26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Anticipation of COVID-19 Vaccines Reduces Willingness to Socially Distance

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We investigate how the anticipation of COVID-19 vaccines affects voluntary social distancing. In a large-scale preregistered survey experiment with a representative sample, we study whether providing information about the safety, effectiveness, and availability of COVID-19 vaccines affects the willingness to comply with public health guidelines. We find that vaccine information reduces peoples’ voluntary social distancing, adherence to hygiene guidelines, and their willingness to stay at home. Getting positive information on COVID-19 vaccines induces people to believe in a swifter return to normal life. The results indicate an important behavioral drawback of successful vaccine development: An increased focus on vaccines can lower compliance with public health guidelines and accelerate the spread of infectious disease. The results imply that, as vaccinations roll out and the end of a pandemic feels closer, policies aimed at increasing social distancing will be less effective, and stricter policies might be required.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response

          The COVID-19 pandemic represents a massive global health crisis. Because the crisis requires large-scale behaviour change and places significant psychological burdens on individuals, insights from the social and behavioural sciences can be used to help align human behaviour with the recommendations of epidemiologists and public health experts. Here we discuss evidence from a selection of research topics relevant to pandemics, including work on navigating threats, social and cultural influences on behaviour, science communication, moral decision-making, leadership, and stress and coping. In each section, we note the nature and quality of prior research, including uncertainty and unsettled issues. We identify several insights for effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight important gaps researchers should move quickly to fill in the coming weeks and months.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development

            Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first reported in late 2019 in China and is the causative agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To mitigate the effects of the virus on public health, the economy and society, a vaccine is urgently needed. Here I review the development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Development was initiated when the genetic sequence of the virus became available in early January 2020, and has moved at an unprecedented speed: a phase I trial started in March 2020 and there are currently more than 180 vaccines at various stages of development. Data from phase I and phase II trials are already available for several vaccine candidates, and many have moved into phase III trials. The data available so far suggest that effective and safe vaccines might become available within months, rather than years.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Emotion and Decision Making

              A revolution in the science of emotion has emerged in recent decades, with the potential to create a paradigm shift in decision theories. The research reveals that emotions constitute potent, pervasive, predictable, sometimes harmful and sometimes beneficial drivers of decision making. Across different domains, important regularities appear in the mechanisms through which emotions influence judgments and choices. We organize and analyze what has been learned from the past 35 years of work on emotion and decision making. In so doing, we propose the emotion-imbued choice model, which accounts for inputs from traditional rational choice theory and from newer emotion research, synthesizing scientific models.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Health Econ
                J Health Econ
                Journal of Health Economics
                The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
                0167-6296
                1879-1646
                15 September 2021
                15 September 2021
                : 102530
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Economics, Uppsala University, Sweden
                [b ]Uppsala Center for Fiscal Studies, Uppsala University, Sweden
                [c ]Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Sweden
                [d ]Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
                [e ]Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Unisanté, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
                [f ]Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Basel, Switzerland
                [g ]Department of Economics, Lund University, Sweden
                [h ]Department of Finance and Economics, Hanken School of Economics, Finland
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: Department of Economics, Lund University School of Economics and Management, Box 7080, 220 07 Lund, Sweden
                Article
                S0167-6296(21)00115-6 102530
                10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102530
                8442531
                34563830
                22601846-0b77-466e-8683-97ccf5f85597
                © 2021 The Authors

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 3 May 2021
                : 31 August 2021
                : 1 September 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Economics of health & social care
                social distancing,vaccination,information,economic epidemiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log