28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Neurosurgical management of massive cerebellar infarct outcome in 53 patients

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Massive ischemic cerebellar infarct (MICI) is a main source of stroke, which can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. There is no consensus in medical literature for the management of MICI. The choice is made between placing an external ventricular drainage, suboccipital decompressive craniectomy, and removal of necrotic tissue or conservative treatment. There are not many prospective studies, done on this subject.

          Methods:

          We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features, and imaging studies of 53 patients with MICI who had been treated by surgery or conservative treatment between January 2000 and December 2008 at the Department of Neurosurgery of the general hospital of Fort de France in Martinique. A total of 25 patients underwent surgery and 28 were treated medically.

          Results:

          The results show significantly better outcomes in the operated patients compared with the patients treated medically; Operated comatose patients demonstrated significant improvement in their Glasgow coma score (GCS) score with only two deaths. Whereas, nonoperated comatose patients lost points in their GCS with four deaths.

          Conclusion:

          The results of our study suggest that surgery may be an effective procedure and quite helpful for MICI in majority of cases.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diagnosis and initial management of cerebellar infarction.

          Cerebellar infarction is an important cause of stroke that often presents with common and non-specific symptoms such as dizziness, nausea and vomiting, unsteady gait, and headache. Accurate diagnosis frequently relies on careful attention to patients' coordination, gait, and eye movements--components of the neurological physical examination that are sometimes omitted or abridged if cerebellar stroke is not specifically being considered. The differential diagnosis is broad, and includes many common and benign causes. Furthermore, early-stage posterior fossa ischaemia is rarely seen with brain CT--the most commonly available initial imaging test that is used for stroke. Insufficient examination and imaging can result in misdiagnosis. However, early correct diagnosis is crucial to help prevent treatable but potentially fatal complications, such as brainstem compression and obstructive hydrocephalus. The identification and treatment of the underlying vascular lesions at an early stage can also prevent subsequent occurrences of stroke and improve patients' outcomes. Here, we review the clinical presentation of cerebellar infarction, from diagnosis and misdiagnosis to patients' monitoring, treatment, and potential complications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cerebellar stroke without motor deficit: clinical evidence for motor and non-motor domains within the human cerebellum.

            To determine whether there are non-motor regions of cerebellum in which sizeable infarcts have little or no impact on motor control. We evaluated motor deficits in patients following cerebellar stroke using a modified version of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (MICARS). Lesion location was determined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized axial tomography (CT). Patients were grouped by stroke location-Group I, stroke within the anterior lobe (lobules I-V); Group 2, anterior lobe and lobule VI; Group 3, posterior lobe (lobules VI-IX; including flocculonodular lobe, lobule X); Group 4, posterior lobe but excluding lobule VI (i.e. lobules VII-X); Group 5, stroke within anterior lobe plus posterior lobe. Thirty-nine patients were examined 8.0+/-6.0 days following stroke. There were no Group 1 patients. As mean MICARS scores for Groups 2 through 5 differed significantly (one-way analysis of variance, F(3,35)=10.9, P=0.000 03), post hoc Tukey's least significant difference tests were used to compare individual groups. Group 2 MICARS scores (n=6; mean+/-SD, 20.2+/-6.9) differed from Group 3 (n=6; 7.2+/-3.8; P=0.01) and Group 4 (n=13; 2.5+/-2.0; P=0.000 02); Group 5 (n=14; 18.6+/-12.8) also differed from Group 3 (P=0.009) and Group 4 (P=0.000 02). There were no differences between Groups 2 and 5 (P=0.71), or between Group 3 and Group 4 (P=0.273). However, Group 3 differed from Group 4 when analyzed with a two-sample t-test unadjusted for multiple comparisons (P=0.03). Thus, the cerebellar motor syndrome resulted from stroke in the anterior lobe, but not from stroke in lobules VII-X (Groups 2 plus 5, n=20, MICARS 19.1+/-11.2, vs. Group 4; P=0.000 002). Strokes involving lobule VI produced minimal motor impairment. These findings demonstrate that cerebellar stroke does not always result in motor impairment, and they provide clinical evidence for topographic organization of motor versus nonmotor functions in the human cerebellum.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Surgical and medical management of patients with massive cerebellar infarctions: results of the German-Austrian Cerebellar Infarction Study.

              Surgical intervention (ventricular drainage or decompressive craniotomy) may be necessary in patients with cerebellar infarction if mass effect develops. However, patient selection and timing of surgery remain controversial, and there are few data on clinical signs in the early course that are predictive for outcome. The clinical course and neuroradiological features of 84 patients (aged 22-78, mean 58.5 years) with massive cerebellar infarction confirmed by computed tomography were prospectively observed for 21 days after admission and at 3-month follow-up using a standardized protocol. Data were gathered from 1992 to 1996 in 17 centers. The patients were assigned to three treatment groups depending on the decision of the primary caretaker: 34 underwent craniotomy and evacuation, 14 received ventriculostomy, and 36 were treated medically. Treatment groups differed regarding the level of consciousness, signs of mass effect in computed tomography and signs of brainstem involvement. The overall risk for poor outcome depended on the level of consciousness after clinical deterioration (odds ratio = 2.8). Subgroup analysis of awake/drowsy or somnolent/stupor patients revealed no relationship to treatment. The vascular territory involved did not affect outcome. Surgical treatment for massive cerebellar infarctions was not found to be superior to medical treatment in awake/drowsy or somnolent/stupor patients. Half of all patients deteriorating to coma treated with ventricular drainage or decompressive craniotomy had a meaningful recovery. We were unable to compare surgical versus medical therapy in this subgroup due to lack of control group. This study supports the notion that the level of consciousness is the most powerful predictor of outcome, superior to any other clinical sign and treatment assignment. Deterioration of consciousness typically occurred between days 2 and 4, with a maximum on day 3.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Surg Neurol Int
                Surg Neurol Int
                SNI
                Surgical Neurology International
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                2229-5097
                2152-7806
                2013
                27 February 2013
                : 4
                : 28
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Neurosurgery, General Hospital of Cayenne, French Guiana
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author
                Article
                SNI-4-28
                10.4103/2152-7806.107906
                3604818
                23532804
                219f2c2e-15aa-4845-a083-1a89f28898b2
                Copyright: © 2013 Mostofi K

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 29 November 2012
                : 16 January 2013
                Categories
                Fundamental Neurosurgery

                Surgery
                cerebellar infarct,external ventricular derivation,neurovascular,suboccipital craniotomy

                Comments

                Comment on this article