6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Justice, Fairness, and Employee Reactions

      ,
      Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
      Annual Reviews

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences.

          What are the positive and negative consequences of telecommuting? How do these consequences come about? When are these consequences more or less potent? The authors answer these questions through construction of a theoretical framework and meta-analysis of 46 studies in natural settings involving 12,883 employees. Telecommuting had small but mainly beneficial effects on proximal outcomes, such as perceived autonomy and (lower) work-family conflict. Importantly, telecommuting had no generally detrimental effects on the quality of workplace relationships. Telecommuting also had beneficial effects on more distal outcomes, such as job satisfaction, performance, turnover intent, and role stress. These beneficial consequences appeared to be at least partially mediated by perceived autonomy. Also, high-intensity telecommuting (more than 2.5 days a week) accentuated telecommuting's beneficial effects on work-family conflict but harmed relationships with coworkers. Results provide building blocks for a more complete theoretical and practical treatment of telecommuting. (c) 2007 APA
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure.

            This study explores the dimensionality of organizational justice and provides evidence of construct validity for a new justice measure. Items for this measure were generated by strictly following the seminal works in the justice literature. The measure was then validated in 2 separate studies. Study 1 occurred in a university setting, and Study 2 occurred in a field setting using employees in an automobile parts manufacturing company. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a 4-factor structure to the measure, with distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice as distinct dimensions. This solution fit the data significantly better than a 2- or 3-factor solution using larger interactional or procedural dimensions. Structural equation modeling also demonstrated predictive validity for the justice dimensions on important outcomes, including leader evaluation, rule compliance, commitment, and helping behavior.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book Chapter: not found

              What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
                Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav.
                Annual Reviews
                2327-0608
                2327-0616
                April 10 2015
                April 10 2015
                : 2
                : 1
                : 75-99
                Article
                10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111457
                22b260af-23d7-4e73-8bce-75478dde1bca
                © 2015
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article