16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Association of Low-To-Moderate Alcohol Consumption with Breast Cancer Subtypes Defined by Hormone Receptor Status

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Alcohol is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer, but pathways involved in alcohol -related breast carcinogenesis are not clearly defined. We examined the association between low-to-moderate alcohol intake and breast cancer subtypes by tumor hormone receptor status.

          Materials and Methods

          A hospital-based case-control study was performed in 585 cases and 1,170 controls. Information on alcohol intake and other risk factors was collected via a questionnaire. Logistic regression was used for analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided.

          Results

          The odds ratio of breast cancer was 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21–2.53) in women who consumed ≤5 drinks/week, and 3.13 (95% CI: 1.81–5.43) in women who consumed >5 drinks/week, both compared with non-drinkers for ≥10 years, after adjustment for age and other confounders. The association of alcohol intake with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer was stronger than with estrogen receptor-negative: the odds ratio per 1 category increase was 2.05 (95% CI: 1.49–2.82) and 1.29 (95% CI: 0.85–1.94) (P-heterogeneity = 0.07). There was no evidence of an interaction between alcohol intake and menopausal status (P = 0.19) in overall group; however, it was significant in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (P = 0.04).

          Conclusions

          Low-to-moderate alcohol intake is associated with the risk of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer with the strongest association in postmenopausal women. Since alcohol intake is a modifiable risk factor of breast cancer, every woman should be informed and advised to control alcohol use.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies.

          Reproductive and hormonal factors are involved in the etiology of breast cancer, but there are only a few prospective studies on endogenous sex hormone levels and breast cancer risk. We reanalyzed the worldwide data from prospective studies to examine the relationship between the levels of endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. We analyzed the individual data from nine prospective studies on 663 women who developed breast cancer and 1765 women who did not. None of the women was taking exogenous sex hormones when their blood was collected to determine hormone levels. The relative risks (RRs) for breast cancer associated with increasing hormone concentrations were estimated by conditional logistic regression on case-control sets matched within each study. Linear trends and heterogeneity of RRs were assessed by two-sided tests or chi-square tests, as appropriate. The risk for breast cancer increased statistically significantly with increasing concentrations of all sex hormones examined: total estradiol, free estradiol, non-sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG)-bound estradiol (which comprises free and albumin-bound estradiol), estrone, estrone sulfate, androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and testosterone. The RRs for women with increasing quintiles of estradiol concentrations, relative to the lowest quintile, were 1.42 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04 to 1.95), 1.21 (95% CI = 0.89 to 1.66), 1.80 (95% CI = 1.33 to 2.43), and 2.00 (95% CI = 1.47 to 2.71; P(trend)<.001); the RRs for women with increasing quintiles of free estradiol were 1.38 (95% CI = 0.94 to 2.03), 1.84 (95% CI = 1.24 to 2.74), 2.24 (95% CI = 1.53 to 3.27), and 2.58 (95% CI = 1.76 to 3.78; P(trend)<.001). The magnitudes of risk associated with the other estrogens and with the androgens were similar. SHBG was associated with a decrease in breast cancer risk (P(trend) =.041). The increases in risk associated with increased levels of all sex hormones remained after subjects who were diagnosed with breast cancer within 2 years of blood collection were excluded from the analysis. Levels of endogenous sex hormones are strongly associated with breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of alcohol consumption on plasma and urinary hormone concentrations in premenopausal women.

