13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A new prediction model for operative time of flexible ureteroscopy with lithotripsy for the treatment of renal stones

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study aimed to develop a prediction model for the operative time of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for renal stones. We retrospectively evaluated patients with renal stones who had been treated successfully and had stone-free status determined by non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) 3 months after fURS and holmium laser lithotripsy between December 2009 and September 2014 at a single institute. Correlations between possible factors and the operative time were analyzed using Spearman’s correlation coefficients and a multivariate linear regression model. The P value < 0.1 was used for entry of variables into the model and for keeping the variables in the model. Internal validation was performed using 10,000 bootstrap resamples. Flexible URS was performed in 472 patients, and 316 patients were considered to have stone-free status and were enrolled in this study. Spearman’s correlation coefficients showed a significant positive relationship between the operation time and stone volume (ρ = 0.417, p < 0.001), and between the operation time and maximum Hounsfield units (ρ = 0.323, p < 0.001). A multivariate assessment with forced entry and stepwise selection revealed six factors to predict the operative time of fURS: preoperative stenting, stone volume, maximum Hounsfield unit, surgeon experience, sex, and sheath diameter. Based on this finding, we developed a model to predict operative time of fURS. The coefficient of determination (R 2) in this model was 0.319; the mean R 2 value for the prediction model was 0.320 ± 0.049. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a model for predicting the operative time of fURS treatment of renal stones. The model may be used to reliably predict operative time preoperatively based on patient characteristics and the surgeons’ experience, plan staged URS, and avoid surgical complications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

          This review focuses on a step-by-step approach to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and its complications and management. Based on institutional and personal experience with >1000 patients treated by PNL, we reviewed the literature (Pubmed search) focusing on technique, type, and incidence of complications of the procedure. Complications during or after PNL may be present with an overall complication rate of up to 83%, including extravasation (7.2%), transfusion (11.2-17.5%), and fever (21.0-32.1%), whereas major complications, such as septicaemia (0.3-4.7%) and colonic (0.2-0.8%) or pleural injury (0.0-3.1%) are rare. Comorbidity (i.e., renal insufficiency, diabetes, gross obesity, pulmonary disease) increases the risk of complications. Most complications (i.e., bleeding, extravasation, fever) can be managed conservatively or minimally invasively (i.e., pleural drain, superselective renal embolisation) if recognised early. The most important consideration for achieving consistently successful outcomes in PNL with minimal major complications is the correct selection of patients. A well-standardised technique and postoperative follow-up are mandatory for early detection of complications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations.

            The incidence of postoperative complications is still the most frequently used surrogate marker of quality in surgery, but no standard guidelines or criteria exist for reporting surgical complications in the area of urology. To review the available reporting systems used for urologic surgical complications, to establish a possible change in attitude towards reporting of complications using standardised systems, to assess systematically the Clavien-Dindo system when used for the reporting of complications related to urologic surgical procedures, to identify shortcomings in reporting complications, and to propose recommendations for the development and implementation of future reporting systems that are focused on patient-centred outcomes. Standardised systems for reporting and classification of surgical complications were identified through a systematic review of the literature. To establish a possible change in attitude towards reporting of complications related to urologic procedures, we performed a systematic literature search of all papers reporting complications after urologic surgery published in European Urology, Journal of Urology, Urology, BJU International, and World Journal of Urology in 1999-2000 and 2009-2010. Data identification for the systematic assessment of the Clavien-Dindo system currently used for the reporting of complications related to urologic surgical interventions involved a Medline/Embase search and the search engines of individual urologic journals and publishers using Clavien, urology, and complications as keywords. All selected papers were full-text retrieved and assessed; analysis was done based on structured forms. The systematic review of the literature for standardised systems used for reporting and classification of surgical complications revealed five such systems. As far as the attitude of urologists towards reporting of complications, a shift could be seen in the number of studies using most of the Martin criteria, as well as in the number of studies using either standardised criteria or the Clavien-Dindo system. The latter system was not properly used in 72 papers (35.3%). Uniformed reporting of complications after urologic procedures will aid all those involved in patient care and scientific publishing (authors, reviewers, and editors). It will also contribute to the improvement of the scientific quality of papers published in the field of urologic surgery. When reporting the outcomes of urologic procedures, the committee proposes a series of quality criteria. Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stepwise selection in small data sets: a simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis.

              Stepwise selection methods are widely applied to identify covariables for inclusion in regression models. One of the problems of stepwise selection is biased estimation of the regression coefficients. We illustrate this "selection bias" with logistic regression in the GUSTO-I trial (40,830 patients with an acute myocardial infarction). Random samples were drawn that included 3, 5, 10, 20, or 40 events per variable (EPV). Backward stepwise selection was applied in models containing 8 or 16 pre-specified predictors of 30-day mortality. We found a considerable overestimation of regression coefficients of selected covariables. The selection bias decreased with increasing EPV. For EPV 3, 10, or 40, the bias exceeded 25% for 7, 3, and 1 in the 8-predictor model respectively, when a conventional selection criterion was used (alpha = 0.05). For these EPV values, the bias was less than 20% for all covariables when no selection was applied. We conclude that stepwise selection may result in a substantial bias of estimated regression coefficients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Writing – original draft
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Methodology
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Supervision
                Role: Supervision
                Role: Data curationRole: Supervision
                Role: Supervision
                Role: Supervision
                Role: Supervision
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Supervision
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                13 February 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 2
                : e0192597
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Urology, Ohguchi Higashi General Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
                [2 ] Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
                [3 ] Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
                [4 ] Department of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
                Sun Yat-sen University, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-0297
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4433-370X
                Article
                PONE-D-17-35302
                10.1371/journal.pone.0192597
                5811000
                29438410
                227642e7-36e0-4731-afac-2ecb49d358bf
                © 2018 Kuroda et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 3 October 2017
                : 28 January 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 10
                Funding
                The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Statistical Methods
                Forecasting
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics (Mathematics)
                Statistical Methods
                Forecasting
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
                Stent Implantation
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Bacterial Diseases
                Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Statistical Methods
                Regression Analysis
                Linear Regression Analysis
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics (Mathematics)
                Statistical Methods
                Regression Analysis
                Linear Regression Analysis
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Medical Doctors
                Surgeons
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Medical Doctors
                Surgeons
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Medical Doctors
                Physicians
                Surgeons
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Medical Doctors
                Physicians
                Surgeons
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Urology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Renal System
                Ureter
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Renal System
                Ureter
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article