36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions: a review of tobacco industry documents

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To examine tobacco industry marketing of menthol cigarettes and to determine what the tobacco industry knew about consumer perceptions of menthol.

          Methods

          A snowball sampling design was used to systematically search the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library (LTDL) ( http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu) between 28 February and 27 April 2010. Of the approximately 11 million documents available in the LTDL, the iterative searches returned tens of thousands of results from the major US tobacco companies and affiliated organisations. A collection of 953 documents from the 1930s to the first decade of the 21st century relevant to 1 or more of the research questions were qualitatively analysed, as follows: (1) are/were menthol cigarettes marketed with health reassurance messages? (2) What other messages come from menthol cigarette advertising? (3) How do smokers view menthol cigarettes? (4) Were menthol cigarettes marketed to specific populations?

          Results

          Menthol cigarettes were marketed as, and are perceived by consumers to be, healthier than non-menthol cigarettes. Menthol cigarettes are also marketed to specific social and demographic groups, including African–Americans, young people and women, and are perceived by consumers to signal social group belonging.

          Conclusions

          The tobacco industry knew consumers perceived menthol as healthier than non-menthol cigarettes, and this was the intent behind marketing. Marketing emphasising menthol attracts consumers who may not otherwise progress to regular smoking, including young, inexperienced users and those who find ‘regular’ cigarettes undesirable. Such marketing may also appeal to health-concerned smokers who might otherwise quit.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy.

          Lisa Bero (2002)
          The release of previously secret internal tobacco industry documents has given the public health community unprecedented insight into the industry's motives, strategies, tactics, and data. The documents provide information that is not available from any other source and describe the history of industry activities over the past 50 years. The documents show that the tobacco industry has been engaged in deceiving policy makers and the public for decades. This paper begins with a brief history of the tobacco industry documents and describes the methodological challenges related to locating and analyzing an enormous number of poorly indexed documents. It provides an overview of selected important findings of document research conducted to date, including analyses of industry documents on nicotine and addiction, product design, marketing and promotion, passive smoke, and internal activities. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of tobacco document research for public health and the application of such research to fields other than tobacco control.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Racialized geography, corporate activity, and health disparities: tobacco industry targeting of inner cities.

              Industry has played a complex role in the rise of tobacco-related diseases in the United States. The tobacco industry's activities, including targeted marketing, are arguably among the most powerful corporate influences on health and health policy. We analyzed over 400 internal tobacco industry documents to explore how, during the past several decades, the industry targeted inner cities populated predominantly by low-income African American residents with highly concentrated menthol cigarette marketing. We study how major tobacco companies competed against one another in menthol wars fought within these urban cores. Little previous work has analyzed the way in which the inner city's complex geography of race, class, and place shaped the avenues used by tobacco corporations to increase tobacco use in low-income, predominantly African American urban cores in the 1970s-1990s. Our analysis shows how the industry's activities contributed to the racialized geography of today's tobacco-related health disparities.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Tob Control
                tc
                tobaccocontrol
                Tobacco Control
                BMJ Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0964-4563
                1468-3318
                May 2011
                May 2011
                : 20
                : Suppl_2 , Menthol cigarettes
                : ii20-ii28
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), California, USA
                [2 ]Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UCSF, California, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Stacey J Anderson, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Box 0612, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0612, USA; stacey.anderson@ 123456ucsf.edu

                Linked articles: [Related article:]041947, [Related article:]041954, [Related article:]041962, [Related article:]041970, [Related article:]041988, [Related article:]041921.

                Article
                tobaccocontrol41939
                10.1136/tc.2010.041939
                3088454
                21504928
                21f2c2fe-460c-41c6-bf42-34c435ca83e5
                © 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

                History
                : 17 November 2010
                : 29 January 2011
                Categories
                Research Paper
                1506

                Public health
                menthol,tobacco products,tobacco industry,advertising and promotion,smoking,consumer perceptions,public policy,marketing

                Comments

                Comment on this article