4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Hidden state models improve state-dependent diversification approaches, including biogeographical models : HMM AND THE ADEQUACY OF SSE MODELS

      1 , 2 , 1
      Evolution
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d12389789e75">The state-dependent speciation and extinction (SSE) models have recently been criticized due to their high rates of "false positive" results. Many researchers have advocated avoiding SSE models in favor of other "nonparametric" or "semiparametric" approaches. The hidden Markov modeling (HMM) approach provides a partial solution to the issues of model adequacy detected with SSE models. The inclusion of "hidden states" can account for rate heterogeneity observed in empirical phylogenies and allows for reliable detection of state-dependent diversification or diversification shifts independent of the trait of interest. However, the adoption of HMM has been hampered by the interpretational challenges of what exactly a "hidden state" represents, which we clarify herein. We show that HMMs in combination with a model-averaging approach naturally account for hidden traits when examining the meaningful impact of a suspected "driver" of diversification. We also extend the HMM to the geographic state-dependent speciation and extinction (GeoSSE) model. We test the efficacy of our "GeoHiSSE" extension with both simulations and an empirical dataset. On the whole, we show that hidden states are a general framework that can distinguish heterogeneous effects of diversification attributed to a focal character. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Model inadequacy and mistaken inferences of trait-dependent speciation.

          Species richness varies widely across the tree of life, and there is great interest in identifying ecological, geographic, and other factors that affect rates of species proliferation. Recent methods for explicitly modeling the relationships among character states, speciation rates, and extinction rates on phylogenetic trees- BiSSE, QuaSSE, GeoSSE, and related models-have been widely used to test hypotheses about character state-dependent diversification rates. Here, we document the disconcerting ease with which neutral traits are inferred to have statistically significant associations with speciation rate. We first demonstrate this unfortunate effect for a known model assumption violation: shifts in speciation rate associated with a character not included in the model. We further show that for many empirical phylogenies, characters simulated in the absence of state-dependent diversification exhibit an even higher Type I error rate, indicating that the method is susceptible to additional, unknown model inadequacies. For traits that evolve slowly, the root cause appears to be a statistical framework that does not require replicated shifts in character state and diversification. However, spurious associations between character state and speciation rate arise even for traits that lack phylogenetic signal, suggesting that phylogenetic pseudoreplication alone cannot fully explain the problem. The surprising severity of this phenomenon suggests that many trait-diversification relationships reported in the literature may not be real. More generally, we highlight the need for diagnosing and understanding the consequences of model inadequacy in phylogenetic comparative methods.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Evolution
            Evolution
            Wiley
            00143820
            November 2018
            November 2018
            October 07 2018
            : 72
            : 11
            : 2308-2324
            Affiliations
            [1 ]Department of Biological Sciences; University of Arkansas; Fayetteville Arkansas 72701
            [2 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology; University of Tennessee; Knoxville Tennessee 37996-1610
            Article
            10.1111/evo.13602
            30226270
            227ad410-9665-4d0b-a0a6-0f9c52760d04
            © 2018

            http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

            http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

            History

            Comments

            Comment on this article