            Most epidemiologic studies of the relationship between alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk over the past decade have shown that persons who consume a moderate amount of alcohol are at 40%-100% greater risk of breast cancer than those who do not consume alcohol. Dose-response effects have been observed, but no causal relationship has been established. This study examines the hypothesis that alcohol consumption affects levels of reproductive hormones. A controlled-diet study lasting for six consecutive menstrual cycles was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups, and a crossover design was used. During the last three menstrual cycles, alcohol consumption of the two groups was reversed. Thirty-four premenopausal women, aged 21-40 years, with a history of regular menstrual cycles, consumed 30 g of ethanol (equivalent to approximately two average drinks) per day for three menstrual cycles and no alcohol for the other three. All food and alcohol consumed were provided by the study. Caloric intake was monitored to ensure that each woman would maintain body weight at approximately the baseline level. Hormone assays were performed on pooled plasma or 24-hour urine specimens collected during the follicular (days 5-7), peri-ovulatory (days 12-15), and mid-luteal (days 21-23) phases of the third menstrual cycle for subjects on each diet. Alcohol consumption was associated with statistically significant increases in levels of several hormones. Plasma dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels were 7.0% higher in the follicular phase (P = .05). In the peri-ovulatory phase, there were increases of 21.2% (P = .01) in plasma estrone levels, 27.5% (P = .01) in plasma estradiol levels, and 31.9% (P = .009) in urinary estradiol levels. In the luteal phase, urinary estrone levels rose 15.2% (P = .05), estradiol levels increased 21.6% (P = .02), and estriol levels rose 29.1% (P = .03). No changes were found in the percent of bioavailable estradiol, defined by the sum of percent free estradiol and percent albumin-bound estradiol. However, increased total estradiol levels in the peri-ovulatory phase suggest elevated absolute amounts of bioavailable estradiol. This study has shown increases in total estrogen levels and amount of bioavailable estrogens in association with alcohol consumption in premenopausal women. This possible explanatory mechanism for a positive association between alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk merits further investigation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Serum hormones and the alcohol-breast cancer association in postmenopausal women.

              Alcohol ingestion is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in most epidemiologic studies. Results, however, are heterogeneous at lower levels of alcohol intake, and a biologic mechanism for the association has not been clearly identified. To determine whether alcohol consumption by postmenopausal women elevates serum levels of hormones associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, we performed a controlled feeding study. Participants were 51 healthy postmenopausal women not using hormone replacement therapy. Each participant rotated through three 8-week dietary periods in which she consumed 15 or 30 g of alcohol per day or an alcohol-free placebo beverage. The order of assignment to the three alcohol levels was random. During the dietary periods, all food and beverages were supplied by the study, and energy intake was adjusted to keep body weight constant. Levels of estradiol, estrone, estrone sulfate, testosterone, androstenedione, progesterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), DHEA sulfate (DHEAS), and androstenediol were measured by radioimmunoassays in serum collected at the end of each dietary period. All statistical tests are two-sided. When women consumed 15 or 30 g of alcohol per day, respectively, estrone sulfate concentrations increased by 7.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.3% to 15.9%; P =.06) and 10.7% (95% CI = 2.7% to 19.3%; P =.009) and DHEAS concentrations increased by 5.1% (95% CI = 1.4% to 9.0%; P =.008) and 7.5% (95% CI = 3.7% to 11.5%; P<.001) relative to levels when women consumed placebo. None of the other hormones measured changed statistically significantly when women consumed alcohol. Results suggest a possible mechanism by which consumption of one or two alcoholic drinks per day by postmenopausal women could increase their risk of breast cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                16 December 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 12
                : e0144680
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Neuroscience Institute, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
                [2 ]MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Department of Pathological Anatomy, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
                [4 ]Department of Surgery, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
                Wayne State University School of Medicine, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: LS. Performed the experiments: LS LP AB DP. Analyzed the data: LS SJS RK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LP AB DP. Wrote the paper: LS SJS. Contributed to interpretation of the data: LS SJS RK LP AB DP. Read and approved the final manuscript: LS SJS RK LP AB DP.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-47323
                10.1371/journal.pone.0144680
                4682633
                26674340
                21c0a25f-9074-41d6-b49c-65d8fa6d2b11
                © 2015 Strumylaite et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 28 October 2015
                : 20 November 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Pages: 12
                Funding
                The work was supported by the following: No. T-64/09; The Lithuanian State Science and Studies Foundation (at present the Research Council of Lithuania). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article