With a directed approach, analysis starts with a theory or relevant research findings as guidance for initial codes. A summative content analysis involves counting and comparisons, usually of keywords or content, followed by the interpretation of the underlying context. The authors delineate analytic procedures specific to each approach and techniques addressing trustworthiness with hypothetical examples drawn from the area of end-of-life care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Naturalistic inquiry

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Whatever happened to qualitative description?

              The general view of descriptive research as a lower level form of inquiry has influenced some researchers conducting qualitative research to claim methods they are really not using and not to claim the method they are using: namely, qualitative description. Qualitative descriptive studies have as their goal a comprehensive summary of events in the everyday terms of those events. Researchers conducting qualitative descriptive studies stay close to their data and to the surface of words and events. Qualitative descriptive designs typically are an eclectic but reasonable combination of sampling, and data collection, analysis, and re-presentation techniques. Qualitative descriptive study is the method of choice when straight descriptions of phenomena are desired. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons,
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nguyel7@mcmaster.ca
                j.w.gorter-4@umcutrecht.nl
                Journal
                Res Involv Engagem
                Res Involv Engagem
                Research Involvement and Engagement
                BioMed Central (London )
                2056-7529
                10 July 2023
                10 July 2023
                2023
                : 9
                : 50
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.25073.33, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8227, Bachelor of Health Sciences Program, , McMaster University, ; Hamilton, ON Canada
                [2 ]GRID grid.25073.33, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8227, CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, , McMaster University, ; Hamilton, ON Canada
                [3 ]GRID grid.25073.33, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8227, School of Rehabilitation Science, , McMaster University, ; Hamilton, ON Canada
                [4 ]GRID grid.25073.33, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8227, Department of Pediatrics, , McMaster University, ; Hamilton, ON Canada
                [5 ]Youth Engagement in Research (YER) Partners/Patient Authors, Hamilton, Canada
                [6 ]GRID grid.25073.33, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8227, Childhood Cerebral Palsy Integrated Neuroscience Discovery Network (CP-NET), , McMaster University, ; Hamilton, ON Canada
                [7 ]GRID grid.28046.38, ISNI 0000 0001 2182 2255, Biomedical Science Program, , Ottawa University, ; Ottawa, ON Canada
                [8 ]GRID grid.7692.a, ISNI 0000000090126352, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, , University Medical Center Utrecht, ; Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Article
                452
                10.1186/s40900-023-00452-3
                10332095
                37430378
                217f4b2d-7a6e-4f9e-8b21-2b7996849572
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 21 October 2022
                : 26 May 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004489, Mitacs;
                Award ID: IT21708
                Award ID: IT21708
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000024, Canadian Institutes of Health Research;
                Award ID: TLS 170679
                Award ID: TLS 170668
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: The CHILD-BRIGHT Network, Training and Innovation Fund
                Funded by: Scotiabank Chair in Child Health Research
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                youth,engagement,patient-oriented research,disability,training,inclusion

                Comments

                Comment on this article