0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Computational insights into the differentiated binding affinities of Myc, Max, and Omomyc dimers to the E-boxes of DNA

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Amber biomolecular simulation programs.

          We describe the development, current features, and some directions for future development of the Amber package of computer programs. This package evolved from a program that was constructed in the late 1970s to do Assisted Model Building with Energy Refinement, and now contains a group of programs embodying a number of powerful tools of modern computational chemistry, focused on molecular dynamics and free energy calculations of proteins, nucleic acids, and carbohydrates. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

            Molecular mechanics models have been applied extensively to study the dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids. Here we report the development of a third-generation point-charge all-atom force field for proteins. Following the earlier approach of Cornell et al., the charge set was obtained by fitting to the electrostatic potentials of dipeptides calculated using B3LYP/cc-pVTZ//HF/6-31G** quantum mechanical methods. The main-chain torsion parameters were obtained by fitting to the energy profiles of Ace-Ala-Nme and Ace-Gly-Nme di-peptides calculated using MP2/cc-pVTZ//HF/6-31G** quantum mechanical methods. All other parameters were taken from the existing AMBER data base. The major departure from previous force fields is that all quantum mechanical calculations were done in the condensed phase with continuum solvent models and an effective dielectric constant of epsilon = 4. We anticipate that this force field parameter set will address certain critical short comings of previous force fields in condensed-phase simulations of proteins. Initial tests on peptides demonstrated a high-degree of similarity between the calculated and the statistically measured Ramanchandran maps for both Ace-Gly-Nme and Ace-Ala-Nme di-peptides. Some highlights of our results include (1) well-preserved balance between the extended and helical region distributions, and (2) favorable type-II poly-proline helical region in agreement with recent experiments. Backward compatibility between the new and Cornell et al. charge sets, as judged by overall agreement between dipole moments, allows a smooth transition to the new force field in the area of ligand-binding calculations. Test simulations on a large set of proteins are also discussed. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 24: 1999-2012, 2003
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Approximate atomic surfaces from linear combinations of pairwise overlaps (LCPO)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of Molecular Modeling
                J Mol Model
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1610-2940
                0948-5023
                October 2022
                September 23 2022
                October 2022
                : 28
                : 10
                Article
                10.1007/s00894-022-05261-1
                36149511
                2180303f-690f-48d8-9688-0b4047f7a8ee
                © 2022

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article