14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

      Europace
      Aged, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, methods, Cicatrix, pathology, ultrasonography, Echocardiography, Exercise Tolerance, physiology, Female, Gadolinium, Humans, Logistic Models, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Myocardial Ischemia, therapy, Myocardium, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To determine whether myocardial scarring, quantified using late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR), predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). A total of 45 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy [age 67.1 +/- 10.4 years (mean +/- SD)] underwent assessment of 6 min walking distance (6MWD) and quality of life (QoL) before and after CRT. Scar size (percentage of left ventricular mass), location, and transmurality were assessed prior to CRT using LGE-CMR. Responders (survived for 1 year with no heart failure hospitalizations, and improvement by >or=1 NYHA classes or >or=25% 6MWD) had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.048), smaller scars (<33%) (P = 0.009), and fewer scars with >or=51% transmurality (P = 0.002). Scar size correlated negatively with change in 6MWD (r = -0.54, P < 0.001) and positively with changes in QoL scores (r = 0.35, P = 0.028). Responder rates in patients with <33% scar were higher than in those with >or=33% scar (82 vs. 35%, P < 0.01). Responder rates in patients with scar transmurality <51% were higher than in those with >or=51% (89 vs. 46%, P < 0.01). Among the patients with posterolateral scars, a transmurality value of >or=51% was associated with a particularly poor response rate (23%), compared with scars with <51% transmurality (88%, P < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, both scar size (P = 0.022) and transmurality (P = 0.004) emerged as predictors of response. In patients with posterolateral scars, pacing outside the scar was associated with a better responder rate than pacing over the scar (86 vs. 33%, P = 0.004). In patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, a scar size >or=33%, a transmurality >or=51%, and pacing over a posterolateral scar are associated with a suboptimal response to CRT.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article