363
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    5
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An Integrated Risk Function for Estimating the Global Burden of Disease Attributable to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Exposure

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Estimating the burden of disease attributable to long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) in ambient air requires knowledge of both the shape and magnitude of the relative risk (RR) function. However, adequate direct evidence to identify the shape of the mortality RR functions at the high ambient concentrations observed in many places in the world is lacking.

          Objective: We developed RR functions over the entire global exposure range for causes of mortality in adults: ischemic heart disease (IHD), cerebrovascular disease (stroke), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and lung cancer (LC). We also developed RR functions for the incidence of acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) that can be used to estimate mortality and lost-years of healthy life in children < 5 years of age.

          Methods: We fit an integrated exposure–response (IER) model by integrating available RR information from studies of ambient air pollution (AAP), second hand tobacco smoke, household solid cooking fuel, and active smoking (AS). AS exposures were converted to estimated annual PM 2.5 exposure equivalents using inhaled doses of particle mass. We derived population attributable fractions (PAFs) for every country based on estimated worldwide ambient PM 2.5 concentrations.

          Results: The IER model was a superior predictor of RR compared with seven other forms previously used in burden assessments. The percent PAF attributable to AAP exposure varied among countries from 2 to 41 for IHD, 1 to 43 for stroke, < 1 to 21 for COPD, < 1 to 25 for LC, and < 1 to 38 for ALRI.

          Conclusions: We developed a fine particulate mass–based RR model that covered the global range of exposure by integrating RR information from different combustion types that generate emissions of particulate matter. The model can be updated as new RR information becomes available.

          Citation: Burnett RT, Pope CA III, Ezzati M, Olives C, Lim SS, Mehta S, Shin HH, Singh G, Hubbell B, Brauer M, Anderson HR, Smith KR, Balmes JR, Bruce NG, Kan H, Laden F, Prüss-Ustün A, Turner MC, Gapstur SM, Diver WR, Cohen A. 2014. An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environ Health Perspect 122:397–403;  http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307049

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

          The Lancet, 380(9859), 2224-2260
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Millions dead: how do we know and what does it mean? Methods used in the comparative risk assessment of household air pollution.

            In the Comparative Risk Assessment (CRA) done as part of the Global Burden of Disease project (GBD-2010), the global and regional burdens of household air pollution (HAP) due to the use of solid cookfuels, were estimated along with 60+ other risk factors. This article describes how the HAP CRA was framed; how global HAP exposures were modeled; how diseases were judged to have sufficient evidence for inclusion; and how meta-analyses and exposure-response modeling were done to estimate relative risks. We explore relationships with the other air pollution risk factors: ambient air pollution, smoking, and secondhand smoke. We conclude with sensitivity analyses to illustrate some of the major uncertainties and recommendations for future work. We estimate that in 2010 HAP was responsible for 3.9 million premature deaths and ∼4.8% of lost healthy life years (DALYs), ranking it highest among environmental risk factors examined and one of the major risk factors of any type globally.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Exposure assessment for estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to outdoor air pollution.

              Ambient air pollution is associated with numerous adverse health impacts. Previous assessments of global attributable disease burden have been limited to urban areas or by coarse spatial resolution of concentration estimates. Recent developments in remote sensing, global chemical-transport models, and improvements in coverage of surface measurements facilitate virtually complete spatially resolved global air pollutant concentration estimates. We combined these data to generate global estimates of long-term average ambient concentrations of fine particles (PM(2.5)) and ozone at 0.1° × 0.1° spatial resolution for 1990 and 2005. In 2005, 89% of the world's population lived in areas where the World Health Organization Air Quality Guideline of 10 μg/m(3) PM(2.5) (annual average) was exceeded. Globally, 32% of the population lived in areas exceeding the WHO Level 1 Interim Target of 35 μg/m(3), driven by high proportions in East (76%) and South (26%) Asia. The highest seasonal ozone levels were found in North and Latin America, Europe, South and East Asia, and parts of Africa. Between 1990 and 2005 a 6% increase in global population-weighted PM(2.5) and a 1% decrease in global population-weighted ozone concentrations was apparent, highlighted by increased concentrations in East, South, and Southeast Asia and decreases in North America and Europe. Combined with spatially resolved population distributions, these estimates expand the evaluation of the global health burden associated with outdoor air pollution.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Environ Health Perspect
                Environ. Health Perspect
                EHP
                Environmental Health Perspectives
                National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
                0091-6765
                1552-9924
                11 February 2014
                April 2014
                : 122
                : 4
                : 397-403
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
                [3 ]MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
                [4 ]School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
                [5 ]Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA
                [6 ]Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves, Washington, DC, USA
                [7 ]Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
                [8 ]U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
                [9 ]School of Population and Public Health, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
                [10 ]MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, King’s College London, London, UK
                [11 ]University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
                [12 ]School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
                [13 ]School of Medicine, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
                [14 ]Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
                [15 ]School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
                [16 ]Exposure, Epidemiology, and Risk Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [17 ]World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
                [18 ]Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [19 ]American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [20 ]Health Effects Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [* ]Senior Author
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to R.T. Burnett, Population Studies Division, Environmental Health Sciences and Research Bureau, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Healthy Environment and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Room 134, Environmental Health Center, 50 Columbine Driveway, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0K9. Telephone: (613) 952-1364. E-mail: rick.burnett@ 123456hc-sc.gc.ca
                Article
                ehp.1307049
                10.1289/ehp.1307049
                3984213
                24518036
                22ae74e8-073f-410b-8131-0ef33ad18941

                Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.

                History
                : 06 May 2013
                : 07 February 2014
                : 11 February 2014
                : 01 April 2014
                Categories
                Research

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article