7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Psychophysical inference of frequency-following fidelity in the neural substrate for brain stimulation reward.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The rewarding effect of electrical brain stimulation has been studied extensively for 60 years, yet the identity of the underlying neural circuitry remains unknown. Previous experiments have characterized the directly stimulated ("first-stage") neurons implicated in self-stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle. Their properties are consistent with those of fine, myelinated axons, at least some of which project rostro-caudally. These properties do not match those of dopaminergic neurons. The present psychophysical experiment estimates an additional first-stage characteristic: maximum firing frequency. We test a frequency-following model that maps the experimenter-set pulse frequency into the frequency of firing induced in the directly stimulated neurons. As pulse frequency is increased, firing frequency initially increases at the same rate, then becomes probabilistic, and finally levels off. The frequency-following function is based on the counter model which holds that the rewarding effect of a pulse train is determined by the aggregate spike rate triggered in first-stage neurons during a given interval. In 7 self-stimulating rats, we measured current- vs. pulse-frequency trade-off functions. The trade-off data were well described by the frequency-following model, and its upper asymptote was approached at a median value of 360 Hz (IQR = 46 Hz). This value implies a highly excitable, non-dopaminergic population of first-stage neurons. Incorporating the frequency-following function and parameters in Shizgal's 3-dimensional reward-mountain model improves its accuracy and predictive power.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Behav. Brain Res.
          Behavioural brain research
          Elsevier BV
          1872-7549
          0166-4328
          Oct 01 2015
          : 292
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Center for Studies in Behavioural Neurobiology/Groupe de Recherche en Neurobiologie Comportementale, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, SP-244, Montréal, Québec H4B 1R6, Canada. Electronic address: solomon.rb@gmail.com.
          [2 ] Center for Studies in Behavioural Neurobiology/Groupe de Recherche en Neurobiologie Comportementale, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, SP-244, Montréal, Québec H4B 1R6, Canada. Electronic address: pisanty.ivan@gmail.com.
          [3 ] Center for Studies in Behavioural Neurobiology/Groupe de Recherche en Neurobiologie Comportementale, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, SP-244, Montréal, Québec H4B 1R6, Canada. Electronic address: conover@gmail.com.
          [4 ] Center for Studies in Behavioural Neurobiology/Groupe de Recherche en Neurobiologie Comportementale, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, SP-244, Montréal, Québec H4B 1R6, Canada. Electronic address: peter.shizgal@concordia.ca.
          Article
          S0166-4328(15)30033-4
          10.1016/j.bbr.2015.06.008
          26057357
          228e4ac2-47b0-4028-9b33-cb44d10725d5
          History

          Dopamine,Frequency following,Intracranial self-stimulation,Lateral hypothalamus,Medial forebrain bundle,Brain stimulation reward

          Comments

          Comment on this article