1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How safe are our paediatric emergency departments? Protocol for a national prospective cohort study

      protocol

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Adverse events (AEs), defined as unintended patient harm related to healthcare provided rather than an underlying medical condition, represent a significant threat to patient safety and public health. The emergency department (ED) is a high-risk patient safety setting for many reasons including presentation ‘outside of regular hours’, high patient volumes, and a chaotic work environment. Children have also been identified as particularly vulnerable to AEs. Despite the identification of the ED as a high-risk setting and the vulnerability of the paediatric population, little research has been conducted regarding paediatric patient safety in the ED. The study objective is to generate an estimate of the risk and type of AEs, as well as their preventability and severity, for children seen in Canadian paediatric EDs.

          Methods and analysis

          This multicentre, prospective cohort study will enrol patients under 18 years of age from nine paediatric EDs across Canada. A stratified cluster random sampling scheme will be used to ensure patients recruited are representative of the overall ED population. A rigorous, standardised two-stage process will be used for AE identification. The primary outcome will be the proportion of children with AEs associated with ED care in the 3 weeks following the ED visit. Secondary outcomes will include the proportion of children with preventable AEs and the types and severity of AEs. We will aim to recruit 5632 patients over 1 year and this will allow us to detect a proportion of patients with an AE of 5% (to within an absolute margin of error of 0.6%).

          Ethics and dissemination

          Ethics approval has been obtained from participating sites. Results will be disseminated through presentations, peer review publications, linkages with emergency research network and a webinars for key knowledge user groups.

          Trial registration number

          This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02162147; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02162147).

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Quality in Australian Health Care Study.

          A review of the medical records of over 14,000 admissions to 28 hospitals in New South Wales and South Australia revealed that 16.6% of these admissions were associated with an "adverse event", which resulted in disability or a longer hospital stay for the patient and was caused by health care management; 51% of the adverse events were considered preventable. In 77.1% the disability had resolved within 12 months, but in 13.7% the disability was permanent and in 4.9% the patient died.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The association between hospital overcrowding and mortality among patients admitted via Western Australian emergency departments.

            To examine the relationship between hospital and emergency department (ED) occupancy, as indicators of hospital overcrowding, and mortality after emergency admission. Retrospective analysis of 62 495 probabilistically linked emergency hospital admissions and death records. Three tertiary metropolitan hospitals between July 2000 and June 2003. All patients 18 years or older whose first ED attendance resulted in hospital admission during the study period. Deaths on days 2, 7 and 30 were evaluated against an Overcrowding Hazard Scale based on hospital and ED occupancy, after adjusting for age, diagnosis, referral source, urgency and mode of transport to hospital. There was a linear relationship between the Overcrowding Hazard Scale and deaths on Day 7 (r=0.98; 95% CI, 0.79-1.00). An Overcrowding Hazard Scale>2 was associated with an increased Day 2, Day 7 and Day 30 hazard ratio for death of 1.3 (95% CI, 1.1-1.6), 1.3 (95% CI, 1.2-1.5) and 1.2 (95% CI, 1.1-1.3), respectively. Deaths at 30 days associated with an Overcrowding Hazard Scale>2 compared with one of <3 were undifferentiated with respect to age, diagnosis, urgency, transport mode, referral source or hospital length of stay, but had longer ED durations of stay (risk ratio per hour of ED stay, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.1-1.1; P<0.001) and longer physician waiting times (risk ratio per hour of ED wait, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3; P=0.01). Hospital and ED overcrowding is associated with increased mortality. The Overcrowding Hazard Scale may be used to assess the hazard associated with hospital and ED overcrowding. Reducing overcrowding may improve outcomes for patients requiring emergency hospital admission.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of weekend admission and hospital teaching status on in-hospital mortality.

              The effect of reduced hospital staffing during weekends on in-hospital mortality is not known. We compared mortality rates between patients admitted on weekends and weekdays and whether weekend-weekday variation in rates differed between patients admitted to teaching and nonteaching hospitals in California. The sample comprised patients admitted to hospitals from the emergency department with any of 50 common diagnoses (N = 641,860). Mortality between patients admitted on weekends and those admitted on weekdays (the "weekend effect") was compared. The magnitude of the weekend effect was also compared among patients admitted to major teaching, minor teaching, and nonteaching hospitals. The adjusted odds of death for patients admitted on weekends when compared with weekdays was 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.06; P = 0.0050). Three diagnoses (cancer of the ovary/uterus, duodenal ulcer, and cardiovascular symptoms) were associated with a statistically significant weekend effect. None of the 50 diagnoses demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in mortality for weekend admissions as compared with weekday admissions. Mortality was similar among patients admitted to major (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.19) and minor (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.09) teaching hospitals, compared with nonteaching hospitals. However, the weekend effect was larger in major teaching hospitals compared with nonteaching hospitals (OR =1.13 vs. 1.03, P = 0.03) and minor teaching hospitals (OR = 1.05, P = 0.11). Patients admitted to hospitals on weekends experienced slightly higher risk-adjusted mortality than did patients admitted on weekdays. While overall mortality was similar for patients admitted to all hospital categories, the weekend effect was larger in major teaching hospitals and is cause for concern.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2014
                4 December 2014
                : 4
                : 12
                : e007064
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Departments of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [3 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
                [4 ]Department of Pediatrics and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                [5 ]Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                [6 ]Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [7 ]Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [8 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [9 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Amy C Plint; plint@ 123456cheo.on.ca
                Article
                bmjopen-2014-007064
                10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007064
                4256537
                25475246
                21e71522-9f8a-4d86-b8e3-83ed25aa2d72
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 30 October 2014
                : 11 November 2014
                : 12 November 2014
                Categories
                Emergency Medicine
                Protocol
                1506
                1691
                1719
                1691
                1704

                Medicine
                accident & emergency medicine
                Medicine
                accident & emergency medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article