13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      The Affect Misattribution Procedure : In Search of Prejudice Effects

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. The Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) has been forwarded as one of the most promising alternatives to the Implicit Association Test and the evaluative-priming task for measuring attitudes such as prejudice indirectly. We investigated whether the AMP is indeed able to detect an evaluative out-group bias. In contrast to recent conclusions about the robustness of AMP effects, six out of seven pilot studies indicated that participants did not show any prejudice effects in the AMP. Yet, these pilot studies were not fully conclusive with regard to our research question because they investigated different domains of prejudice, used small sample sizes, and employed a modified AMP version. In a preregistered, high-powered AMP study, we therefore examined whether the standard AMP does reveal prejudice against Turks, the biggest minority in Germany, and found a significant, albeit very small prejudice effect. We discuss possible reasons for the AMP’s weak sensitivity to evaluations in socially sensitive domains.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement.

            Misattributions people make about their own affective reactions can be used to measure attitudes implicitly. Combining the logic of projective tests with advances in priming research, the affect misattribution procedure (AMP) was sensitive to normatively favorable and unfavorable evaluations (Experiments 1-4), and the misattribution effect was strong at both fast and slow presentation rates (Experiments 3 and 4). Providing further evidence of validity, the AMP was strongly related to individual differences in self-reported political attitudes and voting intentions (Experiment 5). In the socially sensitive domain of racial attitudes, the AMP showed in-group bias for Black and White participants. AMP performance correlated with explicit racial attitudes, a relationship that was moderated by motivations to control prejudice (Experiment 6). Across studies, the task was unaffected by direct warnings to avoid bias. Advantages of the AMP include large effect sizes, high reliability, ease of use, and resistance to correction attempts.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Category accessibility and impression formation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                zea
                Experimental Psychology
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1618-3169
                2190-5142
                June 20, 2017
                2017
                : 64
                : 3
                : 215-230
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Institut für Psychologie, Sozialpsychologie und Methodenlehre, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
                [ 2 ]Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
                [ 3 ]Institut für Psychologie, Lehrstuhl für Pädagogische Psychologie, University of Regensburg, Germany
                Author notes
                Sarah Teige-Mocigemba, Institut für Psychologie, Sozialpsychologie und Methodenlehre, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg, Germany, teige@ 123456psychologie.uni-freiburg.de
                Article
                zea_64_3_215
                10.1027/1618-3169/a000364
                28633619
                21e264a8-4ff6-462d-acfc-38e5a15a1ff4
                Copyright @ 2017
                History
                : August 12, 2015
                : February 22, 2017
                : February 27, 2017
                Categories
                Registered Report

                Psychology,General behavioral science
                affect misattribution procedure,prejudice effects,implicit measures

                Comments

                Comment on this article