29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Semaglutide Added to Basal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 5): A Randomized, Controlled Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context

          Combination therapy with insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) is important for treating type 2 diabetes (T2D). This trial assesses the efficacy and safety of semaglutide, a GLP-1RA, as an add-on to basal insulin.

          Objective

          To demonstrate the superiority of semaglutide vs placebo on glycemic control as an add-on to basal insulin in patients with T2D.

          Design

          Phase 3a, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 30-week trial.

          Setting

          This study included 90 sites in five countries.

          Patients

          We studied 397 patients with uncontrolled T2D receiving stable therapy with basal insulin with or without metformin.

          Interventions

          Subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 or 1.0 mg once weekly or volume-matched placebo.

          Main Outcome Measures

          Primary endpoint was change in glycated Hb (HbA 1c) from baseline to week 30. Confirmatory secondary endpoint was change in body weight from baseline to week 30.

          Results

          At week 30, mean HbA 1c reductions [mean baseline value, 8.4% (67.9 mmol/mol)] with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg were 1.4% (15.8 mmol/mol) and 1.8% (20.2 mmol/mol) vs 0.1% (1.0 mmol/mol) with placebo [estimated treatment difference (ETD) vs placebo, –1.35 (14.8 mmol/mol); 95% CI, –1.61 to –1.10 and ETD, –1.75% (19.2 mmol/mol); 95% CI, –2.01 to –1.50; both P < 0.0001]. Severe or blood glucose–confirmed hypoglycemic episodes were reported in 11 patients (17 events) and 14 patients (25 events) with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg, respectively, vs seven patients (13 events) with placebo (estimated rate ratio vs placebo, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.67 to 6.51 and estimated rate ratio vs placebo, 2.41; 95% CI, 0.84 to 6.96 for 0.5 and 1.0 mg; both P = nonsignificant). Mean body weight decreased with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg vs placebo from baseline to end of treatment: 3.7, 6.4, and 1.4 kg (ETD, –2.31; 95% CI, –3.33 to –1.29 and ETD, –5.06; 95% CI, –6.08 to –4.04 kg; both P < 0.0001). Premature treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was higher for semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg vs placebo (4.5%, 6.1%, and 0.8%), mainly due to gastrointestinal disorders.

          Conclusions

          Semaglutide, added to basal insulin, significantly reduced HbA 1c and body weight in patients with uncontrolled T2D vs placebo.

          Abstract

          The randomized, double-blind SUSTAIN 5 trial demonstrated the superiority of once-weekly semaglutide vs placebo in patients with uncontrolled T2D on basal insulin therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational Global Attitudes of Patients and Physicians in Insulin Therapy study

          Aims To examine patient and physician beliefs regarding insulin therapy and the degree to which patients adhere to their insulin regimens. Methods Internet survey of 1250 physicians (600 specialists, 650 primary care physicians) who treat patients with diabetes and telephone survey of 1530 insulin-treated patients (180 with Type 1 diabetes, 1350 with Type 2 diabetes) in China, France, Japan, Germany, Spain, Turkey, the UK or the USA. Results One third (33.2%) of patients reported insulin omission/non-adherence at least 1 day in the last month, with an average of 3.3 days. Three quarters (72.5%) of physicians report that their typical patient does not take their insulin as prescribed, with a mean of 4.3 days per month of basal insulin omission/non-adherence and 5.7 days per month of prandial insulin omission/non-adherence. Patients and providers indicated the same five most common reasons for insulin omission/non-adherence: too busy; travelling; skipped meals; stress/emotional problems; public embarrassment. Physicians reported low patient success at initiating insulin in a timely fashion and adjusting insulin doses. Most physicians report that many insulin-treated patients do not have adequate glucose control (87.6%) and that they would treat more aggressively if not for concern about hypoglycaemia (75.5%). Although a majority of patients (and physicians) regard insulin treatment as restrictive, more patients see insulin treatment as having positive than negative impacts on their lives. Conclusions Glucose control is inadequate among insulin-treated patients, in part attributable to insulin omission/non-adherence and lack of dose adjustment. There is a need for insulin regimens that are less restrictive and burdensome with lower risk of hypoglycaemia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.

