39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Glutathione S-Transferases in Pediatric Cancer

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are a family of ubiquitously expressed polymorphic enzymes important for detoxifying endogenous and exogenous compounds. In addition to their classic activity of detoxification by conjugation of compounds with glutathione, many other functions are now found to be associated with GSTs. The associations between GST polymorphisms/functions and human disease susceptibility or treatment outcome, mostly in adults, have been extensively studied and reviewed. This mini review focuses on studies related to GST epidemiology and functions related to pediatric cancer. Opportunities to exploit GST in pediatric cancer therapy are also discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references108

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Glutathione and glutathione-dependent enzymes represent a co-ordinately regulated defence against oxidative stress.

          Increases in the intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), frequently referred to as oxidative stress, represents a potentially toxic insult which if not counteracted will lead to membrane dysfunction, DNA damage and inactivation of proteins. Chronic oxidative stress has numerous pathological consequences including cancer, arthritis and neurodegenerative disease. Glutathione-associated metabolism is a major mechanism for cellular protection against agents which generate oxidative stress. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the glutathione tripeptide is central to a complex multifaceted detoxification system, where there is substantial inter-dependence between separate component members. Glutathione participates in detoxification at several different levels, and may scavenge free radicals, reduce peroxides or be conjugated with electrophilic compounds. Thus, glutathione provides the cell with multiple defences not only against ROS but also against their toxic products. This article discusses how glutathione biosynthesis, glutathione peroxidases, glutathione S-transferases and glutathione S-conjugate efflux pumps function in an integrated fashion to allow cellular adaption to oxidative stress. Co-ordination of this response is achieved, at least in part, through the antioxidant responsive element (ARE) which is found in the promoters of many of the genes that are inducible by oxidative and chemical stress. Transcriptional activation through this enhancer appears to be mediated by basic leucine zipper transcription factors such as Nrf and small Maf proteins. The nature of the intracellular sensor(s) for ROS and thiol-active chemicals which induce genes through the ARE is described. Gene activation through the ARE appears to account for the enhanced antioxidant and detoxification capacity of normal cells effected by many cancer chemopreventive agents. In certain instances it may also account for acquired resistance of tumours to cancer chemotherapeutic drugs. It is therefore clear that determining the mechanisms involved in regulation of ARE-driven gene expression has enormous medical implications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Regulation of JNK signaling by GSTp.

            Studies of low basal Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activity in non-stressed cells led us to identify a JNK inhibitor that was purified and identified as glutathione S-transferase Pi (GSTp) and was characterized as a JNK-associated protein. UV irradiation or H2O2 treatment caused GSTp oligomerization and dissociation of the GSTp-JNK complex, indicating that it is the monomeric form of GSTp that elicits JNK inhibition. Addition of purified GSTp to the Jun-JNK complex caused a dose-dependent inhibition of JNK activity. Conversely, immunodepleting GSTp from protein extracts attenuated JNK inhibition. Furthermore, JNK activity was increased in the presence of specific GSTp inhibitors and a GSTp-derived peptide. Forced expression of GSTp decreased MKK4 and JNK phosphorylation which coincided with decreased JNK activity, increased c-Jun ubiquitination and decreased c-Jun-mediated transcription. Co-transfection of MEKK1 and GSTp restored MKK4 phosphorylation but did not affect GSTp inhibition of JNK activity, suggesting that the effect of GSTp on JNK is independent of the MEKK1-MKK4 module. Mouse embryo fibroblasts from GSTp-null mice exhibited a high basal level of JNK activity that could be reduced by forced expression of GSTp cDNA. In demonstrating the relationships between GSTp expression and its association with JNK, our findings provide new insight into the regulation of stress kinases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Structure, catalytic mechanism, and evolution of the glutathione transferases.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Research Foundation
                2234-943X
                24 October 2011
                2011
                : 1
                : 39
                Affiliations
                [1] 1simpleThe Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City, UT, USA
                [2] 2simpleThe Center for Children’s Cancer Research, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT, USA
                [3] 3simpleThe Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City, UT, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Mignon Lee-Cheun Loh, University of California, USA

                Reviewed by: Martin Stanulla, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Kenneth Tew, Medical University of South Carolina, USA

                *Correspondence: Stephen L. Lessnick, Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. e-mail: stephen.lessnick@ 123456hci.utah.edu

                This article was submitted to Frontiers in Pediatric Oncology, a specialty of Frontiers in Oncology.

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2011.00039
                3356086
                22655244
                2216c566-1c3c-4844-9519-6d82f5a65c5d
                Copyright © 2011 Luo, Kinsey, Schiffman and Lessnick.

                This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.

                History
                : 22 July 2011
                : 03 October 2011
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 112, Pages: 11, Words: 8496
                Categories
                Oncology
                Review Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                drug resistance,epidemiology,therapeutic target,pediatric cancer,glutathione s-transferase,microsatellite

                Comments

                Comment on this article