            Insulin replacement in diabetes often requires prandial intervention to reach hemoglobin A₁(c) (HbA₁(c)) targets. To test whether twice-daily exenatide injections reduce HbA₁(c) levels more than placebo in people receiving insulin glargine. Parallel, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, blocked and stratified by HbA₁(c) level at site, performed from October 2008 to January 2010. Participants, investigators, and personnel conducting the study were masked to treatment assignments. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00765817) 59 centers in 5 countries. Adults with type 2 diabetes and an HbA₁(c) level of 7.1% to 10.5% who were receiving insulin glargine alone or in combination with metformin or pioglitazone (or both agents). Assignment by a centralized, computer-generated, random-sequence interactive voice-response system to exenatide, 10 µg twice daily, or placebo for 30 weeks. The primary outcome was change in HbA₁(c) level. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of participants with HbA₁(c) values of 7.0% or less and 6.5% or less, 7-point self-monitored glucose profiles, body weight, waist circumference, insulin dose, hypoglycemia, and adverse events. 112 of 138 exenatide recipients and 101 of 123 placebo recipients completed the study. The HbA₁(c) level decreased by 1.74% with exenatide and 1.04% with placebo (between-group difference, -0.69% [95% CI, -0.93% to -0.46%]; P < 0.001). Weight decreased by 1.8 kg with exenatide and increased by 1.0 kg with placebo (between-group difference, -2.7 kg [CI, -3.7 to -1.7]). Average increases in insulin dosage with exenatide and placebo were 13 U/d and 20 U/d. The estimated rate of minor hypoglycemia was similar between groups. Thirteen exenatide recipients and 1 placebo recipient discontinued the study because of adverse events (P < 0.010); rates of nausea (41% vs. 8%), diarrhea (18% vs. 8%), vomiting (18% vs. 4%), headache (14% vs. 4%), and constipation (10% vs. 2%) were higher with exenatide than with placebo. The study was of short duration. There were slight imbalances between groups at baseline in terms of sex, use of concomitant glucose-lowering medications, and HbA₁(c) levels, and more exenatide recipients than placebo recipients withdrew because of adverse events. Adding twice-daily exenatide injections improved glycemic control without increased hypoglycemia or weight gain in participants with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who were receiving insulin glargine treatment. Adverse events of exenatide included nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, headache, and constipation. Alliance of Eli Lilly and Company and Amylin Pharmaceuticals.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the management of diabetes mellitus.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Endocrinol Metab
                J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab
                jcem
                The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
                Endocrine Society (Washington, DC )
                0021-972X
                1945-7197
                June 2018
                23 April 2018
                23 April 2018
                : 103
                : 6
                : 2291-2301
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Endocrine and Metabolic Consultants, Rockville, Maryland
                [2 ]Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
                [3 ]Endocrine Research Solutions, Inc., Roswell, Georgia
                [4 ]Four Rivers Clinical Research, Paducah, Kentucky
                [5 ]Institute of Diabetes Research, Münster, Germany
                [6 ]Cedar-Crosse Research Center, Chicago, Illinois
                [7 ]Department of Metabolic Medicine, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
                [8 ]Novo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, New Jersey
                [9 ]Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark
                [10 ]University of California at San Francisco, Fresno, California
                Author notes
                Correspondence and Reprint Requests:  Helena W. Rodbard, MD, 3200 Tower Oaks Boulevard, Suite 250, Rockville, Maryland 20852. E-mail: hrodbard@ 123456comcast.net .
                Article
                jcem_201800070
                10.1210/jc.2018-00070
                5991220
                29688502
                21cd691e-5270-40c1-b3e0-6e2476413308
                Copyright © 2018 Endocrine Society

                This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 09 January 2018
                : 17 April 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Categories
                Clinical Research Articles
                Diabetes, Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Hormones

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article